SUPERIOR COURT SUMMONS! I panicked!

[Jerry Pitts]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

ALL a notary can do is VERIFY THAT A PERSON WHO SIGNED A DOCUMENT WAS WHO THEY SAID THEY ARE. That means if the notary does not already know you personally, they should ask to see a driver's license, passport, or some other government issued ID with a picture on it. I'm a notary as well as an attorney, and that's how I do it.

A notarized document is simply prima facie evidence that the signer whose name appears on the document really was the person named.

Quick question for you here puppydog. What is an "Act of State"?

Also, what is an "Apostille"?

Jerry Carlos

[IAM]

Marie,

I have something for you. If you will send me your email address via PM (personal message) I will email it to you (and/or anyone else that wants it).

You have the right idea about the notary but the Notary would have to agree to be a Notary Acceptor of the correspondence you would receive from the bank. After 30 or 60 or 90 days the Notary would send you a Certificate of Non Response (in affidavit form) verifying that he/she never received a response from the bank. A notary will normally charge you a fee for this service.

[Lawdog]

Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts

Quick question for you here puppydog. What is an "Act of State"?

Also, what is an "Apostille"?

Jerry Carlos

Address me properly and maybe I will answer you.

"Puppydog" isn't going to cut it.

[ezrhythm]

A fool shows his annoyance at once, but a prudent man overlooks an insult.

[Jerry Pitts]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

Address me properly and maybe I will answer you.

"Puppydog" isn't going to cut it.

'Idiot', 'Crank', 'Fool', and the sundry of other labels you direct at other men and women on this forum, also does not 'cut it'. However some of them continue to respond to your abrasive comments. Such is life.

Address you properly???? Properly would suggest that I use only your true name. Expose that true name to entire community of this forum and I and others would be more than happy to address you "properly".

Have a nice day.

Jerry Carlos

[Lawdog]

Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts

'Idiot', 'Crank', 'Fool', and the sundry of other labels you direct at other men and women on this forum, also does not 'cut it'. However some of them continue to respond to your abrasive comments. Such is life.

Address you properly???? Properly would suggest that I use only your true name. Expose that true name to entire community of this forum and I and others would be more than happy to address you "properly".

Have a nice day.

Jerry Carlos

It's true, my comments are sometimes abrasive, but consider things from my point of view.

Imagine that this were instead a board about medical topics, and I was one of the few medical doctors posting on the board. Assume further that my handle was DoctorDog or something like that. How would you imagine I would feel if a bunch of people who never even went to medical school scoffed at my advice and called me things like "docpuppy"?

Now change the following words and phrases in the above paragraph as follows: "medical topics" to "legal topics"; "medical doctors" to "lawyers"; "DoctorDog" to "Lawdog"; "medical school" to "law school."

At this point, I think the analogy should be pretty clear.

As far as my real name goes, Shoonra knows who I am. I'm sure that he is resourceful enough to check whether my credentials match my claims, if he so desires.

You can call me Scott if you wish.

And by the way, an "act of state" can be either a simple noun or a legal doctrine, depending on the context. And I know damn well what an apostille is, I had to help some clients get one a few weeks ago because they're trying to adopt an infant in Russia and bring him to this country.

[Jerry Pitts]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

It's true, my comments are sometimes abrasive, but consider things from my point of view.

Imagine that this were instead a board about medical topics, and I was one of the few medical doctors posting on the board. Assume further that my handle was DoctorDog or something like that. How would you imagine I would feel if a bunch of people who never even went to medical school scoffed at my advice and called me things like "docpuppy"?

Now change the following words and phrases in the above paragraph as follows: "medical topics" to "legal topics"; "medical doctors" to "lawyers"; "DoctorDog" to "Lawdog"; "medical school" to "law school."

At this point, I think the analogy should be pretty clear.

As far as my real name goes, Shoonra knows who I am. I'm sure that he is resourceful enough to check whether my credentials match my claims, if he so desires.

You can call me Scott if you wish.

And by the way, an "act of state" can be either a simple noun or a legal doctrine, depending on the context. And I know damn well what an apostille is, I had to help some clients get one a few weeks ago because they're trying to adopt an infant in Russia and bring him to this country.

Usually speaking Scott (?), from my past readings of the various threads, it is usually you that initiates the abrasive comments to unsuspecting men and women, when they are simply seeking information to assist them in their problems. So when that man or woman (or even third party intervenor) decides to respond with their own variations of abrasive language, would that not be considered as equitable behavior? You know; sort of like a bystander coming to the aid of a damsel in distress when the bystander sees the damsel being assaulted by some man that is unknown to the damsel.

My whole point is the fact that there are some on this forum that choose to use their 'proper' label as it relates to a name. Thus far, you still have not done so. You allude to the possibility of yet another 'fictitious creature' you refer to as Shoonra having cognizance of your 'proper' calling, yet you refuse to display it for others to see. You pride yourself on the alleged fact that you are a graduate of some law school ('alleged' as there is no way for another to verify this claim without the 'proper' calling being available), yet you hide behind some stage name. In my particular case, both my True calling, and the state recognized 'legal name' are all over the internet (easy to check out and verify), and I don't have a degree from any 'law school', why are you so reluctant to reveal 'who' you really are? Why are you hiding?

The boasting and bragging of your academic achievements is well and fine, and even commendable; but when contrasted to the fact that you are acting in a manner that displays a condition, or promotes the cognition of others, that you are ashamed of 'who' you are, is an entirely different story. How is it possible for you to gain the respect and dignity that a graduate of law school would desire, when you hide the REAL you from those that are observing your actions on this forum?

Jerry Carlos

Edited information: BTW, the scenario of the medical forum is poor judgment on your part. This past Tuesday night, my wife died of Cancer. During her bout with the ailment, I personally questioned a number of Oncologists that were attending her, and they all were forced, through honesty and guilt, that they did not know where Cancer comes from, nor do they understand 'how' it gets started. So should I call these professionals who went through med school incompetent? They openly admit that they are incompetent, when they admit that they "do not know".

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

It's true, my comments are sometimes abrasive, but consider things from my point of view.

Imagine that this were instead a board about medical topics, and I was one of the few medical doctors posting on the board. Assume further that my handle was DoctorDog or something like that. How would you imagine I would feel if a bunch of people who never even went to medical school scoffed at my advice and called me things like "docpuppy"?

Now change the following words and phrases in the above paragraph as follows: "medical topics" to "legal topics"; "medical doctors" to "lawyers"; "DoctorDog" to "Lawdog"; "medical school" to "law school."

At this point, I think the analogy should be pretty clear.

Translation: "I can't prove up. I won't prove up. You can't make me prove up!!" "Waah, Waaah!!!"


SUSSMAN holding the howling LAWDOG, while KAPUST stirs the pot.


This is not a board about medical topics, and you, admittedly now, by default, after default, are decidedly not the equivalent of "one of the few medical doctors posting on the board."

You cannot show anything credible.

Originally Posted by Lawdog
I've been doing real estate law as part of my practice for over seven years.

You expect people just to take your word for it?

Originally Posted by Lawdog
Unlike some people here, I don't expect people to just take me at my word.

Originally Posted by mrg

Hey lawdog!

Where's your proof that you are what you claim to be?

How about some names and contact information of satisfied customers?

Where's those copies of published "court wins?"

Isn't that what you expect from others?

But you're "different?"

C'mon, son.

Prove up, my boy.

Hey lawdog, can you hear me?

Originally posted by mrg

Pathology of Trolls


Some anonymous poster of opinionated legalistic gibberish and BAR Association propaganda on an internet forum claims to be an "attorney,"

provided

he "believes" (is of the opinion that) everyone is

Originally posted by mrg

More so are you, apparently.

You demand credentials, but will produce none yourself?

I see nothing but a pathetic, pitiable, cheap impostor acting out his silly fantasy of being an actual "lawyer."

Where on this site is valid proof positive verifying any actual "legal" experience of your own, Perry Mason?

David is quite honest about who he is where he is, what he does, and I am certain one would be able to locate him and personally test the efficacy of his procedures with an issue that involves little risk.

This distinction is, thus-far quite foreign in to your own habitual practice of, at best, the empty hollow pettifoggery, of an effete and fraudulent dilettante, in fact, my boy.

You made claims, son.

I called you on them, little man.

Twice now, hoss.

Why not just prove up or shut up, BOY?

Or you can just continue to:


and...

Originally posted by mrg

Will you please post the names and contact information of YOUR pleased "suitors" or "clients," or whatever you call them, "so that this can be verified?"

How about some statistics on those who are/were/have been "unpleased," along with names and contact information,"so that this can be verified?"

In fact, since you seem to appear here claiming to be a "lawyer" how about YOUR name and contact information, "so that this can be verified?"

Like your name and BAR card number, and a scan of your "license to practice law," "so that this can be verified?"

How else can one verify that you are who and what you say you are?

Will you post unredacted proof positive of your "successes" in court using your "legal" "theories," "so that this can be verified?"

Will you post unredacted proof positive of any of your "successes" in court at all "so that this can be verified?"

In fact, I say that your claim to being a "lawyer" is just that--an empty, unvalidated, unverified claim.

Prove your claim.

Talk is cheap.

Prove up.

"...so that this can be verified."


Not A "Lawyer" Just Another Dog in the Pack


Odd how that works.

Don't you think, my boy?

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Jerry Pitts

Edited information: BTW, the scenario of the medical forum is poor judgment on your part.

This past Tuesday night, my wife died of Cancer.

During her bout with the ailment, I personally questioned a number of Oncologists that were attending her, and they all were forced, through honesty and guilt, that they did not know where Cancer comes from, nor do they understand 'how' it gets started.

So should I call these professionals who went through med school incompetent?

They openly admit that they are incompetent, when they admit that they "do not know".

My condolences for your loss Jerry.

I hope the following is not offensive to you, or painful for you.

Originally Posted by mrg

Hey Lawdog...

Funny how you compare "attorning" to "doctoring."

Your "doctors" want to butcher rather than prevent or heal.

Hey man what's the difference between "law enforcement" and "crime prevention" and which one best suits your "professional" "practice's" profit margin?

Which one is better for society?

But "crime prevention" has never "worked" has it?

How long has your "profession" been "practicing?"

About as long as "crime prevention" hasn't been "working" maybe?

No corrollary there is there?

Of course not.

Sort of like the poison, burn, and butcher school of "medicine" ya think, kiddo?

Prevention and healing don't put the ribs on the table like some nice bonecutting, right, son?

Hey man, I will hang with this little community of legal scholars, and leave the poison, burn, and butcher schools of "medicine," "banking," and "law enforcement" to you JD's, MD's, "Esquires," "Honorables," and your corps of corporate municipal mercenary troops.


Hack away, bro.

We here have some crime prevention to look after.

No thanks to you.

PMO CMA Big Time, Bro!

Hey lawdog why are you here making accusations and demands, all the while doing UPL; misrepresenting yourself as an "attorney," and presuming people are just supposed to take your "word" for it?

You seem to be confused, bewildered, and bitterly upset that some people aren't taken with your expectations of con-fi-dence in the "take my word for it" school of "FACTS?"

Originally Posted by Lawdog
Unlike some people here, I don't expect people to just take me at my word.

[onesentient]

I offer my condolence to you Jerry