08-31-2006, 06:10 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,010
|
|
|
IRS Authority is Only for BATF Activity
Note: there are several attached images of documents at the bottom of this article:
The Lawrence Dismissal was caused by Robert Lawrence firmly planting the OMB# for the 1040 Form on the federal court record. This opened the door, if convicted for a federal judge to have to opine about the fact that criminal IRS prosecutions can only be enforced over territorial US activity or BATF (Title 27 U.S.C.) activity.
http://friends-n-family-research.inf..._backs_off.wav
Take a look for yourselves. This is the verbiage about tax collection with authority in criminal prosecutions.
I especially like the (last) attachment from Miscellaneous provisions of Sec. 7608, indicating only BATF agents have the authority to carry firearms.
That is an interesting tell.
Last edited by David Merrill : 09-02-2006 at 08:35 AM.
|
10-02-2006, 05:59 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,010
|
|
|
I recently got a PM from somebody directly associated with the IMF Decoder project(s) telling me I was dead-on target about the PRA Issue and the OMB# Fiasco. I told that member to cut and paste the PM for everybody but have not seen it yet.
The gist was logical and quite direct; the inquiry was how to link the OMB# to the Federal Register - what I have been calling the OMB# Fiasco. The reason for the Lawrence Dismissal. The CFR above is the Federal Register folks...
I am having fun with all this and will have more snippets to add later.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|
11-23-2007, 08:46 AM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,020
|
|
|
I need to use this info and need to bump it to the top so I do not have to play hide and seek with it.
Excellent info.
|
11-23-2007, 09:13 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,010
|
|
|
Nice compliment; thanks.
|
11-23-2007, 10:02 AM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 676
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Merrill
I recently got a PM from somebody directly associated with the IMF Decoder project(s) telling me I was dead-on target about the PRA Issue and the OMB# Fiasco. I told that member to cut and paste the PM for everybody but have not seen it yet.
The gist was logical and quite direct; the inquiry was how to link the OMB# to the Federal Register - what I have been calling the OMB# Fiasco. The reason for the Lawrence Dismissal. The CFR above is the Federal Register folks...
I am having fun with all this and will have more snippets to add later.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|
David,
Was the gist of this that the codification of a master file is to place one in the category of a privileged activity which in turn provided the presumption that the IRS, through BATF, has jurisdiction?
__________________
Liberty: Freedom from restraint and the power to follow one's own will to choose a course of conduct. Liberty, like freedom, has its inherent restraint to act without harm to others and within the accepted rules of conduct for the benefit of the general public.
|
11-23-2007, 10:06 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,010
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FreeFromContract
David,
Was the gist of this that the codification of a master file is to place one in the category of a privileged activity which in turn provided the presumption that the IRS, through BATF, has jurisdiction?
|
Morelike the privilege of being "resident" or actively involved with alcohol, tobacco or firearms.
Regards,
David Merrill.
Last edited by David Merrill : 11-23-2007 at 10:57 AM.
|
11-23-2007, 10:26 AM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 676
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Merrill
Morelike the privelege of being "resident" or actively involved with alcohol, tobacco or firearms.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|
OK, I get the A,T,F bit, and now you also mention "resident". It appears to me that the IRS uses the resident and non-resident confusion in their code independent of the A,T,F nexus.
__________________
Liberty: Freedom from restraint and the power to follow one's own will to choose a course of conduct. Liberty, like freedom, has its inherent restraint to act without harm to others and within the accepted rules of conduct for the benefit of the general public.
|
11-23-2007, 11:02 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,010
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FreeFromContract
OK, I get the A,T,F bit, and now you also mention "resident". It appears to me that the IRS uses the resident and non-resident confusion in their code independent of the A,T,F nexus.
|
People have reported that the IMF decodes them to be domiciled in the Virgin Islands or Guam. In two instances with suitors; whom I have direct testimony, since they had remedy perfected and the cognizance of the US, the Treasury simply sent a letter saying they were not obligated by FOIA to provide the IMF.
Example attached.
Regards,
David Merrill.
Last edited by David Merrill : 11-23-2007 at 11:17 AM.
|
11-23-2007, 10:00 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,020
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Merrill
I recently got a PM from somebody directly associated with the IMF Decoder project(s) telling me I was dead-on target about the PRA Issue and the OMB# Fiasco. I told that member to cut and paste the PM for everybody but have not seen it yet.
The gist was logical and quite direct; the inquiry was how to link the OMB# to the Federal Register - what I have been calling the OMB# Fiasco. The reason for the Lawrence Dismissal. The CFR above is the Federal Register folks...
I am having fun with all this and will have more snippets to add later.
Regards,
David Merrill.
|
I think you were pretty much dead on with the PRA OMB# "fiasco."
It leads to delegation issues, and they do not want, cannot afford to have somebody stumble onto that path.
PRA is a small part of the Administrative Procedures Act, as far as I know.
APA will/can probably lead to where they do not want to go.
Or maybe I am wrong. |
11-23-2007, 10:50 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,010
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mrg
I think you were pretty much dead on with the PRA OMB# "fiasco."
It leads to delegation issues, and they do not want, cannot afford to have somebody stumble onto that path.
PRA is a small part of the Administrative Procedures Act, as far as I know.
APA will/can probably lead to where they do not want to go.
Or maybe I am wrong.
|
Even though it is obvious to me, mainly the Delegation of Authority 120-10 being unsigned - never signed by the Secretary, I was never involved or even very interested in proving it.
Regards,
David Merrill. |
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
