Credit River Money Decision

[Sharing Lights]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

That would allow us to write Letters of Credit...

Why unlimited?

It sounds like you mean the Statutes at Large. Public Law 73-10.

Yes. I understand some essential issues
related to debt are there.

I may get to the repository tomorrow for a look.

Only when have a chance, as you have more important things to do obviously.

Regards,

David Merrill.

Thank you so much as usually.

PS. Did you save, by any chance, the contents of the links of:
http://fights4rights.com

as there are not there anymore.

[David Merrill]

Interesting! That fellow is an attorney.

Maybe he did not like the stir he was creating... or morelike that I have been creating for years now.

I will look into it.


Go back to Page 1 and scroll down. I uploaded all the linked documents attached to the opening post of this thread. They are still there.

I will inquire with James about that peculiar sports equipment page taking over his site.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Sharing Lights]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Interesting! That fellow is an attorney.

Maybe he did not like the stir he was creating... or morelike that I have been creating for years now.

I will look into it.


Go back to Page 1 and scroll down. I uploaded all the linked documents attached to the opening post of this thread. They are still there.

I will inquire with James about that peculiar sports equipment page taking over his site.



Regards,

David Merrill.

Thank you again.

I believe that, since the fellow is an attorney, and probably got some waves going on after shared the data,
he quickly backed up before a possible retaliation.


That's why I advocate passionately that capable
citizens must move upfront and design a system,
where they can learn law without being subjected
to the Dominion of the State's Bar.

We should set up some classes here led by those who
can and, then, have a second row of assistants, from common people, who are dedicated.


There are some lions here, already, who would take on most attorneys already.

Give them some boost and there is no limit,
as they are talented and have decency.

The next step is to organize and guide, before, they would continue on their own.





I think real judges and lawyers who are ruled by
Principles could provide some guidance so that we all can
save the time and unnecessary errors.


Once we accomplish that, we can shield the decent
attorneys and Judges so that their license is not
jeopardized and form an alliance of the Universal Law
based on Principles. (ULP)

Then, together, we can achieve tremendous changes
peacefully and yet effectively.


If people would continue being ignorant,
then tyranny would follow, as such as the Higher Laws.


Meanwhile, I wish all to realize that no one has a right
to judge lawyer and judge who has decency but must
retreat fro some time in order to preserve
his or her license.

A temporary retreat
may be wiser than a untimely direct clash and
all opportunities lost.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Sharing Lights

I searched and searched but cannot, yet,
find the "originals."

Does anyone have an unaltered copy?

I think what is often referred to as "Public Law 73-10," may actually be House Joint Resolution 192, 73rd Congress Public Resolution No. 10, June 5, 1933.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/downlo...do=file&id=128

It is published in The Statutes at Large of the United States of America from March 1933 to June 1934, "edited, printed, and published by authorization of Congress under the direction of The Secretary of State," Volume XLVII
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/downlo...do=file&id=127

(That Congress is herein stated to be "under the direction of the Secretary of State" seems rather interesting.)

HJR 192 amends The Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, which in fact, is Public Law 73-10.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricul...Administration

See also Guarantee Trust Co. of New York v. Henwood, US 307, 247, Footnote (3)
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bi...07&invol=2 47

It is claimed that rulings, decisions, opinions of the United States Supreme Court fix the ruling, decison, opinion, in Law which is of the Supreme Law of the Land until it is overturned by Power of legislative Act in Congress assembled, or reversed by the Court.

Footnote (3) referrenced above is HJR 192, printed in its entirety, and referrenced and published verbatim in this ruling, decision, opinion, thus fixing it in Law as per the claim.

HJR 192 appears to be somewhat of a lynchpin in a coup d' etat flurry of treasonous activity in 1933 and affords the American population remedy of legal tender to discharge debt in absence of lawful money of substance to exchange for substance of equal intrinsic value, and to afford discharge for charge of treason (which is to war upon "this Constitution of the United States of America, which is in and of itself government) by the sworn bondservants of government ordained and established from without government by "We The People" in common law, and "vested" with "legislative Powers," "executive Power," and "judicial Power," as government which is "this Constitution of the United States of America."

The Agricultural Adjustment Act, Public Law 73-10 is quoted in HJR 192 to be entitled: "An act to relieve the existing national economic emergency by increasing agricultural puschasing power, to raise revenue for extraordinary expenses incurred by reason of such emergency, to provide emergency relief with respect to agricultural indebtedness, to provide for the orderly liquidation of joint-stock land banks, and for other purposes," approved May 12, 1933.

I think HJR 192, and Public Law 73-10 are likely referrenced conjointly when used as remedy because of portions of the Public Law dealing with coinage, and because of the significance of the portion of HJR provided as amendment to the Public Law, "and for other purposes,"

I cannot find the full text of Public Law 73-10, but perhaps this helps.

[Sharing Lights]

Originally Posted by mrg

I think what is often referred to as "Public Law 73-10," may actually be House Joint Resolution 192, 73rd Congress Public Resolution No. 10, June 5, 1933.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/downlo...do=file&id=128

It is published in The Statutes at Large of the United States of America from March 1933 to June 1934, "edited, printed, and published by authorization of Congress under the direction of The Secretary of State," Volume XLVII
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/downlo...do=file&id=127

(That Congress is herein stated to be "under the direction of the Secretary of State" seems rather interesting.)

HJR 192 amends The Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, which in fact, is Public Law 73-10.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricul...Administration

See also Guarantee Trust Co. of New York v. Henwood, US 307, 247, Footnote (3)
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bi...07&invol=2 47

It is claimed that rulings, decisions, opinions of the United States Supreme Court fix the ruling, decison, opinion, in Law which is of the Supreme Law of the Land until it is overturned by Power of legislative Act in Congress assembled, or reversed by the Court.

Footnote (3) referrenced above is HJR 192, printed in its entirety, and referrenced and published verbatim in this ruling, decision, opinion, thus fixing it in Law as per the claim.

HJR 192 appears to be somewhat of a lynchpin in a coup d' etat flurry of treasonous activity in 1933 and affords the American population remedy of legal tender to discharge debt in absence of lawful money of substance to exchange for substance of equal intrinsic value, and to afford discharge for charge of treason (which is to war upon "this Constitution of the United States of America, which is in and of itself government) by the sworn bondservants of government ordained and established from without government by "We The People" in common law, and "vested" with "legislative Powers," "executive Power," and "judicial Power," as government which is "this Constitution of the United States of America.

The Agricultural Adjustment Act, Public Law 73-10 is quoted in HJR 192 to be entitled: "An act to relieve the existing national economic emergency by increasing agricultural puschasing power, to raise revenue for extraordinary expenses incurred by reason of such emergency, to provide emergency relief with respect to agricultural indebtedness, to provide for the orderly liquidation of joint-stock land banks, and for other purposes," approved May 12, 1933.

I think HJR 192, and Public Law 73-10 are likely referrenced conjointly when used as remedy because of portions of the Public Law dealing with coinage, and because of the significance of the portion of HJR provided as amendment to the Public Law, "and for other purposes,"

I cannot find the full text of Public Law 73-10, but perhaps this helps.

What a superb job, dear, Mrg!

You saved me and others much valuable time.
I thank you for spending your, own valuable time to
assist others.

I really needed those links.
Thank you and a lot!

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Sharing Lights

Thank you again.

I believe that, since the fellow is an attorney, and probably got some waves going on after shared the data,
he quickly backed up before a possible retaliation.


That's why I advocate passionately that capable
citizens must move upfront and design a system,
where they can learn law without being subjected
to the Dominion of the State's Bar.

We should set up some classes here led by those who
can and, then, have a second row of assistants, from common people, who are dedicated.

When suijuris.net went down for a few days I got the distinct impression we are already doing that. I should have gone to the drugstore to see what my blood pressure was up to. 20/20 hindsight science! I bet others were a little stressed out too.



Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S. I will get images of P.L. 73-10 and Sanhedrin 57A from the federal repository today.

P.P.S. Pacinlaw; that website comes to mind. Weishaupt seems to be grooming that site around expatriation or a variation on that. But it is small, and already ready for grooming into some sort of internet school. Like here but since it is small, if this is not what you are looking for and speaking about in your post above, maybe you could help for pacinlaw before it gets formed into something else.

PAC | Welcome to the People's Awareness Coalition |
People's Awareness Coalition is an Organization that centers in Constitutional Law.
http://www.pacinlaw.org

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Sharing Lights

Thank you so much as usually.

PS. Did you save, by any chance, the contents of the links of:
http://fights4rights.com

as there are not there anymore.

It is a mystery to Jim too. It may be after the weekend for any answers:

David,


Thanks for the heads up.


I have having my web guy look into it.


Jim




On Sep 15, 2006, at 9:15 PM, David Merrill wrote:


Dear James;


Your website seems to have been taken over by a sports page?



Regards,

David Merrill.

[cz3000]

http://www.archive.org/index.php


wayback machine.
doesn't always 'work' tho'.

Originally Posted by David Merrill

It is a mystery to Jim too. It may be after the weekend for any answers:

[Sharing Lights]

Originally Posted by cz3000

http://www.archive.org/index.php


wayback machine.
doesn't always 'work' tho'.

Such a great link. Thank you so much.
I hope all can realize the true value of sharing
knowledge and assisting each other.

One can accomplish a lot.
Yet, when many share what can,
that force is multiplied in geometric progression.

It may take plenty of time to find something.

Then, one post may translate into a key given to many to find something valuable almost instantly.

That is the power of sharing
and I thank all of you who
do that so selfishly and sincerely.


From the onset, I have predicted that this Website/Forum
would become a center of enlightenment in the Cyberspace.

Give it some time and you will see how accurate I have been.

Yet, as in a Paradox, that rests on the idea that more and more would share and participate actively,
as if the freedom depends on that.

This is the concept of snowball in action.
Once it rolls, from a tiny conglomeration,
it may become huge and cause an avalanche.

In our case, an avalanche of enlightenment.

Then, many others would be drawn here
from all over the Internet,
as so many people, already, search for answers
and the keys to Sovereignty.

Thank you all of you and never worry about
the results - just do what's right
and fruits shall follow!

Amen!

[Shoonra]

So-called HJR 192 was, when enacted, designated Public Resolution 10. This was a practice, long ago discontinued, of distinguishing enacted bills from joint resolutions; nowadays both are numbered in one sequence as Public Laws.

HJR 192 did not affect debts except to this extent - gold ceased to be a medium of exchange inside the US. Gold certificates, contracts calling for payment of a certain dollar amount in gold, and the like, could no longer, under this law, be enforced for gold. All such obligations were made payable in other forms of legal tender, including paper money, dollar for dollar.

This was upheld by the US Supreme Court. However, in another case, the Supreme Court stated that a contract calling for payment in a specific weight of gold, rather than dollar amount, was enforceable for payment in gold.

In the 1970s the restriction on gold was repealed, so that (the relatively small number of) contracts and investments still operating from before 1933 calling for payment in gold, which had for 40 years been paid in FRNs or other forms of currency, could resume payments in gold, and new contracts callying for payment in gold could be written and enforced. However, payments due in the intervening 40 years could not be retroactively collected in gold.