Credit River Money Decision

[David Merrill]

I like the style of this webpage:

http://www.livingdebtfree.info/
http://www.livingdebtfree.info/manifesto.pdf

[David Merrill]

THE CREDIT RIVER DECISION

INTRODUCTION


A Minnesota Trial Court's decision holding the Federal Reserve Act unconstitutional and VOID; holding the National Banking Act unconstitutional and VOID; declaring a mortgage acquired by the First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota in the regular course of its business, along with the foreclosure and the sheriff's sale, to be VOID.

This decision, which is legally sound, has the effect of declaring all private mortgages on real and personal property, and all U.S. and State bonds held by the Federal Reserve, National and State Banks to be null and VOID. This amounts to an emancipation of this nation from personal, national and State debt purportedly owed to this banking system. Every True American owes it to himself/herself, to his or her country, and to the people of the world for that matter, to study this decision very carefully and to understand it, for upon it hangs the question of freedom or slavery.

A WORD FROM AN ASSOCIATE JUSTICE WHO KNEW AND WORKED WITH JUSTICE MARTIN V. MAHONEY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, ABOUT THE CASE.

The "Credit River Decision" handed down by a jury of 12 on a cold day in December, in the Credit River Township Hall, was an experience that I'll never forget.

The Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court had phoned me a week before the trial and asked me if I would be an associate justice in assisting Justice Martin V. Mahoney since he had never handled a jury trial before. I accepted, and it took me two hours to get my car running in the 22 below zero weather.

I got to the court room about 30 minutes before trial, and helped get the wood stove going, since the trial was being held in an unheated store room of a general store. This was the first time I met Justice Mahoney, and I was impressed with his no nonsense manner of handling matters before him. My OB was to help pick the jury, and to keep Jerome Daly and the attorney representing the Bank of Montgomery from engaging in a fist fight. The court room was highly charged, and the Jury was all business.

The banker testified about the mortgage loan given to Jerome Daly, but then Daly cross examined the banker about the creating of money "out of thin air," and the banker admitted that this was standard banking practice. When Justice Mahoney heard the banker testify that he could "create money out of thin air," Mahoney said, "It sounds like fraud to me." I looked at the faces of the jurors, and they were all agreeing with Mahoney by shaking their heads and by the looks on their faces.

I must admit that up until that point, I really didn't believe Jerome's theory, and thought he was making this up. After I heard the testimony of the banker, my mouth had dropped open in shock, and I was in complete disbelief. There was no doubt in my mind that the Jury would find for Daly.

Jerome Daly had taken on the banks, the Federal Reserve Banking System, and the money lenders, and had won.

It is now twenty eight years since this "Landmark Decision," and Justice Mahoney is quoted more often than any Supreme Court justice ever was. The money boys that run the "private Federal Reserve Bank" soon got back at Mahoney by poisoning him in what appeared to have been a fishing boat accident (but with his body pumped full of poison) in June of 1969, less than 6 months later.

Both Jerome Daly and Justice Martin V. Mahoney are truly the greatest men that I have ever had the pleasure to meet. The Credit River Decision was and still is the most important legal decision ever decided by a Jury.

Bill Drexler

[Shoonra]

Both Daly and Drexler were both disbarred shortly after this charade, and went on to lose dozens of court cases involving their anti-tax fantasies. Someone here was kind enough to post Mahoney's death certificate, which makes it clear that he died of chronic alcoholism. The notion that he was murdered for his part in this circus is ludicrous; how come nobody went after Daly or Drexler?

[Codee]

Because they only go after people that break prommisses that have been made to them.

[David Merrill]

The case never got into appeal because the trial court barred "payment" with Federal Reserve Notes.

Shoonra can only attack the Credit River Money Decision on the merits of bankruptcy courts protecting the Fed. She will not assert any argument about the nature of mortgages. That is probably what has her vocal about CRMD being a circus.... how eloquently stated the nature of a private credit loan is on this website:

http://www.livingdebtfree.info/
http://www.livingdebtfree.info/manifesto.pdf

And as far as I can see, the people at livingdebtfree don't resort to the CRMD at all. The judgment and decree of the CRMD are perfectly true and factual. It just upsets a lot of people like Shoonra that people can understand the nature of debt with debt-based currency.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Sharing Lights]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

Both Daly and Drexler were both disbarred shortly after this charade, and went on to lose dozens of court cases involving their anti-tax fantasies. Someone here was kind enough to post Mahoney's death certificate, which makes it clear that he died of chronic alcoholism. The notion that he was murdered for his part in this circus is ludicrous; how come nobody went after Daly or Drexler?

"anti-tax fantasies?"


Could you, please, elaborate further so that no one is mislead?



"Someone here was kind enough to post Mahoney's death certificate, which makes it clear that he died of chronic alcoholism."

I, respectfully, raise a logical argument:

a chronic alcoholic may be:

a) still, murdered

and/or

b) driven/provoked to destructive behavior.


c) may die of natural causes, indeed.


Truth is whole - not partial.

[David Merrill]

"Someone here was kind enough to post Mahoney's death certificate, which makes it clear that he died of chronic alcoholism."

Shoonra tries to attack the truth of the Judgment and Decree with that?

According to all the liquor stores, all able to pay rent and support employees and owners, sometimes as dense as one liquor store for every two or three blocks, there are a lot of people with chronic alcoholism in the world these days. Funny how these people function professionally by day. The Judgment and Decree shows no sign of Mahoney's alleged alcoholism. Shoonra's post shows sign of a desperate attempt to discredit the CRMD.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Sharing Lights]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Shoonra tries to attack the truth of the Judgment and Decree with that?

According to all the liquor stores, all able to pay rent and support employees and owners, sometimes as dense as one liquor store for every two or three blocks, there are a lot of people with chronic alcoholism in the world these days. Funny how these people function professionally by day. The Judgment and Decree shows no sign of Mahoney's alleged alcoholism. Shoonra's post shows sign of a desperate attempt to discredit the CRMD.



Regards,

David Merrill.

Dear David!

I may not comment on Shoonra, as do not
have enough knowledge of her ( I apologize, as earlier,
I referred to her as him, by assumption
[another lesson to me to never assume anything at all.] )



Yet, I can, logically, raise another argument.

You, are correct to state that the case, itself,
and the supporting laws from which the ruling was
derived are of true merit and not an incomplete
reference to the mortal outcome of the human being in
discussion.

All, who follow common sense, may agree that:

The Judgment and Decree

based on evidence would constitute way more
credibility, unless fraud was at play,
than a conclusive allegation, not, even, supported by
any court acceptable evidence.


I can, add further, that,
since my intuition led me to exploring your writings
and posts deeper, as well as
reading the opposition provided in an attempt to
discredit the latter, I can state the following.

Being, a completely, neutral party,
and only proceeding by evidence on record,
further research to verify the findings stated (as I verify
as much as I can,)
and common sense,
I have, yet,
seen one post anywhere,
where your arguments and evidence
have been opposed
by substance and facts.

As all the "attacks" vs. you
have been based on trivial and contradictory, often,
defying logic, opposition,
that has built your reputation in the eyes of many
reasonable readers
as of a human being of the highest judicial,
ethical, research-wise skills, and moral
convictions/abilities.

Your adversaries, by trying to undermine you, have,
only, uplifted you higher.

One day, when my, own research would, eventually,
bring considerable following in numbers more than some
may envision, for now, I would, recommend all those
who read me to study, literally, study
the wealth of knowledge and integrity that you share
with all already.

I have confidence that, once, the readers comprehend
the depth and sheer data, leading to
solutions to many problems in the over-
corrupted legal field,
they can rely and benefit from the one who takes it
in the opposite direction -
toward what is was meant to be!

We, would be honored, literally, to read
your
knowledge that you, share with all, undoubtedly,
sincerely and based on morals of empowering the People
with self-reliance - not dependence.

It took me a long time to find an honorable judge
in the US.

I am so grateful to Providence for having you here.

One day, many people would understand me well and
realize how accurate I have been in my predictions.


You would make a real impact from
the legal field to the People - I predict so fully!

My feelings may betray me - not intuition,
as I am in the Solar mode.

God Bless, dear David Merrill, as you
have the Honor indeed!

[Sharing Lights]

Judge Martin Mahoney wrote the following about a case he ruled over, The First National Bank of Montgomery v. Jerome Daly, December 7, 1968: (See 17 Am. Jur. 85, 215, and 1 Mer. Jur. 2nd on Actions, Section 550)


"There is no lawful consideration for these Federal Reserve Notes to circulate as money. The banks actually obtained these notes for the cost of printing. A lawful consideration must exist for a note...
"The activity of the Federal Reserve Banks...and the First National Bank of Montgomery, is contrary to public policy and contrary to the Constitution of the United States, and constitutes an unlawful creation of money and credit for no valuable consideration. Activity of said banks in creating money and credit is not warranted by the Constitution of the United States.

"The Federal Reserve Banks and National Banks exercise an exclusive monopoly and privilege of creating credit and issuing notes at the expense of the public, which does not receive a fair equivalent. This scheme is obliquely designed for the benefit of an idle monopoly to rob, blackmail, and oppress the producers of wealth [you and me and our ability to work and be productive].

"The Federal Reserve Act and the National Bank Act are, in their operation and effect, contrary to the whole letter and spirit of the Constitution of the United States, for they confer an unlawful and unnecessary power on private parties; they hold all of our fellow citizens in dependence; they are subversive to the rights and liberation of the people.

"These Acts have defied the lawfully constituted Government of the United States. The Federal Reserve Act and National Banking Act are not necessary and proper for carrying into execution the legislative powers granted to Congress [See Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States] or any other powers vested in the government of the United States, but on the contrary, are subversive to the rights of the People in their rights to life, liberty, and property...

"No rights can be acquired by fraud. The Federal Reserve Notes are acquired through the use of unconstitutional statutes and fraud. The law leaves wrongdoers where it finds them. Slavery and all its incidents, including peonage, thralldom, and the debt created by fraud is universally prohibited in the United States. This case represents but another refined form of slavery by the bankers. Their position is not supported by the Constitution of the United States."

Two weeks after Judge Mahoney ruled in favor of Daly, and wrote the above, he was assassinated.


In an attempt to expose what the banking cartel was doing, Congressman Charles Lindburg (correction - Lindberg, second correction - Lindbergh) read a letter he had received anonymously. This was in 1917. The letter is called The Banker's Manifesto.

Mr. Lindbergh's grandson (corrected from "son") was kidnapped, after he exsposed the bankers.
Another coincidence. Is it not?


Then JFK.
He did provide some opposition to bankers too and even
tried to implement some changes....


The result?
Another coincidences, as well a very strange chain of event leading to that.

Look at that, just coincidences after coincidences and each time, the innocent banks are in the center of the assassinations or kidnapings.

I believe in chances no more that in a chance that space dust just accidentally formed in such way as to create human beings and all life!

Only Cause-Effect rule the Cosmos, Earth being a part of it, not chances or coincidence!
Amen!

[David Merrill]

Thank you.