Wrong Name on CC

[masterduke]

The Crook in the robe just don't care! He is out to slam as many as he can. Any afirmative admission in the debt attorneys "answer" sheet that you make immediatly sets the stage for a summary judgement ruling. And thats what this is all moving towards during the whole process.

[Jerseee]

Well just make sure that EVERYTHING is on the record.

[cz3000]

see my posts

Originally Posted by doormonkey

The suggestion to actually go and watch the process is an excellent one.

Dr. Graves says we always have the right to insist on an original copy of the contract. He seems to adamantly encourage us not to accept copies. Under "Request for Production" he says and I quote " Request to see originals, if there are any. If you accept copies (a common practice) you run the risk of doctored papers. Don't do it....You have the right to see originals...."

This seems to back the widely held view here, that only the original, wet ink document can truly validate a debt.

[u2scsi]

If I'm not mistaken, reading up on federal rules for evidence really wouldn't help you much. This will likely take place in a county courtroom, so they would follow state guidelines for both evidence and procedures. FDCPA violations were also ignored in my case.