what the heck is a private international administrative remedy demand

keeping this simple: private (your private and not public venue business). administrative (the government uses administrative rules, procedures against you, NOT law, thus you can do the same), international (sovereigns are foreign to statutory entities).

The more I learn, the more questions I have, and the more question I have, the closer I come to resolving the pros and cons of the various approaches offered in this forum (and others).

research1 states:

Determination of the venue takes understanding and further, if you want to go big the venue and remedy can be big, however this of course requires a great deal of understanding.

research1 touches on what may be the quintessential point: what venue does one go to in order to resolve collection issues with CAs?

The problem is that despite using Private International Administrative remedies, the liaryers and CAs manage to drag sovereigns into their courts where the sovereign's chances of prevailing are slim and none.

reasearch1, my question then is: should the sovereign avail himself of the United States Court of Federal Claims as the proper venue in which to exercise his sovereign rights? And would he be exercising these rights under international law? If so, then yes, a LOT more knowledge is necessary.

However, my quagmire is this: how can one claim to be a sovereign when one used their fiat money and credit system? Let's assume you used their fiat money and credit system AND SUBSEQUENT TO THAT decided to void all of your contracts with BB and become a sovereign. That's all well and good. However, you cannot now come back and undo what you agreed to as a subject just because you are now a sovereign. The legal entanglements are obvious and many, but more importantly you are behaving IMMORALLY, imho. Whether or not you understood their fraudulent system is immaterial. And how fraudulent is it really when The People have the power to change it and do not? (Yes I know, some might argue that the system has been corrupted beyond The People's ability to affect change. I don't have an answer for that.) However, you do understand it now, which means you could have understood it then had you made the effort. Please don't respond by saying that you didn't even know that you were living in the matrix. My response to that is: "Oh well, life can suck sometimes. Grow up. Get over it. Move on."

So where does this leave you? Well, that's where proving the fraudulent inducement into the contract comes in. Now you are using their rules to fight them at their own game. That is what Ice, SJ, Jerseee, et. al. continue to harp on in this forum, AND WITH GOOD REASON. Capiche?

Research1, I welcome your thoughts on my comments above re: the USCFC as I do from Ice, SJ, Jerseee, et. al. re: my comments in general.

B.

Originally Posted by joma44

I found only one reference and that was on a findlaw question board and somebody and their lawyers were scratching their heads and asking the same thing. the answer given was that the experts didnt know why not ask the source.



so



what is it?

Please cite where it comes from.

is it a real legal principal?

what does the numbering system notate?



thanks

I visit the findlaw boards frequently. Which board in particular raises these questions about the administrative remedy??

cute_chick,

i ran across this hit in google earlier tonight, interestingly enough just before i ran across this post.

http://boards.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin...E0@.ef068a9/58

i just did a search for - private administrative international remedy
and it came up. the most interesting thing is that these guys/gals are actually scratching their heads about this. From reading the few exchanges it seems the intent is a bit different in this case (and perhaps completely off the mark) but one would think they would atleast understand the intent from the title and perhaps question the actual implementation. This seems pretty obvious when you know what the words mean.

"i just did a search for - private administrative international remedy
and it came up. the most interesting thing is that these guys/gals are actually scratching their heads about this. From reading the few exchanges it seems the intent is a bit different in this case (and perhaps completely off the mark) but one would think they would atleast understand the intent from the title and perhaps question the actual implementation. This seems pretty obvious when you know what the words mean."

Well folks just keep sending out those VODs and master the arts of legal research, persuasive writing, civil and criminal procedure, and legal citation. We're setting legal precedent here!

As a follow up to research1's post on this matter, I suggest that anyone wanting to better understand this topic should check out the definition of Private International Law and Conflict of Laws in Black's.

[Campy]

Wow, I am so excited!!

Can someone provide me with a little help on one area?

Ont the CPN page, is this promisory note being made out to the Creditcard Company or the Colllections Agency that sent me the letter?

Please advise!

Thank you

Campy

[Bird]

Campy:

No advice, just a thought. The CPN should be made to whoever is asking for payment.

[KITCHIE]

Here is what I did.

I sent John Snow and Exempt Exchange Item (EEI) otherwise known as a BOE. Then I sent the mortgage co a copy of the EEI along with actual and constructive notice that they comply with TD 25-06. TD 25-06 is a computer system that matches account numbers. I waited for the next contract (statement) and paid. Then I sent VP and Senior Council as well as others who injured me an NOTICE OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CLAIM WITHIN THE ADMIRALTY ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY 28 U.S.C. §1333.

The mortcage company and the parent company have remained silent. I sent them a notice of fault and opportunity to cure, notice of default, notice of closure and settlement, 2nd notice of settlement, and constructive notice of settlement. Tomorrow my notary will be sending a notice of dishonor which contains a paragraph "Noting for Protest". Then she will do an notice of protest and finally a certificate of protest.

Final step the notary files in the UCC office with the protest docs.

After that's all finished...I can sell the NOTICE OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CLAIM WITHIN THE ADMIRALTY ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY
28 U.S.C. §1333.

Kitchie

[web]

Hi Kitchie, Congratulations on your progress. I would like to ask if you could share an update? Have you had any luck selling the judgment?