
03-16-2006, 06:13 AM
|
|
|
|
Court Assistance Please!!!!
Hi,
I will make this as concise as possible. I received a collection notice approx 6 months ago. I have some familiarity with VODs so I sent them one CRRR. 33 days later after no response I then sent a 2nd VOD letter,CRRR, with a fifteen day window for response, indicating the doctrine of estoppel would be utilized in my defense if there was no response, which there wasnt. However, I have now received a notice of summons regarding this matter. I want to slaughter them in front of a judge but I need help. I know there are references all over this site but no step by step guide on what to do. Help please!!!!!!!
BTW the DCA is this Wolpoff & Abramson!!!!!!!
Last edited by refiman1 : 03-16-2006 at 06:33 AM.
|

03-16-2006, 07:18 AM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
|
|
|
refiman1, welcome to the forum!
__________________
Resolution pending
|

03-16-2006, 07:21 AM
|
|
|
What state are you in? How old is the debt (last time you made a payment)? Try to give us some more details without personal info. 
|

03-16-2006, 07:46 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Water Wonderland
Posts: 1,185
|
|
|
If that Summons contains the header "account, account stated" or something similar, which is a wolpoff/debt attorney sneaky way of sticking you. There is a short time window like 10 to 20 days(depending on the state where you live, regardless of the court date indicated) that you have to file a counterclaim against the summons otherwise their suit has standing regardless of what you did in the past with dunning letter replys (you can address that later) Conterclaiming their allegations is imperative to stave off what will be a slam dunk for them, either by you not showing up in court or when you go to court, the judge siding with them. The opening statement is tied to some law case cite that they use and it effectivly shifts the burden of proof from them to you. It will be tied to some old court ruling that found someone responsible for a debt to some entity. And thats how they the begin to velcro this crap to you. And the judge is an eager participient.
|

03-16-2006, 08:01 AM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Terra
Posts: 601
|
|
|
Dont forget to RECORD all affidavits into the county record.
__________________
At Arms-length.
|

03-16-2006, 08:24 AM
|
 |
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 901
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by refiman1
Hi,
I will make this as concise as possible. I received a collection notice approx 6 months ago. I have some familiarity with VODs so I sent them one CRRR. 33 days later after no response I then sent a 2nd VOD letter,CRRR, with a fifteen day window for response, indicating the doctrine of estoppel would be utilized in my defense if there was no response, which there wasnt. However, I have now received a notice of summons regarding this matter. I want to slaughter them in front of a judge but I need help. I know there are references all over this site but no step by step guide on what to do. Help please!!!!!!!
BTW the DCA is this Wolpoff & Abramson!!!!!!!
|
You're swimming with sharks, so I'd make two recommendations:
http://www.budhibbs.com (learn about your enemy)
http://www.creditinfocenter.com (forums)
|

03-16-2006, 08:28 AM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Judge Roy Bean
|
Hehehehehehe!! Very funny, JRB.
__________________
Resolution pending
|

03-16-2006, 05:42 PM
|
|
|
|
Can anyone help?
|

03-17-2006, 09:19 AM
|
|
|
|
What documents have they attached to the complaint? Usually, the JDBs attach nothing more than a unsigned and undated credit card agreement. If they have sued under the account stated COA, then they must attach an itemized statement, which must show every credit and debit from the time it was opened until it was closed. If this is not attached, file a motion to dismiss, it is unlikely they will be able to survive that attack. Estoppel probably won't work as a defense unless you can prove fraud, misrepresentation or deception on their part.
|

03-17-2006, 01:06 PM
|
|
|
|
erwqgqggqqerg
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:55 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|