LVNV Funding LLC/Sherman Acquisition II LP

[gatorguy3]

I just received a notice in the mail from attorneys for the two companies mentioned in the title. LVNV is acting on behalf of Sherman Acquisition as their asignee.

I received a "Plaintiff's Motion for Continuing Writ of Garnishment" and documents for "Claim of Exemption and Request for Hearing."

I can claim exemption as I am being garnished for support currently, which is based on 90% of total support provided for my child. However, I was wondering what I am "agreeing to" if I file this exemption. The hidden stuff is what I am curious about.

Thanks in advance.

[gatorguy3]

One more point, on my last paystub there were two separate entries for garnishment. I thought the one for the smaller amount was for arrears. I am thinking, now, that it was for this particular garnishment. I was never informed previously from my employer or anybody else about the other garnishment. Do I not have the right to be informed why they are taking money from my check?

[masterduke]

From comming from the same black hole, they (employer, bank, court, debt buyers, ad nausem) do not have to tell you, the garnishee, anything. Since the judgement has already been granted by the creep in the robe and its all legal, nice and tight. If they did not have any court date or hearing informing you that this was going to happen then, (which some "judges" and debt buyers have a very cozy "working" relationship and don't feel any need to inform the mr & mrs lunchbuckets of the impending screwing) if that is the case you may be able to get the judgement vacated (also depends on the blob wearing the black sheet) I hope you can get some answers. Both sides are supposed to be informed in civil matters(yeah right) to prevent any "suprise" tactics in court. I would ask for a copy of the court order "authorizing" the theft. These people are the trash of the earth, its almost as if you can see the slime oozing out their cheesy, tailered suits.

[gatorguy3]

Understandable. I guess I am going to file the Claim of Exemption because I am exempt since I provide 90% of support for my child, also through garnishment. Then, as soon as I am able, I will file Chapter 7.

[masterduke]

Make sure you have comptent representation in the BK effort!! Thats where our troubles began as we had hired a "law" firm that specialized in BK's (little did we know their REAL nickname amongst their fellow bar members was; The Bankruptcy Butchers) they screwed it up so fiercly that it was dismissed as a "frivolous attempt at obtaining bankruptcy protection"??????!!!!! and we were sanctioned! Lawyers, ya got love 'em, yeah right.... Recently began the process of obtaining legal counsel, as doing it Pro Se only diverted the skunks for awhile and ultimatly, with assistance from the jerk presiding, we got worked. It is going to be costly but it will be worth it, just to have the ability to tell wolpoff where they can stick it. Those rotten excuses for human excerment.

[masterduke]

I thought in Florida they can only steal your money if you make over $500 a week? Where we live the threshold is a whopping $130 a week. How "genorous" of them eh?

[KITCHIE]

Hey gatorguy3!!

If you havent already filed for exemption, I suggest you do a void judgement. I have one that I have perfected based on Cornforth.

e-mail me and I will be happy to send you one so that you can make it fit your situtation.

Kitchie

[gatorguy3]

In Florida the exemption is you have to make more than $500 a week and/or you cannot be providing more than 50% of care to a child (as head of household). I am under both exemptions...not to mention the state is garnishing close to half of my weekly income for support.

Kitchie,

I have not filed the exemption yet. Actually, I was going to file it this morning as I only have about another 10 days, I think.

The "garnishment" has already shown on my paystub, though nothing has been deducted. The amount still shows "0" deducted.

I will try to message you just as I post this reply.

[Sharing Lights]

Originally Posted by KITCHIE

Hey gatorguy3!!

If you havent already filed for exemption, I suggest you do a void judgement. I have one that I have perfected based on Cornforth.

e-mail me and I will be happy to send you one so that you can make it fit your situation.

Kitchie

Yes, it appears that voiding the judgment is the best route in this case.

Dear gatorguy3!

I hope you would take KITCHIE's opinion and follow up on her assistance to you.


Also, follow this link below and continue reading by the keywords "LVNV" "Sherman" "resurgent" "ventus."

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/search.php?searchid=72348

and from
Post# 178 at:

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/banks-...ection-18.html



They are the same fraud artists run by the Sherman Financial Group located in New York.

http://sfg.com

I posted on them actively, would add much more, and would engage them in Court,
as well as unleash the Authorities on them full force.

Also realize that the LVNV Funding LLC is a dissolved firm.
Such can not take a penny from anyone.
If can, post when LVNV has contacted you and when was the first attempt/act
of garnishment and the last.

Embezzling monies, being a dissolved firm is a very serious crime.

Do not give them a penny.
Don't write to them before you understand completely what is going on.

They have broken the laws and must be held accountable.

Only precise knowledge of laws and your rights would accomplish that.

So, please, do not rush, learn enough, as all the knowledge is here already.

Let us know how is your progress and remember - you ar not in the jungle -
you are among the Sovereigns here and we care.



It is time to provide the nail to the coffin of these vampires.

I believe the People have, really, had enough of them.

[gatorguy3]

Well, it seems my employer contracted an attorney of theirs to help me with this situation. The line on my paycheck has since disappeared and I have heard nothing more from the creditor.

I do get letters from other creditors now and again, but nothing comes of it.

QUESTION. Isn't there a 3 year SOL on keeping credit on a report if there is not a judgment? I seem to remember seeing something about this in the past. I'm not sure though.