Banks, Collectors, and CRAs Discuss the elimationa of secured and unsecured "debt", as well as tactics for dealing with debt collectors and credit reporting agencies.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Banks, Collectors, and CRAs
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 05-30-2006, 12:33 PM
Shoonra Shoonra is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,745
Obviously somebody is missing the concept, but I still wonder what is the result of stamping "Accepted for Value" on court papers.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-30-2006, 06:19 PM
ezrhythm ezrhythm is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,212
Send a message via AIM to ezrhythm Send a message via Yahoo to ezrhythm
I haven't seen if anyone has ever said to use that term on court papers. Even the thread doesn't mention using it for that.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-30-2006, 07:36 PM
Shoonra Shoonra is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,745
Alright. What is the result of stamping it on other official or non-financial documents??
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-30-2006, 07:57 PM
palani's Avatar
palani palani is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,039
Offer and acceptance are elements of contract law. The one who accepts an offer is the holder in due course, otherwise known as the only one who has any rights in an agreement as this is the one who gets to hold the original of the contract.

Heres one you can try. Buy your next car from a dealer who has advertised in the paper. Tell the salesman you would like to accept their offer at the price they are advertising. Five will get you ten they write it up so that you will have submitted the offer and they are in the position of accepting.

As to court documents, if there is no controversy there is nothing left for the court to adjudicate. Agree to everything, just make sure you are the acceptor rather than the offerer.

But I am not a legal type so above can not be considered legal advice.
__________________
Its' a dog eat dog world and I am wearing milkbone underwear!!!

Last edited by palani : 05-30-2006 at 08:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-30-2006, 09:21 PM
aksis's Avatar
aksis aksis is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Universal Kingdom of God; Earth
Posts: 1,112
From the impression someone left me with when he share his perspective on this in a seminar,

"Accepted for Value" is, you, acting as agent for the PERSON, accept the presentment/bill/fine/fee to the PERSON from the US, State[s], Municipal Corporation[s], Federal Reserve and branches, agents thereof et al., etc..

And, because of HJR-192 (you know, when all the gold was seized & in return the people were given 'unlimited credit') the debt is able to be discharged [not paid] via the social social security account #000-00-0000 opened for the PERSON, an Implied [constructive] Trust established via the New Deal.

It is aginst public policy to "pay" anything because it requires lawful money (gold & silver) to do so.

He who has the gold "pays" the bills. So in life in the post New Deal STATES[S], debt is discharged... unless you have Dollars, then you could "pay" it, but are not required to "pay" anything as this is aginst "public policy". You must discharge your debts to settle your accounts though. There are other ways to do this then tendering Federal Reserve Notes from what I understand and others are very aware of.

If there is an accountant amount the People reading this thread prehaps we could get a better lesson on T Accounts and double entery book keeping...

Imagin for a moment that someone, the (US) owes a PERSON 1,000,000.00, [keep in mind the "credit" is actualy unlimited] and they can't pay you yet, so they have a -1,000,000.00 debt with you, and, you have a 1,000,000.00 credit with them...

PERSON "T" ACCOUNT #000-00-0000
PERSON'S Books - US Books
+| -..................+| -
1,000,000.00|.......... ............|1,000,000.00

Now, a day comes that you end up owing them 5000.00 for something... you could discharge the debt by charging up their account, and, then they would only have a debt of -995,000.00 with you & you would only have a credit of 995,000.00 with them.

PERSON "T" ACCOUNT #000-00-000
PERSON'S Books - US Books
+| -.......................+| -
1,000,000.00|............................|1,000,000.00
|5000.00>5000.00|
995,000.00
|............................|995,000.00

By, acting as agent for the PERSON, and, Accepting for Value the charge [a fine for example], to the PERSON'S Account, the debt is discharged
& the account[s] are further settled.

I believe that is the jist of Accepted for Value.

Shoonra, I don't see how you could "Accept for Value" anything but 'charges' either...

Prehaps some people are looking to Refuse for Cause "non-financial documents such as [shoonra, do you mean 'administrative hearing's'?] court papers, subpoenae, official forms and the like"?

Further, I am not sure if debts with non-government establishments can be discharged like this... like if you owe your neighbor 'money', or the guy who worked on your roof, etc... even if I could, I don't think it would be right and I would not choose to do that.

Prehaps someone else could elaborate and/or correct any misinformation?

Its kind of a complex subject that I am still really just learning about it.
__________________
Note: It is a custom recognized by many People to use a ":" (colon) between one's name and their FAMILY name, and is used to segregate the name pertaining to the natural sovereign man, "Christopher Theodore," from the FAMILY name, "RHODES" (an implied trust), and further, both from the name of the implied constructive trust resulting from the workings of the New Deal, "CHRISTOPHER THEODORE RHODES."
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-30-2006, 11:26 PM
Jerseee's Avatar
Jerseee Jerseee is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,837
Aksis,

Very nice response. But there is one flaw in that whole process that gives folks like Shoonra, JRB and the like a little ammo to go after this versus going after proven victories in the success forum, and that is...

Can you prove it?

Can anyone prove that these "accounts" exist?
Can anyone prove that these "amounts" are valid?

There are a lot of affirmative statements made with regard to A4V that I have seen not to be proven. Further, based on these unfounded affirmatives, a whole accounting structure is devised to explain it, to lend the initial premise of secret "accounts" and "credits" with a posture of credibility.

Just as the repulsive practice of arbitration, I have yet to see anyone succeed with redemption methods such as A4V.

Just my experience and thoughts on this matter.
__________________
"FOR AS HE THINKETH IN HIS HEART, SO IS HE."
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-31-2006, 06:38 AM
georgealexander georgealexander is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 113
A4V - Dishonor

Recalling a seminar speaker - I'm NOT reading from notes NOR replaying video - with much experience using the A4V process with the Notoral Protest: 'I have never used the A4V process for any other purpose than to put the Presenter in Dishonor and having that Presenter liquidated under the bankruptcy by the Secretary of the Treasury.'

vis a vie "accounts" [General Accepted Accounting Practises - GAAP], the same seminar speaker stated, "I can not 'see' the wind, but when I see tree branches moving back and forth, I know the wind is blowing."

Additional comments discouraged participants from attempting to buy groceries and such with 'one's EXEMPTION'.

The use of a BOE, not the A4V process, 'required the level of knowledge of a corporate level Vice President of a major bank on a need to know basis to access one's EXEMPTION.' It would be easier to access several million FRNS than $5.99 for a six pack. [I am paraphasing the seminar speaker]



George Alexander
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-31-2006, 07:12 PM
Judge Roy Bean's Avatar
Judge Roy Bean Judge Roy Bean is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
Alright. What is the result of stamping it on other official or non-financial documents??
Nothing other than taking up space. It is legally meaningless.
__________________
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
Creditoris Squaliformes
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-31-2006, 07:50 PM
artificialsteve artificialsteve is offline
Unplugged
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Coast
Posts: 81
my 2 cents

I have been studying this a4v process and I am under the impression that it is used for setoff and adjustments to the PRIVATE side of accounts(look that word up!)
I cant PROVE it works but there are a lot of things you must try YOURSELF....because there are too many JUDGE ROY BEANS out there who are trying to paint a picture for you...that exemptions, remedies, recourses, uniform commercial codes and all the rest of that fun stuff....are completely useless......suuuuuure....thats why we are all failing right ROY??...give me a break...
.....The information is here...but it takes a LOT of hardwork and studying in order to grasp the potential of being sovereign....just trust your instincts and have PURE intentions and the information will pop right out in front of you(at least thats how it has been for me)....sure...if I could 'get rich' from forcing terrorcrats into involuntary bankruptcy you know Iwould be there...but I'll be the first to admit that it takes alot of balls to go through with it...and I have not done it....but right now I know that the vast majority of these codes, statutes, violations blah blah blah are completely useless and I will not give away FRNs to the municipalities and there compelled performance admiralty f*ckjob....thank you....p.s......there is no single method that "WORKS EVERY TIME"....ask yourself what you are trying to 'get' and you will find the answer, just my 2 cents.....
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-31-2006, 10:37 PM
Jerseee's Avatar
Jerseee Jerseee is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,837
artificialsteve,

Taking unnecessary risks with a commercial game created and constructed for those that run it and change the rules every day, is a terrible way to learn sovereignty. In fact, I discourage many from using the devil's tools to build an unethical home.

Use the law, not codes or statutes. these too are commercial things that you have already recognized.

Sovereignty does not depend on anything except your belief in yourself that you know the truth about who you are and who they are. This is sovereignty. It starts in the mind first. It does not come from purchasing a book, going to a seminar, paying a government agency to recognize it, filing papers to proclaim it and get it recognized...none of these gadgets.

A4V is one of those gadgets. It is things like this that give JRB and Shoonra the energy they need to do what they do on this site. They know as well as I do that none of this stuff can be proven--because it will take for someone on the Federal Reserve Board of Trustees to admit to it publicly.

I appeal to everyone---please stop using this stuff and use the Law. Just because the leaves are moving in the trees does not mean that the wind is blowing--someone could be shaking or chopping the tree from the bottom. This makes leaves move too!

Just my thoughts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by artificialsteve
I have been studying this a4v process and I am under the impression that it is used for setoff and adjustments to the PRIVATE side of accounts(look that word up!)
I cant PROVE it works but there are a lot of things you must try YOURSELF....because there are too many JUDGE ROY BEANS out there who are trying to paint a picture for you...that exemptions, remedies, recourses, uniform commercial codes and all the rest of that fun stuff....are completely useless......suuuuuure....thats why we are all failing right ROY??...give me a break...
.....The information is here...but it takes a LOT of hardwork and studying in order to grasp the potential of being sovereign....just trust your instincts and have PURE intentions and the information will pop right out in front of you(at least thats how it has been for me)....sure...if I could 'get rich' from forcing terrorcrats into involuntary bankruptcy you know Iwould be there...but I'll be the first to admit that it takes alot of balls to go through with it...and I have not done it....but right now I know that the vast majority of these codes, statutes, violations blah blah blah are completely useless and I will not give away FRNs to the municipalities and there compelled performance admiralty f*ckjob....thank you....p.s......there is no single method that "WORKS EVERY TIME"....ask yourself what you are trying to 'get' and you will find the answer, just my 2 cents.....
__________________
"FOR AS HE THINKETH IN HIS HEART, SO IS HE."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Stamp Ice Misc. Discussion 4 05-03-2004 12:48 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:56 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer