ADL Equates Sovereigns With Terrorism!

[ndusa]

Ndusa, why don't you realize how hopeless and stupid you look affirming aginst your inherent sovereignty?

I'm not the one looking like a nut case.

BTW, The ADL is not an authority, and their research is flawed... propaganda.

Yep, sure, never worked in any of my cases LOL!!

And you should ceace calling people "nut cases"... you are the one that lacks the ability to determin reality from fiction... and would support killing people for crossing imaginary lines...

Well, that would be no different that people like you who killed inocent woman (burned them alive) because of your belief in a fiction called 'GOD'.

And who the hell are you to tell me what to call people? I call it as I see it, a bunch of crack-pot, delusional, religouse fanatics!("Gods Law", what a joke, sounds like terrorism to me!! They have their own little holy war, you have yours)

If the People, holding offices of public services in the state, don't honor the 1st Amendment of the Constitution then they are no longer in office

What a crock of sh#t! Who told you that!? Prove this! You can't, more sick babblings comming from a crack pot.

[Codee]

1992 is when the article is from.

The DOJ has cleaned house and round up a bunch of the really bad seeds,,, like Elvick and Buhts.

Now the issues are not so hot.

[aksis]

Originally Posted by ndusa

I'm not the one looking like a nut case.

Actualy... you are. It's because of your mental disorder.

You also look weak minded and are obviously on a dis-empowerment trip and would try to influance people into this self defeating bull**** with fear based scheems.

Originally Posted by ndusa

Well, that would be no different that people like you who killed inocent woman (burned them alive) because of your belief in a fiction called 'GOD'.

People like me? You don't know me. You have never put any effort into getting to know me. Never.

How did your sick little mind draw this conclusion? How is it that, because I testify to the existance of God (because I know that God exists), that I must also be someone who would endorse/participate in burning people at the stake?

Originally Posted by ndusa

And who the hell are you to tell me what to call people? I call it as I see it, a bunch of crack-pot, delusional, religouse fanatics!("Gods Law", what a joke, sounds like terrorism to me!! They have their own little holy war, you have yours)

I'm not the one that is a party to a war... it was one of the main reasons I expatriated.

I doubt we would even be having this conversation face to face... I have seen your type for over a decade... get on line and talk ****... do you still use AOL?

Originally Posted by ndusa

What a crock of sh#t! Who told you that!? Prove this! You can't, more sick babblings comming from a crack pot.

Oh... I see... In your mind, government officials can keep their jobs if they violate the law, huh? How silly of me...

So you think I am a "crack pot" because I think that a public servent, who is violating their Oath of Office, is no longer holding Office.

So your position is that it's ok for government employees to break the law... because they are the government.

As to you demand for proof, I don't have to prove something so obvious.

You prove that government employees can disregard/violate the Constitution and still keep their jobs... and then we shall truly see sick babblings comming from a crack pot.

[ndusa]

Originally Posted by aksis

Actualy... you are. It's because of your mental disorder.

You also look weak minded and are obviously on a dis-empowerment trip and would try to influance people into this self defeating bull**** with fear based scheems.

People like me? You don't know me. You have never put any effort into getting to know me. Never.

How did your sick little mind draw this conclusion? How is it that, because I testify to the existance of God (because I know that God exists), that I must also be someone who would endorse/participate in burning people at the stake?

I'm not the one that is a party to a war... it was one of the main reasons I expatriated.

I doubt we would even be having this conversation face to face... I have seen your type for over a decade... get on line and talk ****... do you still use AOL?

Oh... I see... In your mind, government officials can keep their jobs if they violate the law, huh? How silly of me...

So you think I am a "crack pot" because I think that a public servent, who is violating their Oath of Office, is no longer holding Office.

So your position is that it's ok for government employees to break the law... because they are the government.

As to you demand for proof, I don't have to prove something so obvious.

You prove that government employees can disregard/violate the Constitution and still keep their jobs... and then we shall truly see sick babblings comming from a crack pot.

You babble and assume WAY to much.

[David Merrill]

Yep, sure, never worked in any of my cases LOL!!

You are an attorney? (Rhetorical question actually.)

See attached state for mental wellness check:




Regards,

David Merrill.

[aksis]

Originally Posted by ndusa

You babble and assume WAY to much.

Behold you[r] mirror.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by ndusa

Yep, sure, never worked in any of my cases LOL!!

What cases?

Show me.

You keep making unsubstantiated claims as to your "cases" but show nothing!

Not once.

Never.

Show, stop talking.

Montana or North Dakota?

[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by mrg

What cases?

Show me.

You keep making unsubstantiated claims as to your "cases" but show nothing!

Not once.

Never.

Show, stop talking.

Montana or North Dakota?

Dear Mrg;


There might be a number of reasons Ndusa will not broadcast details of these cases. The sanctity of remedy means nothing to Quatlosers. I have many success stories too. Which brings me to my point.

Ndusa is taunting and disturbing. He is behaving identically to me among the Quatlosers - attorners. I approached them in good faith to see if they could rationally and logically justify US clerk behavior that is contrary to the Rules for instance. All I got was a bunch of insults.

I stayed and still bother them even now. They will even cut-and-paste me there to bother themselves. Interestingly they can cut and paste me there and get a couple-hundred Views over a week or more, then I post one meaningless post and get two-hundred more Views in a day! So I am on a lot of Buddy Lists out there in cyberspace - I am getting the word out to a lot of people who read and do not comment. So at least I have a purpose in posting what seems a highly unique form of trolling...

So believe me when I tell you that Ndusa is simply enjoying that he can get you upset that he boasts of cases, success stories, that you will spend time and energy trying to extract details for. He probably has no success stories, or he might have some; that is not my point. Even if he has some successes he is not about to help us with them - like me and the attorneys on Quatloos, he is only here because he views us as some kind of enemy.

He is getting you to take the bait.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[ndusa]

Originally Posted by mrg

What cases?

Show me.

You keep making unsubstantiated claims as to your "cases" but show nothing!

Not once.

Never.

Show, stop talking.

Montana or North Dakota?

Its a little hard to prove something when I can't attach things here. I've complained about this bull**** for some 4 months. I can't upload either, or would be posting this stuff. Seems other can, but I can't.

[ndusa]

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Dear Mrg;


There might be a number of reasons Ndusa will not broadcast details of these cases. The sanctity of remedy means nothing to Quatlosers. I have many success stories too. Which brings me to my point.

Ndusa is taunting and disturbing. He is behaving identically to me among the Quatlosers - attorners.

So believe me when I tell you that Ndusa is simply enjoying that he can get you upset that he boasts of cases, success stories, that you will spend time and energy trying to extract details for. He probably has no success stories, or he might have some; that is not my point. Even if he has some successes he is not about to help us with them - like me and the attorneys on Quatloos, he is only here because he views us as some kind of enemy.

He is getting you to take the bait.



Regards,

David Merrill.

DM, please don't compair yourself and me again.

Clearly from you post above, you are a slanderizing peace of work too.

Just another example of someone who doesn't know their ass from a hole in the ground.