Within This State

[Dillon Hunt]

Originally Posted by hippy

Heres California's procedure rule of how the Common law applies to the code.

The rule of the common law… has no application to this Code. The Code establishes the law of this State respecting the subjects(U.S. Citizens) to which it relates, and its provisions and all proceedings under it are to be liberally construed, with a view to effect its objects and to promote justice. California Code of Civil Procedure §4.

(U.S. citizen) is inserted so you understand who or what the subject of the code is

The subjects could also mean it's employees !

Bouvier's law dictionary:

STATE. This word is used in various senses. In its most enlarged sense, it signifies a self-sufficient body of persons united together in one community for the defence of their rights, and to do right and justice to foreigners. In this sense, the state means the whole people united into one body politic; (q. v.) and the state, and the people of the state, are equivalent expressions.

PROVISION. The property which a drawer of a bill of exchange places in the hands of a drawee; as, for example, by remittances, or when the drawee is indebted to the drawer when the bill becomes due, provision is said to have been made. Acceptance always presumes a provision.

JUSTICE. The constant and perpetual disposition to render every man (not every corporation) his due.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Right to the Castle

That piece of straw you are grabbing for is not going to float in the grand rapids of court.

What "court?"

A BAR brothel?

[weishaupt1776]

state = body politic

territory = the actual land

14th amendment = Federal Citizenship emanating out of DC

United States Citizen = of 14th Amendment body politic HQ'd in DC

"within this state" = within the 14th amendment body politic located in the territory of Washington

It is possible to be located within the territorial boundaries of Washington , but still not be "within the STATE OF WASHINGTON"

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON is the corporation acting in a proprietary capacity as a "person" registered w/ D &B and foud in the RCW

The state of Washington is the actual government as found in the Constitution

[netwrkranger]

Is hippy Codee??

If the presumption that hippy is Codee is valid, why is he debating himself??

What's with the split personality screen names? Schizophrenia??

[netwrkranger]

... and no rebuttal ???

Will this presumption stand as fact by default?

- netwrkranger

[Jerry Pitts]

Originally Posted by hippy

Who or what is codee?

Well, it has already been determined that 'codee' is not an attorney, but rather is just like 99.9% (guestimating) of the other members of this forum. Ordinary men and women who express their personal views and personal interpretations of what they THINK the law is and what they THINK the law means.

Jerry Carlos
Ambassador of Jesus, the Christ.

[Jerry Pitts]

Originally Posted by hippy

Much like the attorney's and lawyer's that frequent the forum.

Seek out the definitions of the terms "attorney" and "lawyer" and then come back with an explanation of your intent behind those terms and I will give consideration to responding to your comment above. Without having cognizance of YOUR meaning and intent, I dare not communicate any further at this point in regard to your comment.

Jerry Carlos
Ambassador of Jesus, the Christ.

[Jerry Pitts]

Originally Posted by hippy

I know what attornment means and lawyer.

The comment was a joke. Besides are you an attorney or a lawyer?

Perhaps the administrative agents of this forum should open a new category within their index entitled "jokes/humor" wherein such comments can be placed and be within a proper area of concern.

As to your question as to whether or not I am an attorney or lawyer. To me those are both secular terms and both have entrapments within the secular law arenas. Therefore, in response to your last question, No! I am not an Attorney nor a Lawyer. I am an incorporeal being, inhabiting the physical persona that is commonly recognized under various nomens belonging to the physical world, and none of those nomens have either prefix or suffix that could be construed as representing the physical part of me as either 'lawyer', 'attorney', 'esq.', or any other label other than what my King has authorized me to represent to the secular world.

Going back now to your prior comment in regard to "Much like the attorney's and lawyer's that frequent the forum.", I will reiterate, that IMHO, this forum is not the proper place for levity.

Jerry Carlos
Ambassador of Jesus, the Christ.

[Jerry Pitts]

Originally Posted by hippy

OHH....!!
Your one of them!
Self made, self rightious.

One of them? Do I detect a note of sarcasm or cynicism or even prejudice and bias? Perception is an awful thing, because it is often not laden with truth.

Originally Posted by hippy

Well Mr. Ambassador,
Why do you act like your above everyone else? Thats not being humble.

First of all, there is no "Mr." placed before the title. Again, perception is an awful thing. See the above comment on perception. I do not act. That is the job of men and women who conduct their affairs for compensation within a specialized field for which I have never received any professional training. Humble is knowing when you are face to face with your sovereign, and when I am in the presence of my Sovereign, I am the most humble man that you have ever met. You are not my sovereign, you are an equal, in that you also are an incorporeal being inhabiting a physical persona. Other than that, I know you not, therefore it would be impossible for me to conceive that I might be better than you or even better off than you.

Originally Posted by hippy

Is it because [ I ]you think you are?
Or maybe [ I ] you think you know something?
Or is it [ I ]you want to think you are by using them there BIG words that you prop yourself up with?

The answer to all of the above questions above would be an emphatic NO! Of course if you substitute the bracketed [ I ] in place of the "you", then you would have to answer those questions.

Originally Posted by hippy

Jesus Christ never acted the way you are or for that matter spoke in the tone of belittlement and He is above everyone.

I have no dispute in your acknowledgment that "He is above everyone." He is my Sovereign, so I know full well what you impart with those words. You seem to overlook the recorded scenario of when Jesus, the Christ, took a whip and chased certain men out of the temple. In the eyes of the secular world, would that not be a condition where Jesus, the Christ, placed those men who were under the whip in a belittling situation?

Originally Posted by hippy

Christ will knock you a few notches to the level grasshopper, so quite acting like something your not like the attorney or the lawyer.

Yes, Jesus, the Christ, my Sovereign, has the capacity of knocking men and women down "a few notches". No argument with that concept. When He (Jesus, the Christ) then sees that the man or woman who has been knocked down a few notches, has likewise repented of his/their errors, Jesus, the Christ will also 'raise them up again'. Great is the goodness and mercy of my King, Jesus. As stated before, I am not an actor. I am not a lawyer nor an attorney. Should you perceive me as one, then you need to check out your ability to perceive reality, as I have stated the reality of the situation.

Originally Posted by hippy

You know Mr. Fake in my 40+ years in the flesh I've learned that when people say they are something. They are in reality lying.

Sorry, I do not know Mr. Fake. Am I supposed to know him? Well, in my 59 years in the flesh, I have learned quite a few things about the nature of man also. One of those things that I learned was to never speak or write a declaration that is easily dis-proven. Example: If George Bush were to stand in front of the American People and make the declaration (referring to himself) "I am the President of the United States."; According to you and your above stated standard, George Bush would be lying.

Have a nice evening.

Jerry Carlos
Ambassador of Jesus, the Christ.

[Jerry Pitts]

Originally Posted by hippy

Look in the mirror and reflect a bit.

I don't really care to be gazing in a mirror, because in my own opinion, I am not a handsome man. LOL.

Originally Posted by hippy

Lets test your ability to understand scripture.

A religious test? For what purpose? Its' a good thing I am not running for office.

Originally Posted by hippy

What is 666?

It is a three digit numerical symbolism. Scripturally it is symbolic of the entity known as the 'beast'. As to the actual (secular world) interpretation of the symbol, there are many and varying interpretations. One such interpretation is that through a Qabalistic procedure, it can be converted into the digits 295408296. Ironically, that conversion is equal to a social security number that was issued on or about 1966 in Cincinnati Ohio. What is your interpretation of it? I choose none personally. Though I do find it curious that men and women have sought the meaning of it for centuries and it still remains a mystery. Why a mystery? Because it cannot be proven by secular means.

Originally Posted by hippy

What are the three happenings that make up 666 that points to satan?

Your question above is rather oblique. Would you please rephrase the question or just come on out display your wisdom. Either will do fine.

Originally Posted by hippy

Or are you one of those that beleives in the "any moment doctrine", "rapture" and the "flying up in a cloud doctrine"?

No man knoweth the hour or the day when the Lord will return. Anyone that says that they do know, are standing in defiance of the scripture. Which one of the three choices above do you prefer?

Originally Posted by hippy

The wise understand it and know it. Ezekiel and Mathew know. They wrote about it. Its in plain view in Revelations. How wise are you?

In the above paragraph, you mentioned 'it' four different times, but do not give 'it' a point of reference as to what 'it' is. Wisdom? Who said anything about being wise. You did.. You learned within your 40 + years, that men who say they are something, in reality are lying. As for my wisdom ; I defer to the scripture;
1 Corinthians 17. For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.
18. For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.
19. For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.
20. Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?
21. For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe."

Originally Posted by hippy

I ask because I beleive you are not what you think. You try to pull the wool over with BIG words like a professional attorney and then claim your better than thou.

Hippy; you seem to be having a problem reading. Please show me where I have said that I am "better than thou". Did I NOT say that we are "equals"? Big words? If you are offended by the use of 'big words', then you are definitely in the wrong forum, as I am not the only man or woman on this forum that uses 'big words'. Are you also going to attack anyone else on that same basis? Don't be intimidated by the bigness of words. Look them up if they are above you comprehension. Educate yourself. Don't get offended by it. I don't recall anyone saying anything to you about your choice of words.

Originally Posted by hippy

What a HIPPICRIT!
If you dont know what 666 is then you will not know if it the return of Jesus or satan.
Who comes first?

Expound to us Oh Great man of knowledge. Enlighten all of us with your profound wisdom of the ages. Because if you can convince even one man or woman, with PROOF POSITIVE, of 'what 666' is, other than a three digit number that is symbolic of many things, then I will offer you an apology for having questioned your writings.

Jerry Carlos
Ambassador of Jesus, the Christ.