Credit River Money Decision

[Sharing Lights]

Illuminati "Slush" Fund



http://rense.com/general70/cash.htm



Justice Martin V. Mahoney who was found suspiciously poisoned to death
six months after he issued the ruling that exposed the illegality of
what has been called the Queen of England's illegal banking scam.



The banker testified about the mortgage loan given to Jerome Daly, but
then Daly cross examined the banker about the creating of money "out of
thin air," and the banker admitted that this was standard banking
practice.


Before looking at some of the startling information behind how the
"Illuminati banksters" create money out of thin air, ask why the 1968
Minnesota Trial Court's decision holding the Federal Reserve Act
unconstitutional and void and holding the National Banking Act
unconstitutional and void was never appealed or vacated?

The answer is even the legal manipulators and corrupted high court
judges can't get around this decision, figuring it better to just let
the case of the First National Bank of Montgomery v. Jerome Daly die in
the cold Minnesota snow along with Justice Martin V. Mahoney who was
found suspiciously poisoned to death six months after he issued the
ruling that exposed the illegality of what has been called the Queen of
England's illegal banking scam.

This decision, which is still good law, has the effect of declaring
all private mortgages on real and personal property, and all U.S. and
State bonds held by the Federal Reserve, National and State Banks to
void.

According to legal scholars and Bill Drexler, who worked on the case
with Judge Mahoney, "This amounts to an emancipation of this nation
from personal, national and State debt purportedly owed to this banking
system. Every True American owes it to himself/herself, to his or her
country, and to the people of the world for that matter, to study this
decision very carefully and to understand it, for upon it hangs the
question of freedom or slavery."

Saying this was the most important jury decision of modern times,
Drexler who was present in the Minnesota courtroom the day the decision
came down, added:

The banker testified about the mortgage loan given to Jerome Daly, but
then Daly cross examined the banker about the creating of money "out of
thin air," and the banker admitted that this was standard banking
practice.

When Justice Mahoney heard the banker testify that he could
"create money out of thin air," Mahoney said, "It sounds like fraud to
me." I looked at the faces of the jurors, and they were all agreeing
with Mahoney by shaking their heads and by the looks on their faces."

Both Jerome Daly and Justice Martin V. Mahoney are truly the greatest
men that I have ever had the pleasure to meet. The Credit River
Decision was and still is the most important legal decision ever
decided by a Jury."

Daly, a small town mortgage holder who had taken on and defeated the
Federal Reserve Banking System and money lenders, had this to say about
the decision the Illumnati big shots kill for, as well as making any
enterprising young lawyer think twice about tackling the Federal
Reserve.

[David Merrill]

I think Shoonra keeps saying that a justice of the peace cannot form a competent jury in common law? Well I guess that shows her to follow a different master - the International and lower Bar Associations. Where one must be an attorney to wear a black robe.


Regards,

David Merrill.


[I mean it should be obvious to the most casual observer that if you wanted a cause heard by peers, you would enlist the services of a justice of the peace.]

[Shoonra]

Originally Posted by Sharing Lights

1 Mer. Jur. 2nd on Actions, Section 550

Still no explanation of this citation.

Originally Posted by Sharing Lights

Two weeks after Judge Mahoney ruled in favor of Daly, and wrote the above, he was assassinated.

Everyone else puts it at nearer six months. And he was a JP not a judge. And he "assassinated" himself by way of his own alocholism.

Originally Posted by Sharing Lights

....In an attempt to expose what the banking cartel was doing, Congressman Charles Lindburg (correction - Lindberg) read a letter he had received anonymously. This was in 1917....

Even your corrections are wrong: The name is Lindbergh. This "expose" came AFTER he had lost the 1916 election.

Originally Posted by Sharing Lights

...Mr. Lindberg's grandson was kidnapped, after he exsposed the bankers.
Another coincidence. Is it not?

I'm sure it made a terrific impression since the former Congressman was 20 years out of office and 8 years in the grave. Definitely "after" the expose.
The fact that the kidnapper did it for money, and was caught, with the ransom money in his possession, etc., ... how does that fit into your fantasy?

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

Still no explanation of this citation.



Everyone else puts it at nearer six months. And he was a JP not a judge. And he "assassinated" himself by way of his own alocholism.


Even your corrections are wrong: The name is Lindbergh. This "expose" came AFTER he had lost the 1916 election.


I'm sure it made a terrific impression since the former Congressman was 20 years out of office and 8 years in the grave. Definitely "after" the expose.
The fact that the kidnapper did it for money, and was caught, with the ransom money in his possession, etc., ... how does that fit into your fantasy?

She has you arguing about the only point that is supported by evidence for her - Mahoney's suspicious death. Jerry Maas the neighbor of the Mahoneys, clerk of Credit River Township today, tells me the Mahoneys and about everybody who thinks about it anymore believes Martin was poisoned and the alcoholism was a fabricated suicide.

A judge to Shoonra must have a Bar card. That really explains the rest. One would logically in common law go to a justice of the peace for convention of jury of peers. A state citizen would not convene a jury of US citizens as Shoonra dictates proper.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Sharing Lights]

Shoonra: Still no explanation of this citation.

As I have stated, you are more than welcomed to do the research.
As, maybe, then, you, after the first hand experience,
may look at the data differently.
Or, do you expect me to do that for you?





Everyone else puts it at nearer six months. And he was a JP not a judge.


David answered it precisely, as pertaining to the
Common Law, which the Bar opposes as only it can.

JP term is correct; so is the authority and right for jury,
assembly as it had commenced indeed.

No laws have been violated there.

Your argument is out of the scope of the core of the
issue, regarding JP.

You may not be aware of the attempts to poison
(ordered assault on his life) - you are aware of the date
he was pronounced dead.

The statement above contains the answer to your allegation.

And he "assassinated" himself by way of his own alcoholism.

Respectfully disagree and can't comprehend from
where you derive such, ABSOLUTE
assurance?

You testify for facts/data/premises not available to you,
despite the opposite to be more likely:
a considerable research and more indications
of a forced death than your, unsubstantiated claims.

You may argue, further, that those of us who allege the
foul-play may not state so, according to precise evidence.

We, respectfully reply, that, even though, we may not
state -"beyond a reasonable doubt -" there is much more credibility to the
forced death data than to the alleged death from
alcoholism only.

Furthermore, you have defaulted
in your answer to the facts of the
other "coincidental" deaths or hostile acts the people
who opposed the financiers to some degree.

To me, it is absurd to believe that the most powerful
Cartel in the world: the Federal Reserve, would not use its tremendous force,
connections, and influence to negate the
opposite as it fits its purpose.

In which reality do you live?

I state that the owners who
run the Cartel are not the people ruled by
morals or ethics in a slightest degree
and who would stop before going as far as it takes them
in pursuit of their goals.
That is self-evident.

(I would post some data in the following posts to substantiate this further.)

The rulers of the FR have even more than implied so in
quite clear terms in their Manifestos.


Even your corrections are wrong: The name is Lindbergh. This "expose" came AFTER he had lost the 1916 election.


The first spelling error was unintentional and I did admit
it and apologize.

Didn't I?

As I only proceed by personal knowledge, when that
relates to the people
participating in a debate, I do not form an
opinion of them contrary to the latter.

(if you recall my "abstinence" on commenting prior to that?)

A second misspelling was intentional and
a small test
(esoterically) for me to see your reaction, particularly
when:

I admitted the error
and
apologized.

The spirit behind your
responses, (quotes left intact,) gave me that first hand
knowledge of

how the person responds to trivial
things and in what spirit, as opposed to the core of the
matter.

I do not need much to capture the essence.

I would not comment on that, as all could discern on
their own.
You did spell "Lindbergh" correctly...


I'm sure it made a terrific impression since the former Congressman was 20 years out of office and 8 years in
the grave. Definitely "after" the expose.
The fact that the kidnapper did it for money, and was caught, with the ransom money in his possession, etc., ... how does that fit into your fantasy?


I noticed that you used the word
"fantasy" on anything that does not not
please your "fancy."

You arguments that
you fail to support by evidence and common sense, as
well as default on the real issue of
Unconstitutionality of the income taxes and the fraud of
the FR, leaves a void in your opposition which you fulfill,
mainly, with the rebut by the term "fantasy."

Not much of opposition by substance,
then, I must add.

[Sharing Lights]

The Bankers Manifesto of 1892
2005 07 02

Revealed by US Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. from Minnesota before the US Congress sometime during his term of office between the years of 1907 and 1917 to warn the citizens.

"We (the bankers) must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion.

Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance.

The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them.

At the coming Omaha Convention to be held July 4th (1892), our men must attend and direct its movement, or else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome.

This at the present time would be premature.

We are not yet ready for such a crisis.

Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination ( conspiracy) and legislation.

When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers.

People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.

History repeats itself in regular cycles.

This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world.

While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism.

By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expand their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd.

Thus, by discrete action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished."

Revealed by Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. to the U.S. Congress sometime between 1907 and 1917.

THE BANKERS’ MANIFESTO OF 1934

Article from: http://www.mayanmajix.com/art430.html

[David Merrill]

And he "assassinated" himself by way of his own alcoholism.

I recall somewhere around here are the images of the death certification. That assessment was mysteriously made three weeks after Martin's death?

[Sharing Lights]

Secrets of the Federal Reserve

The history, organization and controlling interests behind the Federal Reserve
-- by Eustace Mullins, 1983


Chapter 1: Jekyll Island

Paul Warburg and the Jekyll Island conference of 1910
The Jekyll Island Hunt Club
The Plan for a New Central Bank
Footnotes

"The matter of a uniform discount rate was discussed and settled at Jekyll Island."
--Paul M. Warburg [1]

The Jekyll Island Hunt Club
On the night of November 22, 1910, a group of newspaper reporters stood disconsolately in the railway station at Hoboken, New Jersey. They had just watched a delegation of the nation's leading financiers leave the station on a secret mission. It would be years before they discovered what that mission was, and even then they would not understand that the history of the United States underwent a drastic change after that night in Hoboken.

The delegation had left in a sealed railway car, with blinds drawn, for an undisclosed destination. They were led by Senator Nelson Aldrich, head of the National Monetary Commission. President Theodore Roosevelt had signed into law the bill creating the National Monetary Commission in 1908, after the tragic Panic of 1907 had resulted in a public outcry that the nation's monetary system be stabilized. Aldrich had led the members of the Commission on a two-year tour of Europe, spending some three hundred thousand dollars of public money. He had not yet made a report on the results of this trip, nor had he offered any plan for banking reform.

Accompanying Senator Aldrich at the Hoboken station were his private secretary, Shelton; A. Piatt Andrew, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, and Special Assistant of the National Monetary Commission; Frank Vanderlip, president of the National City Bank of New York; Henry P. Davison, senior partner of J.P. Morgan Company, and generally regarded as Morgan's personal emissary; and Charles D. Norton, president of the Morgan-dominated First National Bank of New York. Joining the group just before the train left the station were Benjamin Strong, also known as a lieutenant of J.P. Morgan; and Paul Warburg, a recent immigrant from Germany who had joined the banking house of Kuhn, Loeb

Six years later, a financial writer named Bertie Charles Forbes who later founded the Forbes Magazine (the present editor, Malcom Forbes, is his son) wrote:

"Picture a party of the nation's greatest bankers stealing out of New York on a private railroad car under cover of darkness, stealthily hieing hundred of miles South, embarking on a mysterious launch, sneaking onto an island deserted by all but a few servants, living there a full week under such rigid secrecy that the names of not one of them was once mentioned lest the servants learn the identity and disclose to the world this strangest, most secret expedition in the history of American finance. I am not romancing; I am giving to the world, for the first time, the real story of how the famous Aldrich currency report, the foundation of our new currency system, was written . . . .

The utmost secrecy was enjoined upon all. The public must not glean a hint of what was to be done. Senator Aldrich notified each one to go quietly into a private car of which the railroad had received orders to draw up on an unfrequented platform. Off the party set. New York's ubiquitous reporters had been foiled . . . Nelson (Aldrich) had confided to Henry, Frank, Paul and Piatt that he was to keep them locked up at Jekyll Island, out of the rest of the world, until they had evolved and compiled a scientific currency system for the United States, the real birth of the present Federal Reserve System, the plan done on Jekyll Island in the conference with Paul, Frank and Henry . . . . Warburg is the link that binds the Aldrich system and the present system together. He more than any one man has made the system possible as a working reality." [2]


The official biography of Senator Nelson Aldrich states:

"In the autumn of 1910, six men went out to shoot ducks, Aldrich, his secretary Shelton, Andrews, Davison, Vanderlip and Warburg. Reporters were waiting at the Brunswick (Georgia) station. Mr. Davison went out and talked to them. The reporters dispersed and the secret of the strange journey was not divulged. Mr. Aldrich asked him how he had managed it and he did not volunteer the information." [3]

Davison had an excellent reputation as the person who could conciliate warring factions, a role he had performed for J.P. Morgan during the settling of the Money Panic of 1907. Another Morgan partner, T.W. Lamont, says: "Henry P. Davison served as arbitrator of the Jekyll Island expedition." [4]

[Sharing Lights]

From these references, it is possible to piece together the story. Aldrich's private car, which had left Hoboken station with its shades drawn, had taken the financiers to Jekyll Island, Georgia. Some years earlier, a very exclusive group of millionaires, led by J.P. Morgan, had purchased the island as a winter retreat. They called themselves the Jekyll Island Hunt Club, and at first the island was used only for hunting expeditions until the millionaires realized that its pleasant climate offered a warm retreat from the rigors of winters in New York, and began to build splendid mansions which they called "cottages" for their families' winter vacations. The club building itself, being quite isolated, was sometimes in demand for stag parties and other pursuits unrelated to hunting. On such occasions, the club members who were not invited to these specific outings were asked not to appear there for a certain number of days. Before Nelson Aldrich's party had left New York, the club's members had been notified that the club would be occupied for the next two weeks.

The Jekyll Island Club was chosen as the place to draft the plan for control of the money and credit of the people of the United States, not only because of its isolation, but also because it was the private preserve of the people who were drafting the plan. The New York Times later noted, on May 3, 1931, in commenting on the death of George F. Baker, one of J.P. Morgan's closest associates, that "Jekyll Island Club has lost one of its most distinguished members. One-sixth of the total wealth of the world was represented by the members of the Jekyll Island Club." Membership was by inheritance only.

The Aldrich group had no interest in hunting. Jekyll Island was chosen for the site of the preparation of the central bank because it offered complete privacy, and because there was not a journalist within fifty miles. Such was the need for secrecy that the members of the party agreed, before arriving at Jekyll Island, that no last names would be used at any time during their two week stay. The group later referred to themselves as the "First Name Club", as the last names of Warburg, Strong, Vanderlip and the others were prohibited during their stay. The customary attendants had been given two week vacations from the club, and new servants brought in from the mainland for this occasion who did not know the names of any of those present. Even if they had been interrogated after the Aldrich party went back to New York, they could not have given the names. This arrangement proved to be so satisfactory that the members, limited to those who had actually been present at Jekyll Island, later had a number of informal get-togethers in New York.

Why all this secrecy? Why this thousand mile trip in a closed railway car to a remote hunting club? Ostensibly, it was to carry out a program of public service, to prepare banking reform which would be a boon to the people of the United States, which had been ordered by the National Monetary Commission. The participants were no strangers to public benefactions. Usually, their names were inscribed on brass plaques, or on the exteriors of buildings which they had donated. This was not the procedure which they followed at Jekyll Island. No brass plaque was ever erected to mark the selfless actions of those who met at their private hunt club in 1910 to improve the lot of every citizen of the United States.

In fact, no benefaction took place at Jekyll Island. The Aldrich group journeyed there in private to write the banking and currency legislation which the National Monetary Commission had been ordered to prepare in public. At stake was the future control of the money and credit of the United States. If any genuine monetary reform had been prepared and presented to Congress, it would have ended the power of the elitist one world money creators. Jekyll Island ensured that a central bank would be established in the United States which would give these bankers everything they had always wanted.

As the most technically proficient of those present, Paul Warburg was charged with doing most of the drafting of the plan. His work would then be discussed and gone over by the rest of the group. Senator Nelson Aldrich was there to see that the completed plan would come out in a form which he could get passed by Congress, and the other bankers were there to include whatever details would be needed to be certain that they got everything they wanted, in a finished draft composed during a onetime stay. After they returned to New York, there could be no second get together to rework their plan. They could not hope to obtain such secrecy for their work on a second journey.

The Jekyll Island group remained at the club for nine days, working furiously to complete their task. Despite the common interests of those present, the work did not proceed without friction. Senator Aldrich, always a domineering person, considered himself the chosen leader of the group and could not help ordering everyone else about. Aldrich also felt somewhat out of place as the only member who was not a professional banker. He had had substantial banking interests throughout his career, but only as a person who profited from his ownership of bank stock. He knew little about the technical aspects of financial operations. His opposite number, Paul Warburg believed that every question raised by the group demanded, not merely an answer, but a lecture. He rarely lost an opportunity to give the members a long discourse designed to impress them with the extent of his knowledge of banking. This was resented by the others, and often drew barbed remarks from Aldrich. The natural diplomacy of Henry P. Davison proved to be the catalyst which kept them at their work. Warburg's thick alien accent grated on them, and constantly reminded them that they had to accept his presence if a central bank plan was to be devised which would guarantee them their future profits. Warburg made little effort to smooth over their prejudices, and contested them on every possible occasion on technical banking questions, which he considered his private preserve.

[Sharing Lights]

The Plan for a New Central Bank

"In all conspiracies there must be great secrecy." [5]

The "monetary reform" plan prepared at Jekyll Island was to be presented to Congress as the completed work of the National Monetary Commission. It was imperative that the real authors of the bill remain hidden. So great was popular resentment against bankers since the Panic of 1907 that no Congressman would dare to vote for a bill bearing the Wall Street taint, no matter who had contributed to his campaign expenses. The Jekyll Island plan was a central bank plan, and in this country there was a long tradition of struggle against inflicting a central bank on the American people.

It had begun with Thomas Jefferson's fight against Alexander Hamilton's scheme for the First Bank of the United States, backed by James Rothschild. It had continued with President Andrew Jackson's successful war against Alexander Hamilton's scheme for the Second Bank of the United States, in which Nicholas Biddle was acting as the agent for James Rothschild of Paris.

The result of that struggle was the creation of the Independent Sub-Treasury System, which supposedly had served to keep the funds of the United States out of the hands of the financiers. A study of the panics of 1873, 1893, and 1907 indicates that these panics were the result of the international bankers' operations in London. The public was demanding in 1908 that Congress enact legislation to prevent the recurrence of artificially induced money panics. Such monetary reform now seemed inevitable. It was to head off and control such reform that the National Monetary Commission had been set up with Nelson Aldrich at its head, since he was majority leader of the Senate.

The main problem, as Paul Warburg informed his colleagues, was to avoid the name "Central Bank". For that reason, he had decided upon the designation of "Federal Reserve System". This would deceive the people into thinking it was not a central bank. However, the Jekyll Island plan would be a central bank plan, fulfilling the main functions of a central bank; it would be owned by private individuals who would profit from ownership of shares. As a bank of issue, it would control the nation's money and credit.

In the chapter on Jekyll Island in his biography of Aldrich, Stephenson writes of the conference:

"How was the Reserve Bank to be controlled? It must be controlled by Congress. The government was to be represented in the board of directors, it was to have full knowledge of all the Bank's, affairs, but a majority of the directors were to be chosen, directly or indirectly, by the banks of the association." [6]

Thus the proposed Federal Reserve Bank was to be "controlled by Congress" and answerable to the government, but the majority of the directors were to be chosen, "directly or indirectly" by the banks of the association. In the final refinement of Warburg's plan, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors would be appointed by the President of the United States, but the real work of the Board would be controlled by a Federal Advisory Council, meeting with the Governors. The Council would be chosen by the directors of the twelve Federal Reserve Banks, and would remain unknown to the public.

The next consideration was to conceal the fact that the proposed "Federal Reserve System" would be dominated by the masters of the New York money market. The Congressmen from the South and the West could not survive if they voted for a Wall Street plan. Farmers and small businessmen in those areas had suffered most from the money panics. There had been great popular resentment against the Eastern bankers, which during the nineteenth century became a political movement known as "populism". The private papers of Nicholas Biddle, not released until more than a century after his death, show that quite early on the Eastern bankers were fully aware of the widespread public opposition to them.

Paul Warburg advanced at Jekyll Island the primary deception which would prevent the citizens from recognizing that his plan set up a central bank. This was the regional reserve system. He proposed a system of four (later twelve) branch reserve banks located in different sections of the country. Few people outside the banking world would realize that the existing concentration of the nation's money and credit structure in New York made the proposal of a regional reserve system a delusion.

Another proposal advanced by Paul Warburg at Jekyll Island was the manner of selection of administrators for the proposed regional reserve system. Senator Nelson Aldrich had insisted that the officials should be appointive, not elected, and that Congress should have no role in their selection. His Capitol Hill experience had taught him that congressional opinion would often be inimical to the Wall Street interests, as Congressmen from the West and South might wish to demonstrate to their constituents that they were protecting them against the Eastern bankers.

Warburg responded that the administrators of the proposed central banks should be subject to executive approval by the President. This patent removal of the system from Congressional control meant that the Federal Reserve proposal was unconstitutional from its inception, because the Federal Reserve System was to be a bank of issue. Article 1, Sec. 8, Par. 5 of the Constitution expressly charges Congress with "the power to coin money and regulate the value thereof.". Warburg's plan would deprive Congress of its sovereignty, and the systems of checks and balances of power set up by Thomas Jefferson in the Constitution would now be destroyed. Administrators of the proposed system would control the nation's money and credit, and would themselves be approved by the executive department of the government. The judicial department (the Supreme Court, etc.) was already virtually controlled by the executive department through presidential appointment to the bench.