Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mrg
Is it one of those see-through things?
(The dress, not the joke, or maybe either/both??)
|
She presumes we all can understand the reason for a new thread. She wants to pick a fight with me on the one hand, but on the other she does not want to be alienated from the Suijuris community like Lawdog and Shoonra.
The main cusp in Western history is found in my Signature line, quoted from Shoonra. Two points stand out though:
1) the Pope nullified the Magna Charta
2) the people were hoarding their own gold in 1933
Both are true. Both are false. And around here which one stands defines who you are. So Madeline's dress is see-through alright.
1) is true but Shoonra tried qualifying the Treaty of 1213 as a personal religious belief of King John. Therefore the Pope nullifying the Magna Charta was more a personal excommunication than anything national. However the
Concession of England to the Pope - as the Treaty of 1213 is called, was obviously national and Shoonra cannot have the nullification of the Magna Charta on the Treaty of 1213 as any personal matter. England wrote up other Great Charters later also called the Magna Charta and poo-poos the Original on that...
It goes on and on.
2) true again; the people were concerned that the twenty year charter for the FR banks was coming due. If you had FRNs you wanted to go get your gold. That meant that the banks would have to admit to thievery - they no longer had enough gold for the Run. So FDR made thievery legal and Shoonra says the people were so poor that it did not matter government stole all they had left - the ones rich enough to have any gold were
hoarding!
http://Friends-n-Family-Research.inf...March_1933.jpg
Based on her 9/9/07 join date, I do not believe Madeline is Cody based on his never-overlapping identities. Madeline may be Cody, I just am not going to assume so. If she sounded like Cody to me, I would think so.
I see through her transparent dress a woman who cried "Yikes!" because I answered with the ORDER instead of the FINAL ORDER that included
without prejudice. I took it as condescending and snipped back. Now she is aligning herself with Lawdog's attack on Credit River Township's right to form assize, chopping off her nose to spite her face around here. She tried PMs to keep her attorney-stance from being obvious and she started an ambiguous new thread without explaining why, again, to keep her attorney posture from being obvious.
But like Madeline's see-through dress, it has two sides to the story. According to the attorneys at the State of Minnesota corporation's Supreme Court - the State Bar Association under the International Bar Association out of the Sovereign and Independent City of London - the Temple of the Crown Templars, the General Assembly had the right to say that the Judgment was a legal nullity by passing an unconstitutional law a few years before.
I will agree with one thing in her opening post here though. It is really up to the readers to decide. I told a couple returning from vacation who had viewed one of the original Magna Chartas of 1215 that in some circles the Pope nullified it. The wife said, "The Pope is not in authority to do that."
Some people think that saying people who want to redeem their own gold, and hold the weight of the metal in their hands and pockets are not actually hoarding.
And then again, Jerome Daly lived in the home in Credit River for several decades after Credit River. If the Supreme Court really overturned the Decision, then the bank would have told him to leave, don't you think?
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. On the banks of the Thames there at the Temple is a shrine to the Magna Charta - and interestingly it would seem more of a funeral than recognition...
The Whole Credit River Decision
