
06-12-2004, 12:54 AM
|
|
|
|
HJR 192 Clarity
I want to make sure I am clear on the meaning of this:
"'Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy; and no such provision shall be contained in or made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred. Every obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, whether or not any such provision is contained therein or made with respect thereto, shall be discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts. Any such provision contained in any law authorizing obligations to be issued by or under authority of the United States, is hereby repealed, but the repeal of any such provision shall not invalidate any other provision or authority contained in such law."[/b]
This just doesn't look like it places liability on the US government.
Can you help me understand this?
Thanks
HB
|

06-12-2004, 01:10 AM
|
|
Practice Makes Perfect
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 373
|
|
|
HJR 192 Clarity
I'm having the same problem. It says coin or currency it does not say anything about negotiable instruments.
It says Discharge upon Payment of debt. So to discharge a debt it has to be Paid and by paying you admit that you owed a debt.
Feel like I'm going in circles with this one. I must be missing something.
__________________
sadie
not legal advice - just my 2 cents (not lawful money)
|

06-12-2004, 01:23 AM
|
 |
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 199
|
|
|
HJR 192 Clarity
what is the def of "legal tender"? I believe that would be a starting point in finding the answer to your question, sadie. also.... the VoD w/ CPN, to my unerstanding is a "just in case" they validaye the deb (whuch they probably can't do).
t, they have payment in full, right there
interesting... I was reading my parents mortgage and it says that it can only be payed with Funds from an account. I dont have access to Black's, but Bouviers says funds is "cash" so no CPN? are they violating HJR192 by limiting payment to "Funds" from an account?
sorry for typos... typing onehanded
__________________
"The true believer (anyone who is redeemed by the blood of the Lamb) does not do in order to become. He does because he is what God has made him - the righteousness of God in Messiah." "I will show you my faith by my works." (James 2:18)
|

06-12-2004, 04:18 AM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,837
|
|
|
HJR 192 Clarity
folks,
You're making this way too complicated. It appears that you may be stuck on the premise that FRNs satisfies debts or can "pay" debts. I understand its hard to break years of teaching and lies.
The CPN is used to discharge the debt. It is a commercial instrument used in commercial tranactions. Just like the dollar, the money order, the check, the bond, the food stamp, etc.. etc..
The major thing about the CPN is that you create it and it is unique. Now the elements of the CPN is what makes it negotiable. Citing HJR 192 and certain case law in your CPN is what backs your note. Having a witness sign it--makes it certified. That is why I have a notary sign mine.
Please get a business law book from your library and read up on negotiable instruments.
__________________
"FOR AS HE THINKETH IN HIS HEART, SO IS HE."
|

06-12-2004, 10:36 AM
|
 |
Unplugged
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 199
|
|
|
HJR 192 Clarity
Not the exact law but a summary of it:
hereI. WHAT ARE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS?
Art. 3 (Commc'l paper) & Art. 4 (Bank Deposits & Collections)
A. Types of Instruments
1. Notes: promise to pay
PROM. NOTE: written promise by maker to pay money to payee
2. Drafts: order issued by Drawer to pay money to Payee
CHECK: Drawer orders drawee bank to pay out to payee
SALES DRAFT: Buyer signs draft for goods & seller is payee
3. Either must have order or promise to pay (IOU only acknowledges;
not "I authorize")
II. NEGOTIABILITY (if not negotiable K law applies)
A. Elements of Negotiability: signed writing, w/ uncondtn'l promise or
order to pay sum certain on demand or at particular future date
1. Signature: anything intending to authenticate
2. Uncondtn'l Prom./Order to Pay
a. No express conditions b/4 will pay allowed
b. Can refer to other documents; not make subject to
c. Can't limit to a particular fund (except trusts, estate, govt
entities, partnerships, uninc. ass'ns)
d. Maker/Drawer can't clutter up w/ other promises, orders, like
having prom. note + sec. agreemt 1 paper (except: cognotive note to
confer J OK in bus. trans.)
3. Time of Payment
a. Demand Instrument payable on demand (check)
b. Time Instrument on particular date (prom. note)
(1) acceleration clauses OK
(2) extension clauses NOT OK, unless holder's right
(3) can't be s/to indefinite event; MAKES IT NON-NEGOTIABLE even
if event has already occurred
4. To Pay a Sum Certain
a. Must be able figure from face how much it's worth
b. Must have specified interest rate or NOT a negot. instrument (if
"with interest" assumed J rate) (5/3 prime no good)
c. Must be prom. to pay in MONEY (legal tender any ctry)
__________________
"The true believer (anyone who is redeemed by the blood of the Lamb) does not do in order to become. He does because he is what God has made him - the righteousness of God in Messiah." "I will show you my faith by my works." (James 2:18)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:41 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|