Banking without SSN

[georgealexander]

with Masterduke.....

To fill out your accurate precis, House was 'schmoosed' by 'The Round Table' in England before USA, INC got involved in the war. House used 'The Round Table' as a model to create a couple of similar 'think tanks' here in America: The Council on Foreign Relations and.......my mind fails...intelligence agency, I guess.

Certainly 'Phillip Dru' was THE blueprint, which is it's 'enduring value'.

Wilson and House were estranged in the later years of the Wilson presidency.

My point was although the subject 'letter' or 'transcript' may state facts apparent today, just as 'Phillip Dru' does, it is obvious House COULD NOT have written it and Wilson WOULD NOT have written it.

Couple that with Wilson-House estrangement and Wilson's (or someone in control of Wilson) refusal for a death bed reconciliation with his Irish secretary/political pundit - lead me to believe there is a bigger story.

I still believe the 'letter' is a fake.

BTW,
quote:
He was also a horndog and was probably susceptible to blackmail and collusion.

I have led a sheltered life.......what is a 'horndog'?

George Alexander

[idknow]

Originally Posted by georgealexander

with Masterduke.....

To fill out your accurate precis, House was 'schmoosed' by 'The Round Table' in England before USA, INC got involved in the war. House used 'The Round Table' as a model to create a couple of similar 'think tanks' here in America: The Council on Foreign Relations and.......my mind fails...intelligence agency, I guess.

Certainly 'Phillip Dru' was THE blueprint, which is it's 'enduring value'.

Wilson and House were estranged in the later years of the Wilson presidency.

My point was although the subject 'letter' or 'transcript' may state facts apparent today, just as 'Phillip Dru' does, it is obvious House COULD NOT have written it and Wilson WOULD NOT have written it.

Couple that with Wilson-House estrangement and Wilson's (or someone in control of Wilson) refusal for a death bed reconciliation with his Irish secretary/political pundit - lead me to believe there is a bigger story.

I still believe the 'letter' is a fake.

BTW,
quote:
He was also a horndog and was probably susceptible to blackmail and collusion.

I have led a sheltered life.......what is a 'horndog'?

George Alexander

canus infidelus
lol

[masterduke]

I used to have a stray dog I adopted and he was a great dog until one of the poodles in the neighborhood would come in heat and then it was off to the races. Hes was the first guy there and the last one to leave (2 weeks) wishin' and hopin'! Going to round him up all the time was annoying but thats how God made him. Fence him in he would climb, dig, or chew his way to freedom. Make him a dope on a rope? he would pull up the stake or clothes pole or fence post to get back to Fifi's!!! Hope that answered the question as did idknow canus infidelus latin term lol

[idknow]

Originally Posted by masterduke

[cut]

Hope that answered the question as did idknow `canus infidelus' latin term lol

Glad to oblige and highlarious retort!

[EnSabahNur]

Originally Posted by ThinkingWolf

Good day all:

Any comment on whether I should use postal money orders vs. checks written against a bank account opened without an SSN, or some other method of "paying the bills" without using an SSN?

I once viewed a document nicely outlining some friendly cites to present to the banking official whom denies a new account without SSN... can't seem to locate it now, anyone help?

Thanks

I had zero problems opening an account in Canada with no SIN, it simply had to be a personal chequing account that is non-interest bearing.

[idknow]

Originally Posted by EnSabahNur

I had zero problems opening an account in Canada with no SIN, it simply had to be a personal chequing account that is non-interest bearing.

so they get to use *your* money for free
and you get to pay all the fees?

put a fee on them for using your money!!!

BRING BACK THE INTEREST BEARING ACCOUNTS!

[EnSabahNur]

Originally Posted by idknow

so they get to use *your* money for free
and you get to pay all the fees?

put a fee on them for using your money!!!

BRING BACK THE INTEREST BEARING ACCOUNTS!

Don't worry, the account is for cashing cheques ONLY. I do not keep a balance, and I deal strictly in cash. I only opened it to see if it would be a hassle since I usually go straight to the account holders bank to cash it.

I have nothing more to offer on this thread, I thought I would simply add that the SIN# it is definately optional here at the chartered banks, but I also know that it is their newest ploy and they have re-defined the bank act to make it appear that it is an artificial opening an account through a natural-person, and they think they have us fooled.

I think not. I have not filed Income Taxes in 8 years anyways, and I have heard nothing from the CRA. They sent a rep. to my house about half a year ago, I invited him in for a cup of coffee, he said I had to file or he would have me charged for failure to file taxes....they have sent nothing since. I told him I have not acted in that capacity for 8 years now. When he asked to see all my receipts that I have kept I informed him that I have none. When he followed up by telling me that I am required to keep recepits and I must produce them, I asked him if I was being forced to testify against myself. He left and has not called again.

End point, who cares about the bank account. Keep a zero balance and do not testify against yourself and they are left scratching their as**s wondering what to do. If you have a zero balance, let them try to prove the SSN/SIN earned a profit that year.

Hahahaha, good luck.

[idknow]

Originally Posted by EnSabahNur

Don't worry, the account is for cashing cheques ONLY. I do not keep a balance, and I deal strictly in cash. I only opened it to see if it would be a hassle since I usually go straight to the account holders bank to cash it.

I have nothing more to offer on this thread, I thought I would simply add that the SIN# it is definately optional here at the chartered banks, but I also know that it is their newest ploy and they have re-defined the bank act to make it appear that it is an artificial opening an account through a natural-person, and they think they have us fooled.

I think not. I have not filed Income Taxes in 8 years anyways, and I have heard nothing from the CRA. They sent a rep. to my house about half a year ago, I invited him in for a cup of coffee, he said I had to file or he would have me charged for failure to file taxes....they have sent nothing since. I told him I have not acted in that capacity for 8 years now. When he asked to see all my receipts that I have kept I informed him that I have none. When he followed up by telling me that I am required to keep recepits and I must produce them, I asked him if I was being forced to testify against myself. He left and has not called again.

End point, who cares about the bank account. Keep a zero balance and do not testify against yourself and they are left scratching their as**s wondering what to do. If you have a zero balance, let them try to prove the SSN/SIN earned a profit that year.

Hahahaha, good luck.

So, if the bank account is empty, why hasnt the bank closed the account?
I dont understand. In years, and I do mean years, it has always been my experience
with bank accounts that a zero balance causes the bank to move against it and close
it down.

Excuse a naive question, but where you wrote "acted in that capacity," are you referring
to

1. using the STRAWMAN; or,
2. being an actual, registered corporation by an act of legislature?

I'm just seeking the whole picture.
(I do understand that the CRA is essentialy the same as the IRS here)

Thanks

[ThinkingWolf]

Originally Posted by HenryBowman

To the original post, I would counter:

Why would anyone want to keep fake money in an account at a bank?

I don't see the logic in it.

Henry Franklin

P.S. I think the quote is "hor****" (I got to use my word.)

Mr. Franklin:

For my labor I am given a check from a large corporation, Cashier's Check, Money Orders or FRNs are not optional AND its bank is well out-of-state.

What do you suggest?

Thanks for your time.

Not being Mr. Franklin, I'd like to interject an answer anyway.

When you get the check,

Turn it over.


Write:

No Liability Assumed - No Value Assured
Without Recourse

Henry Franklin d/b/a/ HENRY F. BOWMAN

then autograph in red, and place your right thumbprint in red.

I always let my thumbprint cover part of the above disclaimers, and part of my autograph.

Present it to a teller at the bank it is drawn on.

Say, I have a draft, drawn on your bank, which I am presenting for acceptance.

Then, watch them run to the head teller, call a huddle for 5 minutes, and come back and give you FRN's.

At least, this has been my experience.

Henry Franklin