A similar email and/or direct on-line Petition
was submitted to:
all the Senators,
Congressmen,
and Assembly people, representing NY.
Quote:
To be updated list:
Already Submitted: to:
- the Department of Investigations of the City of New York,
- the Mayor of the City of New York,
Senators:
- Diane J. Savino 23rd District,
- Carl Kruger, 27 th District,
Assemblywoman:
- Adele Cohen.,
--------------------------------------------------
- Joseph L. Bruno , Temporary President and Majority Leader
- Dean G. Skelos , Deputy Majority Leader for Legislative Operations
|
Quote:
Neither Democrats not Republicans responded with a solution or even an attempt to it.
Not one!
|
Quote:
Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Sharing Light" <sharinglights@yahoo.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Subject: Please take action to protect Civil Rights
To: savino@senate.state.ny.us
|
Good day, dear Senator, Diane J. Savino!
Following a phone call to your Brooklyn office, I
and Citizens in similar situation
would like to
find out what elected Officials would do upon
abuse of Civil Rights being reported to them as
the former are elected to protect such Rights?
What are concrete steps that can be taken as
corruption in the Civil Court of NY: Kings County
is too deep and went too far unopposed?
Quote:
A Citizens’ report would be published on which
Official did what and when or who looked away in
accordance with the Citizen’s Rights for fair and
impartial Judicial process and how reports of
such abuse are handled.
|
All correspondence would be retained or the
absence of it to show by the record which branch
of the Government responded by actions and which
did not for the improvement of Peoples’
representation.
Quote:
Already Submitted to the Department of
Investigations of the City of New York & the
Mayor:
|
Urgent: Court corruption unopposed: Kings County
– Civil & Housing.
I have evidence & by Civil duty must report
corruption committed in the Civil Court of New
York: Kings County by the Judges who violate law
(have copies or records proving that) as well as
there is clear evidence of tampering with court
file, including documents from the file
disappearing as I know personally what was there
and substantial quantity of it being mailed back
to me, while it must be in the Court at all
times.
I speak of my case and not hearsay.
Therefore, conspiracy to aid the Plaintiff is
achieved by the tampering substituting already
submitted to Court and notarized timely
opposition on record as non-existent.
Furthermore:
false entries in the Court system
were made,
uncontested adjournments,
ex-parte
communications, and
refusal of Judge to enforce
law upon being notified of the violations of it:
as principal is not licensed and seized to exist;
Denial by the Judge to let a Pro Se litigant to
see the file of his case; forced eviction of a
tenant while all rent has been paid and no
violation were done by such
Quote:
(Judge Gary Marton
case who overruled the Appellate Term being a
lower Judge just to help the law firm he is
supporting – Gutman, Mintz, Baker;)
|
Favorable treatment of the Law Firm Counsel of
which perjured herself on the record;
Denial of basic, Civil rights of Pro Se Litigant
for a fair and no-arbitrary hearing; Refusal of
the Chief Judge of the Court to address the
issues;
Open
harassment of the Pro Se litigant.
Precise
evidence is available and need to be submitted in
person if an appointment can be granted since
it is going on in this case, that must be going
on with many, other cases.
Too many Pro Se Litigants leave Court crying,
helpless, with deep hate toward the system,
provoked to commit crimes at times, as loose trust
in the Justice System.
When they
complain to the Chief Judge, she, never,
comes out to address the complaint, while her
court attorney always makes excuses for any
wrongdoing as if she witnessed that.
Pro Se leave defeated but it is Justice
that is defeated there
for now.
Even though, that can’t be a reflection
on decent Judges who practice real Law but there
are too few of them – too few!
That can not
continue unopposed Law is not followed but
manipulated there as that pleases the agenda of
these individuals who see
reappointment by the
supporting law firms and lobbying groups despite
the Constitution of the US.
Stipulations between law firms and Pro Se
litigants are allowed to transpire without
presence of Judges which violates rights of the
Pro Se, who don’t even understand fully what sign
and agree being manipulated into it as in the
case of:
Quote:
Forster & Garbus Law Firm: Brandi P.
Klineberg Esq.
|
as such conduct was witnessed by
me as well as offered to me on same improper
terms.
The true reason why the corrupt Judges cater to
some law firms later so actively as that is not
so much the case vs. Pro Se as mush as
Quote:
mutual
support-corruption by/for their supporting
corporate agenda represented by the same law
firms which make a living at that Court and that is
the bare truth!!!
|
Quote:
Absence of fair election and
true, Judicial process can not lead to anything
but wild corruption out of control.
|
It is time to investigate the Court or crimes
would continue even more.
Quote:
If one believes that
corruption is only confined to the Supreme Court
in Brooklyn, the Civil Division is involved in
that much more actively and without any checks
and balances, being practically completely one
party system heavily appointed by the already
indicted individuals who passed on their legacy.
|
That just must change as such corruption the
result of the absence of check in balances.
Anything out of control is doomed for failure –
that is the lesson of History repeating itself!

The Chief judge
There is one more
Judge to my knowledge who may have violated the
law but at this time as the evidence is
incomplete the name is withheld
Quote:
as only
unquestionable evidence is at the core of this
report and anything partial would not serve
justice.
|
Wiretapping for getting these Judges on the
audio tape and proper investigation is needed to
get violation on record for the DA case and not
to expose the investigation prematurely as that
would only entrench the corruption deeper till
only to surface later even with more force.
Penal Law
Sections 175.20 and 175.25
Deals with tampering with public records in the
second and first degrees.
Because such tampering
constitutes either a class A misdemeanor or a
class D felony, persons can be prosecuted and, if
convicted, sentenced accordingly for these
offenses.
Public Officers Law
Section 80
Requires that outgoing public officials deliver
official records to their successors in office
and outlines legal action to take if this
transfer is not completed.