Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Citizenship & Jurisdiction
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-31-2007, 03:16 PM
weasel's Avatar
weasel weasel is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: California
Posts: 267
Send a message via AIM to weasel
removing myself from votor registration this week via local voter registrar. license comes due this summer, when i make my appearance at the dmv, planning to sign the new contract in such a way as to reserve all rights, such as 'without prejudice'
__________________
"My brain's in shutdown overload!"
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-31-2007, 07:14 PM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by weishaupt1776
W/o/p is better than the A.R.R.

If you are not seriously studied on the Cali DMV stuff, I would sign the license w/o/p
Weis is right. It's work like a charm when you sign W/o/p under your authograph.
__________________
Resolution pending
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-01-2007, 02:39 AM
palani's Avatar
palani palani is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlesa6
Weis is right. It's work like a charm when you sign W/o/p under your authograph.
w/o/p goes first, then the authograph .... :-)
Can't amend a contract once it is signed
__________________
Its' a dog eat dog world and I am wearing milkbone underwear!!!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-01-2007, 04:21 AM
mrg's Avatar
mrg mrg is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by palani
w/o/p goes first, then the authograph .... :-)
Can't amend a contract once it is signed

Do you have to write the whole thing out or just w/o/p?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-01-2007, 05:25 AM
palani's Avatar
palani palani is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrg
Do you have to write the whole thing out or just w/o/p?
Just an opinion but I would write 'without prejudice' somewhere in the body and sign it below. If added after the signature or below the signature (position wise) it could be interpreted as being added after the signature (time wise).
__________________
Its' a dog eat dog world and I am wearing milkbone underwear!!!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-01-2007, 06:55 AM
charlesa6's Avatar
charlesa6 charlesa6 is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Illinois(chi-town)
Posts: 5,076
You have to write the whole thing out under your signature not before your signature. "Without Prejudice UCC 1-308". No institution ever questions the authenticity of it.
__________________
Resolution pending

Last edited by charlesa6 : 06-01-2007 at 06:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-01-2007, 07:42 AM
mrg's Avatar
mrg mrg is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by palani
Just an opinion but I would write 'without prejudice' somewhere in the body and sign it below. If added after the signature or below the signature (position wise) it could be interpreted as being added after the signature (time wise).

On affidavits and other such docs it usually goes beneath the signature line along with the Upper Lower "name"
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-01-2007, 10:29 AM
palani's Avatar
palani palani is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrg
On affidavits and other such docs it usually goes beneath the signature line along with the Upper Lower "name"

I guess I had always understood the term to be one of the conditions that was being agreed to and, as such, had to be on the doc before the signature went on.
__________________
Its' a dog eat dog world and I am wearing milkbone underwear!!!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-01-2007, 10:34 AM
Market Trader Market Trader is offline
Waking Up
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlesa6
You have to write the whole thing out under your signature not before your signature. "Without Prejudice UCC 1-308". No institution ever questions the authenticity of it.

When can a person start writing this under his signature?
IE Should your status be corrected already or does it not matter?

Also: has anybody ever not taken a signature like that? and does 'ALL RIGHTS RESERVED' mean the same?

And 'Under Protest' comes in under what cirumstances.

Thanks M/T
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-01-2007, 11:33 AM
Akira-'s Avatar
Akira- Akira- is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Maine state
Posts: 320
You only need write "Without Prejudice "... not the "whole thing"... and it goes ABOVE the signature, not below.

http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/freeman/freeman4.htm

Quote:
EXAMPLE


Your Honor, my use of "Without Prejudice UCC 1-207" above my signature on this document indicates that I have exercised the "Remedy" provided for me in the Uniform Commercial Code in Book 1 at Section 207, whereby I may reserve my Common Law right not to be compelled to perform under any contract, or agreement, that I have not entered into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. And, that reservation serves notice upon all administrative agencies of government -- national, state and local -- that I do not, and will not, accept the liability associated with the "compelled" benefit of any unrevealed commercial agreement.


Quote:
ADDENDUM


U.C.C. 1-207:4 Sufficiency of reservation.

Any expression indicating any intention to preserve rights is
sufficient, such as "without prejudice," "under protest," "under
reservation," or "with reservation of all our rights."
__________________
I'm not a rapist, I'm a defacto lover !

"Damn democracy. It is a fraudulent term used, often by ignorant persons but no less often by intellectual fakers, to describe an infamous mixture of socialism, miscegenation, graft, confiscation of property and denial of personal rights to individuals whose virtuous principles make them offensive." Westbrook Pegler: New York Journal American, 1/25/51, entitled "Upholds Republic of U.S. Against Phony Democracy, Democracy in the U.S. Branded Meaningless"

Last edited by Akira- : 06-01-2007 at 11:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cites - Registration suijuris Travel 14 08-08-2007 03:28 PM
Registration/impound Friendsplacect Travel 6 10-31-2006 02:56 PM
Title/Registration/MSO SKYGZR Travel 4 10-11-2006 03:15 AM
Pet registration juststartingout Misc. Discussion 5 06-01-2005 09:06 AM
voter registration juststartingout Citizenship & Jurisdiction 0 10-27-2004 10:11 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:48 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer