"Traverse" into admiralty (since the contemplation of seizure is already there anyway [gold fringes]). The property was considered somehow derelect (floatsam or jettison). Sue in a Libel of Review clearly specifying
geophysical coordinates and boundary description (legal description).
[Put the Terrafly crosshair on your roof and read the coordinates on the control panel.
http://www.terrafly.com ]
The timeframe is thirty days but considering you were never notified anyway, the Verified Statement of Right is without timeframe stipulations.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/RuleC.htm
Specifically Rule C(4) Notice
Quote:
|
The notice must specify the time under Rule C(6) to file a statement of interest in or right against the seized property and to answer.
|
Above it is suggested that you may sue for the faulty notice and other flaws in the statutory foreclosure process. The paranoid voices in my head tell me that an investigator detected you were planning on some kind of debt elimination scheme based in the fact you are the creditor from the get-go. So they just jumped you. I think suing on the faults in process will just be bluffing that they will not reveal the admiralty nature of the cause in order to hide the diversity of citizenship issue (
colorable v. truth; the fiction on the birth certificate was capitalized upon to generate the credit they appear to have loaned back to you - suppositional wagering scheme [but they lost when you resolved your identity crisis; capital integration]). So now they are trying to generate a sale of your property on the presumption the man has no claim to it (having abandoned the facade of a fictional mask).
Do you buy that?
Suing in a "higher" court may be effective but only because they do not want to reveal the represented truth of those gold fringes. The risk management is yours to manage. I have seen Verified Statements of Right keep people in their homes.
See the image on the initial posting...
http://forum.suijuris.net/showthread...socioprolepsis
Regards,
David Merrill.