Banks, Collectors, and CRAs Discuss the elimationa of secured and unsecured "debt", as well as tactics for dealing with debt collectors and credit reporting agencies.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Banks, Collectors, and CRAs
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-05-2006, 10:37 AM
logos logos is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Connecticut Republic
Posts: 266
Send a message via AIM to logos
Bank dishonors their own draft

I presented to CHASE bank today a check for 25.00 USD drawn on them and they flat-out refused to honor it. Their dishonor was not due to NSF, invalid ID, etc. They said it's their policy to dishonor them if presented by a non-customer (in person), though they do honor them if presented by a bank. I tried to tell them they have a fiduciary obligation to honor it and that duty is not dependent on the holder being a customer, etc. They invited me to call their executive branch in New York.

Even if one gets a notary to memorialize their dishonor, how much recourse does one really have? How would one go about nailing them?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-05-2006, 11:00 AM
macerico macerico is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by logos
I presented to CHASE bank today a check for 25.00 USD drawn on them and they flat-out refused to honor it. Their dishonor was not due to NSF, invalid ID, etc. They said it's their policy to dishonor them if presented by a non-customer (in person), though they do honor them if presented by a bank. I tried to tell them they have a fiduciary obligation to honor it and that duty is not dependent on the holder being a customer, etc. They invited me to call their executive branch in New York.

Even if one gets a notary to memorialize their dishonor, how much recourse does one really have? How would one go about nailing them?
Welcome to my world one year ago.

Except, the bank would not honor the check unless I paid a fee for cashing it.

Totally illegal, but you have no real option EXCEPT try reporting them to state/federal agencies. They did nothing for me since the bank said it would "honor" the check if I paid them a fee to do their duty. In your case, I'm pretty sure they cannot refuse an in-person presentment.

It's all a push to make us go cashless. Nothing more.
__________________
Eat your bread....
Watch the circus....
....Ignore the Visigoths.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-05-2006, 12:03 PM
Judge Roy Bean's Avatar
Judge Roy Bean Judge Roy Bean is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 901
Unfortunately, it's not illegal for them to jerk people around like this. If memory serves, there was a Federal (California) case that decided in the bank's favor, but I'd have to go digging to find it.

It's simply a way to charge fees. They are very creative.
__________________
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
Creditoris Squaliformes
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-05-2006, 07:23 PM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
Yep!! once you don't have account with them they will jerk you around, even if you talk to the supervisor,all they going to say, it's against their policy to cash the check for non customer. What a jerk.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-06-2006, 01:07 AM
logos logos is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Connecticut Republic
Posts: 266
Send a message via AIM to logos
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judge Roy Bean
It's simply a way to charge fees. They are very creative.
Though I was expecting to hear them ask for it, they didn't demand a fee. It was simply dishonor & refusal to perform their fiduciary duty. I intend to inform their executive branch of this sorry episode to see if this truly is CHASE'S policy or just that branch going rogue. If it's policy, I'll talk to the state banking authorities though I suspect they'll do nothing w/o proof. I've been told by someone who's been in the financial industry for years that if the bank is FDIC insured (CHASE admitted so) they must honor it, though I haven't confirmed this.

I'd like to nail them just on principle.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-07-2006, 08:42 PM
powder's Avatar
powder powder is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: district of Alberta
Posts: 538
Send a message via Yahoo to powder
It is all in the wording

What wording did you use when the instrument was "presented"?
__________________
Without Prejudice - No Liability Assumed - No value assured - Without recorse
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-07-2006, 08:45 PM
Judge Roy Bean's Avatar
Judge Roy Bean Judge Roy Bean is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 901
Quote:
Originally Posted by logos
Though I was expecting to hear them ask for it, they didn't demand a fee. It was simply dishonor & refusal to perform their fiduciary duty. I intend to inform their executive branch of this sorry episode to see if this truly is CHASE'S policy or just that branch going rogue. If it's policy, I'll talk to the state banking authorities though I suspect they'll do nothing w/o proof. I've been told by someone who's been in the financial industry for years that if the bank is FDIC insured (CHASE admitted so) they must honor it, though I haven't confirmed this.

I'd like to nail them just on principle.
Chase is a Federally-chartered bank, so the state has limited power to regulate them.
__________________
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
Creditoris Squaliformes
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-07-2006, 10:26 PM
Jerseee's Avatar
Jerseee Jerseee is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,837
Their game and their rules. And I bet they quote the UCC as supporting their position.

This should be a flashing red light when the UCC is discussed.

Logos,

play the game and expose it while playing it. this way, you get what you want and you can do what you are trying to do. I say, go with the flow and don't paddle just yet---then at the right moment, pull out your paddle.

have fun
__________________
"FOR AS HE THINKETH IN HIS HEART, SO IS HE."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-11-2006, 10:19 PM
ChrisCC
 
Posts: n/a
This is one of those issues that just frosts my hide. Although there may be a Appellate ruling, it is B.S. For them to charge one class of people and not another is in restraint of free trade, which is illegal...they charge individuals presenting checks but not ACH clearing checks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Judge Roy Bean
Unfortunately, it's not illegal for them to jerk people around like this. If memory serves, there was a Federal (California) case that decided in the bank's favor, but I'd have to go digging to find it.

It's simply a way to charge fees. They are very creative.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-12-2006, 09:05 AM
theghost theghost is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 228
Bank dishonors their own draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by logos
I presented to CHASE bank today a check for 25.00 USD drawn on them and they flat-out refused to honor it. Their dishonor was not due to NSF, invalid ID, etc. They said it's their policy to dishonor them if presented by a non-customer (in person), though they do honor them if presented by a bank. I tried to tell them they have a fiduciary obligation to honor it and that duty is not dependent on the holder being a customer, etc. They invited me to call their executive branch in New York.

Even if one gets a notary to memorialize their dishonor, how much recourse does one really have? How would one go about nailing them?
Logos, if you are the one entitled to present this instrument (your name is on the "Pay to the order of" line), and you presented acceptable I.D., then you have a commmercial dishonor, and I doubt that even local policy would allow this, and certainly not corporate policy.

The thing to do is go back to the bank with a notary, with a notarial protest in hand, and get the manager of the bank to dishonor their instrument in the presence of the notary. I'm willing to bet that they will cash the check. If they do dishonor again, then follow the procedures to bring a complaint against the bank, in admiralty, with damages (a topic for another post).

I have experienced this same thing, although I did not return with a notary, I convinced the manager to do it on the spot. I did remind him that he cannot dishonor their own instrument, even though I was not a customer, and he agreed. They also tried the fingerprint crap, for which I loudly refused, telling me it was "the law", if you can believe that!! I asked them, is it "the law", or is it your policy"? They cashed the check, without responding.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
20 UCC Provisions Every Banker Should Know Admin Articles & News 6 07-05-2006 06:25 PM
Cites - Case Law Prohibitions on Banking suijuris Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 41 03-17-2006 04:50 AM
It is truly amazing what you can prove with the right people under oath. jaylon Court 2 09-09-2005 09:09 AM
proper service cobra7 Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 60 05-16-2005 12:54 PM
Statutes At Large vs. U.S. Code weishaupt1776 Court 7 04-15-2005 04:20 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:10 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer