trust provision appoint successor

[mikah2k]

Personally I do not need an answer. I want an answer, but if you answer online, I might get flack, thanks to the government attorney/trustee.

And I believe you believe in prosecuting the [imaginary] unauthorized practice of law. And I'm on your proverbial side as I believe in "paying" debts with debts.
----
theoretical rhetoric mumbo-jumbo non-[standard-]sense

[mikah2k]

Notorial dissent,
Supposing my theoretical rhetoric mumbo-jumbo non-[standard-]sense in re to who can appoint successors is provable, What would constitute proof to you? What would the proof look like?

[Notorial dissent]

Something in black and white and verifiable, with the necessary background.

[mikah2k]

Your description of proof is vague: please narrow your description.

[Notorial dissent]

I simply want to see what you are talking about.

[mikah2k]

Originally Posted by Notorial dissent

I simply want to see what you are talking about.

You and Me both want to see the same thing. I wonder if anyone else wants to see the same thing.

Let me know when you have a description.