I know in reality, especially when trying to acquire the new job, that does not wash.
The primary objective seems to be avoiding
endorsement. That seems to be the
poison - endorsement of the fiat currency. First I broadcast the rumor to suitors, and they made rubber stamps:
Quote:
|
DEPOSITED FOR CREDIT ON ACCOUNT OR EXCHANGED FOR NON-NEGOTIABLE FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES OF FACE VALUE.
|
Then Lewis Vincent HUGHES on ecclesia.org resorted to a rare book on commercial instruments and says, "I have a draft against your bank I am presenting for acceptance." Then endorses:
Quote:
No liability assumed;
No value assured;
|
It really seems to be the acceptance of colorable money without protest that draws one into a colorable world. Lewis has some law school attorneys in conference agreeing this is so. It agrees with Erie docrine and Jacques Sanchara JAIKARAN -
Debt Virus (1994).
Some of us know the advantages of having no bank account. Many of us have bank accounts we cannot imagine doing without.
So consider the signature card. That is the authorizing signature. I have not heard of putting this broadswipe
disclaimer of avoidance (either one) on the signature card. The bank of course has the opportunity to tell you go take a hike. I just have not heard how it goes. But that is the opportunity to cover endorsement, or lack thereof on the general tariff. Then all the subsequent direct deposits are non-taxable.
Many people do not understand they sign a 40-100 page agreement (tariff) when they sign a signature card. It behooves folks to ask for this tariff and strike through the terms about turning over funds to third parties (Notice of Levy from the IMFIRS) without judicial order or judgment and having the new agreement served on the Bank. But I wander off point.
Regards,
David Merrill.