Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Citizenship & Jurisdiction
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2008, 07:32 AM
palani's Avatar
palani palani is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 976
Federalism

Right out of the Federal Register
http://frwebgate3.access.gpo.gov/cgi...io n=retrieve

Quote:
C. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

Executive Order 13132 requires DHS and DOS to develop a process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' Policies that have federalism implications are defined in the Executive Order to include rules that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' DHS and DOS have analyzed the rule in accordance with the principles and criteria in the Executive Order and have determined that it does not have federalism implications or a substantial direct effect on the States. The rule requires U.S. citizens and nonimmigrant aliens from Canada, Bermuda and Mexico entering the United States by land or by sea from Western Hemisphere countries to present a valid passport or other identified alternative document. States do not conduct activities subject to this rule. For these reasons, this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.
I would guess that this represents public notice that the rule being discussed (passport requirements) have no impact on state nationals.
__________________
Its' a dog eat dog world and I am wearing milkbone underwear!!!

Last edited by palani : 04-28-2008 at 07:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-28-2008, 08:59 AM
palani's Avatar
palani palani is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 976
Since the direct link I gave does not appear to work properly you may find the exerpt above in Federal Register April 3, 2008 Vol 73 No 65 (Rules and Regulations) http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/Index.html regarding new Homeland Security rules for
Quote:
Documents Required for Travelers Departing From or Arriving in
the United States at Sea and Land Ports-of-Entry From Within the Western Hemisphere

Also observe they have made the following determination as well
Quote:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ ``U.S. citizens'' as used in this rule refers to both U.S. citizens and U.S. non-citizen nationals.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

This appears to exclude "non-U.S. nationals" from any of the requirements.
__________________
Its' a dog eat dog world and I am wearing milkbone underwear!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2008, 03:29 PM
Notorial dissent Notorial dissent is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 600
The directive is referring to the fact that it does not impact the "states" since they do not, and cannot, operate customs and immigration services, or ports of entry into the US. Customs, immigration, and passports are strictly a Federal province.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Federalism versus Nationalism weishaupt1776 Citizenship & Jurisdiction 5 03-30-2005 06:13 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:21 PM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer