Brainwashing

[Sharing Lights]

To be obeyed, one must be believed. If one is sufficiently believed,
one will unquestioningly be obeyed.
When he is fortunate enough to get his hands on anyone close to a
political or important figure, this factor of obedience becomes very
important. A certain amount of fear or terror must be engendered in
the person under treatment so that this person will then take orders
immediately, completely, and unquestioningly, from the psychopolitical
operative, and so be able to influence the actions of the person
who is to be reached.
Bringing about this state of mind on the part of a populace and its
leaders—that a psychopolitical operative must, at all times be
believed—could eventually be attended by very good fortune.
It is not too much to hope that psychopolitical
operatives would then, in a country such as the United States, become the most intimate advisors
to political figures, even to the point of advising the entirety of a
political party as to its actions in an election.
The long view is the important view. Belief is engendered by a certain
amount of fear and terror from an authoritative level, and this
will be followed by obedience.
The general propaganda that would best serve Psychopolitics
would be a continual instance that certain authoritative levels of
healing deemed this or that discipline to be the only correct treatment
of insanity. These treatments must always include a certain amount
of brutality. Propaganda should continue to stress the rising incidence
of insanity in a country. The entire field of human behavior,
for the benefit of the country, can, at length, be broadened into abnormal
behavior. Thus, anyone indulging in any eccentricity, particularly
the eccentricity of combating psychopolitics, could be silenced
by the authoritative opinion on the part of a psychopolitical operative
that he was acting in an abnormal fashion. This, with some good
fortune, could bring the person into the hands of the psychopolitical
operative so as to forevermore disable him, or swerve his loyalties by
pain-drug hypnotism.
On the subject of obedience itself, the optimum obedience is
unthinking obedience. The command given must be obeyed without
any rationalizing on the part of the subject. The command must,
therefore, be implanted below the thinking processes of the subject to
be influenced, and must react upon him in such a way as to produce
no mental alertness on his part.
It is in the interest of Psychopolitics that a population be told that
an hypnotized person will not do anything against his actual will,
will not commit immoral acts, and will not act so as to endanger himself.
While this may be true of light, parlour hypnotism, it certainly
is not true of commands implanted with the use of electric shock,
drugs, or heavy punishment. The operative counts heavily on the
general public’s faith in the more benign perception of hypnotic
power, for if it were to be generally known that individuals would
obey commands harmful to themselves, and would commit immoral
acts while under the influence of deep hypnotic commands, the
actions of many people, working unknowingly in favor of communism,
would be too well understood. People acting under deep hypnotic
commands should be acting apparently of their own
volition and out of their own convictions.
The entire subject of psychopolitical hypnosis, Psychopolitics in
general, depends for its defense upon the continuous insistence on
the part of authoritative sources that such things are not possible.
And, should anyone unmask a psychopolitical operative, the operative
should at once declare the whole thing to be a physical impossibility
and use his authoritative position to discount any accusation.
Should any writings of Psychopolitics come to view, it is only necessary
to brand them a hoax and laugh them out of existence. Thus,
psychopolitical activities are easy to defend.
When psychopolitical activities have reached a certain peak, from
there on it is almost impossible to undo them, for the population is
already under the duress of obedience to the psychopolitical operatives
and their dupes. The ingredient of obedience is important, for
the complete belief in the psychopolitical operative renders his statement
canceling any challenge to psychopolitical operations
irrefutable. The optimum circumstance would be to occupy every
position that would be consulted by officials whenever the subject of
Psychopolitics came under question. Thus, a psychiatric advisor
should be placed near to hand in every government operation. As all
suspicions would then be referred to him, no action would ever be
taken, and the goal of communism could be realized in that nation.
Psychopolitics depends, from the viewpoint of the layman, upon
its fantastic aspects. These are its best defense, but above all else is
implicit obedience on the part of officials and the general public
because of the role of the psychopolitical operative in the field of
healing.

to be continued to Chapter 7 later

[Sharing Lights]

Part I

A disclaimer:

the term Communists is used to
refer to the actual political movement,
as well as, to all the enemies of the
real people of the USA and/or free world.

Communists' agenda implemented from abroad is,
well seen, in the case of most lawyers
and how they destabilize the country and antagonize
the People, while the Communists are laughing.

First of all, they create a deep hate toward them (lawyers-judges) from common people.

Hate usually breeds violence.

Violence breeds strengthening and enlargement
of the Policing force.

A proportion:

As inflation is to economic depression,
a Police State is to Marshall Law.

During Marshall Law, all rights and the Constitution
are suspended!

More Policing means less freedom and democracy
and more control to those who hold power.

That is what Communists want - less freedom and democracy to their enemies - i.e. us.

More violence and unrests - means lawyers are
busy and make more monies, as cases grow.

Therefore, the Communists want the lawyers
of the hated by them country to be
as busy as possible.


Busy lawyers means they accumulate
a lot of capital in their hands.


More monies to them, means some one has
to give that monies to them.

Who?

You - the client, who always pays them, while they
keep increasing their fees regardless of the economy.


Accumulating the capital at the top of the pyramid,
implies monopoly and more unrest as People would
always resit monopoly from any source since Monopoly
attempts to enslave them, literally.

More unrest and struggle are perpetuated.

The Communists laugh even more as without firing a
shot, they create a growing struggle among
the country they hate and try to weaken.

No foreigner can seize country which is
strong and stable.

Only weakened and unstable country may be
overrun, one day, by the aggressor.


Lawyers can take even more monies from you than doctors.

Lawyers are targeted by the Communists through introducing the latter's agenda into the Universities
which create these lawyers.

(Just read Beria of the Soviet Russia above)

God/Nature, never, intrude on humans', fundamental Rights.

It is only immoral individuals who attempt to take it
away from you so that they can add such theft
to their wealth!

In fact, that is how they make most of their profits,
at your expense.

When lawyers seized the monopoly on law, they
accomplished that thorough their organization -
the Bar Association.

Has that not been done via taking
your rights away?

Can you get now much Justice in the US Courts,
which are run by such, Bar Association?

Aren't Courts supposed to represent us -

the People or them - lawyers?

Are the current laws and procedures implemented,
there, to benefit you or benefit them,

so that they can make more dollars and faster?

Didn't they create a weird lingo in Courts
so that you need them to translate it?

Isn't, almost, the whole, legal system set up by them
so that you are trapped from all the angles?

Even in simple cases, you loose unless decide
to learn on your own: as, either,

a) you pay the Plaintiff
who attempts to extort the monies from you,
or

b) you pay "your" lawyer a dollar hungry
"vacuum cleaner", who would defend your Rights
for the dollars excepted?

Is it not contradiction and travesty?

I say it is not your lawyer but you are his!

to be continued

[Sharing Lights]

Part II



What kind of Rights do you have left if you must pay for them?

Any time you pay for something, it is not a true Right
anymore it is an opportunity, option, or a service for hire.

When you walk in a store, do you have a right to
demand a product or you have to pay for it?

If you pay, that means you do not have the right
to demand or expect.

When you reside in the apartment you rent
or house you live, do you have to pay
for the right to bring a guest there
or that is your right:
free and self-evident?

Well, the Bar took

your free and self-evident right
for Justice away (as all have such right)

and made
you pay them monies and lots of them.

As their greed has no limits, they perfected a fraud,
where, regardless of their
success or failure, you usually,
still must pay them the demanded by them fee.

What kind of Justice is that?

A bought justice or justice for price!

Why do we have to pay for Justice in the first place?

Once the Justice is paid for, it is not Justice anymore.

I repeat, it is a bought "product or commodity" directly proportionate to your ability to pay.

The more you can pay, the more justice you may be able to buy with few exceptions.

There are exceptions to any rule.

In such, fraudulent "justice"system,
a criminal who has much
money can pay for his/her "Justice,"
while a descent person, who has no mean of
paying may not see that product - Justice at all.

Furthermore:

If you purchased a product and it failed to perform,
don't you have a right to return such product
and get your monies back if done timely?


Who would expect you to pay monies for
what doesn't work?

Well, how is that you and I have to pay the
extortionist-lawyers their outrageous fees
even when the same lawyers failed to produce
an expected product-result, which is - a win?

Why do we, still, have to pay for the lawyers' failures?

If they represented us and lost, then,
they lost - not us, as we hired them and paid
them to produce, to win - not to loose.

If they can't win, the lawyers should not charge us
for failure and their incompetence.

We pay them real US dollars - they should give
us real product too - a win.

How is that possible that they can give us crap
and, still, take "gold (money?)"

Well, once gain, the Bar Association
made it possible through
their monopoly on law.

Antitrust laws
must be implemented vs. the Bar.

Monopoly,
regardless of the source implies total control
over the subject.

Is is not a definition of a slavery?

Yes, the Bar (the lawyers) have enslaved us.

It is time to be free again.

Monopoly must be broken - that is the only way.

[Sharing Lights]

Part III

Busy lawyers means they accumulate

a lot of capital in their hands.

Why is that dangerous to you?

It is not only dangerous, it is freedom threatening,
as lawyers have tremendous weapon -
a knowledge of law.
Not, the same lawyers gain another
tremendous weapon - money!

Combine both, and you get a combustive mix.


Loaded with knowledge and dollars, lawyers and judges,
who are the top of lawyers' wing, can use both
weapons, now:

to buy,
bribe,
influence,
coerce,

and get their paws on the Ultimate protector
of freedom to all People - the Constitution of the USA.


It is inevitable that rich lawyers-judges, who are, by the
way, are prohibited to hold Governmental positions, as
was stated by the founding Fathers, who saw the
threat clearly, would attempt to change the Constituion
of the USA in their favor.

The Constitution is meant to protect the People -
not them.

That is self-evident.


Lawyers-judges want to protect their interests -
not yours.

That is also equally self-evident.

What more do you need to wake up to the reality?

What Communists fear the most?


A powerful system of values and laws that keep the
country strong and leave the power
in the hands of the People.

In order to enslave the people, the Communists need an
ally who would enslave the people for them.

The Communists do not, curerntly, have direct means to
attack the country effectively in head to head confrontation.

So they use the tactics of the quite revolt within.


Once the Constituion is weakened or abolished, the
power is concentrated in the hands of lawyers-judges-politicians.

Most politicians are lawyers-judges.

That's a fact, as

in order to be an effective politician
one must know the law well so that he/she can
manipulate it to his/her advantage.

Once the Constitution is undermined and the power:

law and money

are shifted to lawyers-judges-politicians, the Citizens of
the US i.e. the real People become powerless.

The stated above elite becomes powerful.

The pyramid is created.

The people are on the bottom, the elite is on the top.

[Sharing Lights]

Part IV




Now, the Communists can utilize a very precise
and effective move.

Instead of fighting powerful and free People of the USA,
they can, easily, identify the new, emerged power - the
Elite: lawyers-judges-politicians.

Now, the Communists have to concentrate only on the
narrowed top of the pyramid, as the top is most visible to all.


Prominent lawyers-judges-politicians can be influenced
by certain methods, as (they) numbers of targets to the
enemies are relatively low.

Most ambitious minds are the easiest to be hypnotized.

(A fact of the hypnotism)


Imagine if the enemies have to fight the whole Population?

They would, rather, narrow down on the elite
on the top of the pyramid and infiltrate
the ranks, using brainwashing techniques
that they have been researching since
the onset of the Communists' ideals.

Once they brainwash the top of the pyramid,
they accomplished what needed, as the brainwashed ones
at the time. i.e. the Elite, would brainwash the rest of the masses.

Whoever does not respond well, would be proclaimed as
"not a patriot" if not an enemy.


The more and louder are cries of patriotism, the more brainwashing is at stake.
A name of a country is irrelevant.



True patriotism is never loud, never excessive, and never involves the words "Government" and such.


True patriotism revolves around the People and not "geography."

It speaks with acts - not loud words!



If some may think that paranoia is the fundamental of
these writings, think again.

True thinking is based on research.

So research what Communists advocate and how.


Research the ultra low frequencies generated by the sound producing equipment, they
study in secrecy, which affect the psychic and mental state of humans.

The brain frequencies can be controlled in most humans from the outside.

Research powerful hypnosis techniques they have
been practicing for ages.

High tech science is at the frontier of the Communists,
as they love science and recognize only it and not God
or the basic Ten Commandments.

They have created their, own version of their God.

Their God, is their philosophy, which can't work in today's
world, as the history proved that above and beyond.

Their God is their, ruthless leader, who is wiling to destroy most of
his country but to get what he wants.

Their God is not your God and you are their enemy that
must be destroyed from within before, they can attempt
to move from the outside.

They are much more intelligent than many people
give them credit.

They learn to be patient and strike only when the
conditions have been properly prepared.

One of such conditions is to cause the antagonism
between the people and elite
and the destruction of the USA' Constitution
by

helping the lawyers-judge-politicians
gain more power at the expense of the
real Country - the People of the USA -

you!

Your Sovereignty is a threat to them, as no one can enslave the Sovereign People!

That's the Higher Law.

Only slaves can be enslaved, not the Sovereign minds.

[Sharing Lights]

Chapter 7


Anatomy of Stimulus-Response Mechanisms of Man



Man is a stimulus-response animal.

His entire reasoning
capabilities, even his ethics and morals, depend upon stimulus-
response machinery. This has long been demonstrated
by such Russians as Pavlov, and the principles have long been
used in handling the recalcitrant, in training children, and in bringing
about a state of optimum behavior on the part of a population.
Having no independent will of his own, Man is easily handled by
stimulus-response mechanisms. It is only necessary to install a stimulus
into the mental anatomy of Man to have that stimulus reactivate
and respond any time an exterior command source calls it into being.
The mechanisms of stimulus-response are easily understood. The
body takes pictures of every action in the environment around an
individual. When the environment includes brutality, terror, shock,
and other such activities, the mental image picture gained contains in
itself all the ingredients of the environment. If the individual himself
was injured during that moment, the injury itself will remanifest
when called upon to respond by an exterior command source.
As an example of this, if an individual is beaten and is told during
the entirety of the beating that he must obey certain officials, he will,
in the future, feel the beginnings of the pain the moment he begins to
disobey. The installed pain itself reacts as a policeman, for the experience
of the individual demonstrates to him that he cannot combat,
and will receive pain from, certain officials.
The mind can become very complex in its stimulus response. As
easily demonstrated in hypnotism, an entire chain of commands,
having to do with a great many complex actions, can be beaten,
shocked, or terrorized into a mind, and will there lie dormant until
called into action by some similarity in the circumstances of the environment
to the incident of punishment.
The response mechanism need only be reminded of some small
part of the stimulus to call into view the mental image picture and
cause the body to remember the pain connected with the "incident of
punishment". But so long as the individual obeys the picture, or follows
the commands of the stimulus implantation he is free from pain.
The behavior of children is regulated in this fashion in every civilized
country. The father, finding himself unable to bring about
immediate obedience and training on the part of his child, resorts to
physical violence, and after administering punishment of a physical
nature to the child on several occasions, is gratified to experience
complete obedience on the part of the child each time the father
speaks. In that parents are wont to be lenient with their children,
they seldom administer sufficient punishment to bring about optimum
obedience. The ability of the organism to withstand punishment
is great. Complete and implicit response can be gained only by
stimuli sufficiently brutal to injure the organism. The Kossack
method of breaking wild horses is a good example. The horse will
not restrain itself or take any of its rider’s commands. The rider,
wishing to break it, mounts and smashes a flask of strong Vodka
between the horse’s ears. The horse, struck to its knees, its eyes filled
with alcohol, mistaking the dampness for blood, instantly and thereafter
gives its attention to the rider and never needs further breaking.
Difficulty in breaking horses is occasioned only when light punishments
are administered. You often hear some mawkish sentimentality
about "breaking the spirit", but what you want here is an obedient
horse, and sufficient brutality brings about an obedient horse.
The stimulus-response mechanisms of the body are such that the
pain and the command subdivide so as to counter each other. The
mental image picture of the punishment will not become effective
upon the individual unless the command content is disobeyed. It is
pointed out in many early Russian writings that this is a survival
mechanism. It has already been well and thoroughly used in the survival
of communism.
It is only necessary to deliver into the organism a sufficient stimulus
to gain an adequate response.

[Sharing Lights]

So long as the organism obeys the stimulus whenever it is restimulated
in the future, it does not suffer from the pain of the stimulus.
But should it disobey the command content of the stimulus, the stimulus
reacts to punish the individual. Thus, we have an optimum circumstance,
and one of the basic principles of Psychopolitics. A sufficiently
installed stimulus will thereafter remain as a police mechanism
within the individual to cause him to follow the commands and
directions given to him. Should he fail to follow these commands
and directions, the stimulus mechanism will go into action. As the
commands are there with the moment of duress, the commands
themselves need never be repeated, and if the individual were to
depart thousands of miles away from the psychopolitical operative,
he will still obey the psychopolitical operative, or, himself, become
extremely ill and in agony. These principles, refined from the earliest
days of Pavlov, by constant and continuous Russian development,
have, at last, become of enormous use to us in our conquest.
Less modern and well-informed countries of Earth, lacking this
mechanism, fail to understand it, and coaxed into somnolence by our
own psychopolitical operatives, who discount and disclaim it, cannot
avoid succumbing to it.
The body is less able to resist a stimulus if it has insufficient food
and is weary. Therefore, it is necessary to administer all such stimuli
to individuals when their ability to resist has been reduced by privation
and exhaustion. Refusal to let them sleep over many days, or
denying them adequate food, produces an optimum state for the
receipt of a stimulus. If the person is then given an electrical shock,
and is told while the shock is in action that he must obey and do certain
things, he has no choice but to do them, or to reexperience,
because of his mental image picture of it, the electric shock. This
highly scientific and intensely workable mechanism cannot be overestimated
in the practice of psychopolitics.
Drugging the individual produces an artificial exhaustion, and if
he is drugged, or shocked and beaten, and given a string of commands,
his loyalties can be definitely rearranged. This is P.D.H., or
Pain-Drug Hypnosis.
The psychopolitical operative in training should be thoroughly
versed in the subject of hypnotism and post-hypnotic suggestion. He
should pay particular attention to the "forgetter mechanism" aspect
of hypnotism, which is to say, implantation in the unconscious mind.

[Sharing Lights]

He should note particularly that a person given a command in an
hypnotic state, and then told when still in that condition to forget it,
will execute it on a stimulus-response signal in the environment after
he has "awakened" from his hypnotic trance.
Having mastered these details fully, he should, by practicing upon
criminals and prisoners, or inmates available to him, produce the
hypnotic trance by drugs, and drive home post-hypnotic suggestions
by pain administered to the drugged person. He should then study
the reactions of the person when "awakened", and should give him
the stimulus-response signal which would throw into action the
commands given while the subject was in a drugged state of duress.
By much practice he can then learn the threshold dosages of various
drugs, and the amount of duress in terms of electric shock or addition
drug shock necessary to produce the optimum obedience to the
commands. He should also satisfy himself that there is no possible
method known to Man—there must be no possible method known to
Man—of bringing the patient into awareness of what has happened
to him, keeping him in a state of obedience and response while ignorant
of its cause.
Using criminals and prisoners, the psychopolitical operative in
training should then experiment with duress in the absence of privation,
administering electric shocks, beatings, and terror-inducing tactics,
accompanied by the same mechanisms as those employed in
hypnotism, and watch the conduct of the person when no longer
under duress.
The operative in training should carefully remark those who show
a tendency to protest, so that he may recognize possible recovery of
memory of the commands implanted. Purely for his own education,
he should then satisfy himself as to the efficacy of brain surgery in
disabling the nonresponsive prisoner.
The boldness of the psychopolitical operative can be increased
markedly by permitting back into society persons who have been
given pain-drug hypnosis and who have demonstrated symptoms of
rebelling or reinstating themselves in the society, if only to observe
how the label of "insanity" continues to discredit and discount the
statements of such persons.
Exercises in bringing about insanity seizures at will, simply by
demonstrating a signal to persons upon whom pain-drug hypnosis
has been used, and exercises in making the seizures come about
through talking to certain persons in certain places and times should
also be used.
Brain surgery, as developed in Russia, should also be practiced by
the psychopolitical operative in training, to give him full confidence
in 1) the crudeness with which it can be done, 2) the certainty of erasure
of the stimulus-response mechanism itself, 3) the production of
imbecility, idiocy, and discoordination on the part of the patient, and
4) the comparative lack of comment or public indignation occasioned
by casualties in brain surgery.
Exercises in sexual attack on patients should be practiced by the
psychopolitical operative to demonstrate the inability of the patient
under pain-drug hypnosis to recall the attack that has indoctrinated
him with a lust for further sexual activity. Sex, in all animals, is a
powerful motivator, and is no less so in the animal Man. The occasioning
of sexual liaison between females of a target family and wellchosen
males, under the control of the psychopolitical operative,
must be demonstrated to be possible with complete security for the
psychopolitical operative, thus putting into his hands an excellent
weapon for the breaking down of familial relations and consequent
public disgrace for the psychopolitical target.

[Sharing Lights]

Just as a dog can be trained, so can a man be trained. Just as a
horse can be trained, so can a man be trained. Sexual lust,
masochism, and any other desirable perversion can be induced by
pain-drug hypnosis and the techniques of Psychopolitics.
The changes of loyalties, allegiances, and sources of command can
be occasioned easily by psychopolitical technologies, and these
should be practiced and understood by the psychopolitical operative
before he begins to tamper with psychopolitical targets of any magnitude
or importance.
The actual simplicity of the subject of pain-drug hypnosis, the use
of electric shock, drugs, insanity-producing injections, and other
materials, should be masked entirely by technical nomenclature, by
the insistence on future benefit to the patient, by an authoritarian
pose and position, and by a careful cultivation and acquisition of
governmental positions in the country to be conquered.
Although the psychopolitical operative working in universities
where he can direct curricula of psychology classes is often tempted
to teach some of the principles of Psychopolitics to the susceptible
students in the psychology classes, he is enjoined not to do so.

He must limit his variations on the teaching of psychology to transmitting
the tenets of communism under the guise of psychology and do
so in a way that will cause the students to accept Communist tenets
as their own idea or as modern scientific thinking. The psychological
operative must not at any time educate students thoroughly in
stimulus-response mechanisms, and must not impart to them, save
those who are to become his fellow workers, the exact principles of
Psychopolitics. It is not necessary to do so, and it is dangerous.

to be continued to Chapter 8 later

[Sharing Lights]

Chapter 8


Degradation and conquest are companions.

In order to be conquered,
a nation must be degraded, either by acts of war, by
being overrun, by being forced into humiliating treaties of
peace, or by the treatment of her populace under the armies of the
conqueror.

However, degradation can be accomplished much more
insidiously and much more effectively by consistent and continual
defamation.

Defamation is the best and foremost weapon of Psychopolitics on
the broad field.


Continual and constant degradation of national leaders,
national institutions, national practices, and national heroes must
be systematically carried out, but this is the chief functions of
Communist Party Members, in general, not the psychopolitician.


The psychopolitician’s realm of defamation and degradation is
Man himself.


By attacking the character and morals of Man himself,
and by bringing about, through contamination of youth, a general
degraded feeling, command of the populace is facilitated to a marked
degree.


There is a curve of degradation that leads downward to a point
where the endurance of an individual is almost at an end, and any
sudden action toward him will place him in a state of shock.
Similarly, a soldier held prisoner can be abused, denied, defamed,
and degraded until the slightest motion on the part of his captors will
cause him to flinch.

Similarly, the slightest word on the part of his
captors will cause him to obey, or vary his loyalties and beliefs.

Given sufficient degradation, a prisoner can be caused
to murder his fellow countrymen in the same stockade. Experiments on German
prisoners have lately demonstrated that after seventy days of filthy
food, little sleep, and nearly untenable quarters, the least motion
toward the prisoner will bring about a state of shock beyond his
endurance threshold and will cause him to receive hypnotically anything
said to him.

Thus, it is possible, in an entire stockade of prisoners
numbering into the thousands, to bring about a state of complete
servile obedience, and without having to personally address
each one, to pervert their loyalties and implant in them adequate
commands to ensure their future conduct, even after their release to
their own people.


By lowering the endurance of a person, a group, or a nation, and
by constant degradation and defamation, a state of shock can be
induced that will cause an adequate response to any command.


The first thing to be degraded in any nation is the state of Man
himself.

Nations that have high ethical tone are difficult to conquer.

(SL: This is the key of keys!!!)


Their loyalties are hard to shake, their allegiance to their leaders is
fanatical, and what they usually call their spiritual integrity cannot
be violated by duress.


(SL: also read loyalty to morals and values, as such are more important than any leader.)
It is not efficient to attack a nation in such a
frame of mind.

It is the basic purpose of Psychopolitics to reduce that
state of mind to a point where it can be ordered and enslaved.

Thus,
the first target is Man himself.

He must be degraded from a spiritual
being to an animalistic reaction pattern.

He must think of himself
as an animal, capable only of animalistic reactions.

He must no
longer think of himself, or of his fellows, as capable of "spiritual
endurance", or nobility.


The best approach toward degradation in its first stages is the
propaganda of "scientific approach" to Man.

Man must be consistently
demonstrated to be a mechanism without individuality, and
the idea must be programmed into a populace under attack that
Man’s individualistic reactions are the products of mental derangement.


The populace must be made to believe that every individual
within it who rebels in any way, shape, or form against efforts and
activities to enslave the whole, must be considered to be a deranged
person whose eccentricities are neurotic or insane, and who must be
referred at once to the treatment of a psychopolitician (licensed as a
mental healer).


(SL: another key phrase.)

An optimum maneuver in such a program of degradation is to
address itself to the military forces of the nation, and
disabuse them rapidly from any belief other than that the disobedient one must be
subjected to "mental treatment".

The enslavement of a population
can fail only if these rebellious individuals are left to exert their individual
influence upon their fellow citizens, sparking them into rebellion,
calling into account their past nobility and ideals of freedom.