Removal of funds from bank account

I was recently noticed of removal of funds from my bank account to satisfy a judgment on a discover card account. There was also issued a Writ of execution to the sheriff to seize personal property to satisfy the alleged debt. I have disputed the debt, asked for verifcation, and demanded that they produce the original document, to all of which they have provided no substantive response, and have proceeded with total disregard for any of my requests. The matter went to a hearing (without me) and my responses to all thier letters were stricken from the record, and a judgment was rendered. I have a few questions

1) Can they lawfully remove funds from me or my bank account without a Garnishment hearing?

2) Is there any notice or process I can use to keep the Sheriff from executing said Writ?

3) As I have never been to court for anything, can someone explain how to go about vacating a void judgment?

Any response and help would be greatly appreciated. LT2DOGS

[gregtu]

Check your file at the courthouse!!!

I have disputed the debt

if you really did that, therein lies your problem...



anyway, look into richard cornforth's stuff. i think there's a link or so in the downloads section here...



jon

[gregtu]

They can't remove money from your account without a judgement against you signed by a judge. DEMAND the bank to provide their policy on garnishment.

The original "contract" you signed has an "offset" allowance, whereby they CAN remove funds from all other accounts you may have there.



Even with the Caveat-Constructive Notice received telling them you have discovered their fraud without scienter, doesn't deter "collections".



We are under Military Rule, folks.

They do whatever they WANT to the enemy (us).



Read your history, we lost America when the North "won" the civil (yeah right) war !!!



Reconstruction Acts ARE Military Rule. There was NO treaty of peace.



Congress "left the building" after the Southern States seceeded . . . thereby NULLIFYING the Constitution.



Lincoln imposed the Lieber Code - Common Law of War, and then FDR declared the US (all persons of and anyplace subject to the jurisdiction thereof) under the Trading with the Enemy Act !!!



The 5th Amendment against "taking without just compensation" is supposedly still applicable - even UNDER War Powers . . . .

[TheBlackTruth]

I must disagree in part:



It is my understanding that when the Southern states walked away from the table we ceased to have a "quorum" which nullified the du jure GOVERNMENT, but the constitution was still in force and effect as the signatures thereopon were still valid.

[Jerseee]

I agree with Blacktruth,



Whether an illusion or not--the basis of all they do is still rooted in the living document. There is an aire of truth in Arement's post--however, the civil war was a distraction--since it did not matter who won--the bankers needed the war to happen one way or another. Either way the outcome would be the same--one economy.



I apologize but this is slightly off the subject of the forum.