Secret Agreement Signed to Amalgamate Canada, US and Mexico

[Freedomless]

Here is a secret meeting that had to be a secret. Maybe the reason for the borders left unsecured.

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3601

Originally Posted by Freedomless

Here is a secret meeting that had to be a secret. Maybe the reason for the borders left unsecured.

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3601

How convienant he has absolutely no proof that such an agreement exists. I should get into the patriot news business - you can pretty much make up whatever you want, then when someone asks for proof, you tell them it's a vast cover-up, that's why there's no proof.

Also, if the meeting was so secret, how does this guy know about it. Not much of a secret, is it?

duh.

[Freedomless]

Agent 09, you are proving more and more that you were/are the same Agent as 08. I am usually right about people and I believe you to be a traitor.

[iamfreeru2]

Originally Posted by buck09

How convienant he has absolutely no proof that such an agreement exists. I should get into the patriot news business - you can pretty much make up whatever you want, then when someone asks for proof, you tell them it's a vast cover-up, that's why there's no proof.

Also, if the meeting was so secret, how does this guy know about it. Not much of a secret, is it?

duh.

Could be as secret as the IRS losses that the general public is unaware of. Just because a few know what is going on doesn't mean all do. In that regard many things are secret. The general public is unaware that the Bilderberger's meetings are secret too. Are you stating that their meetings are fabrications? They have been known about for years by those of us that know the truth. Does the general public know about them? I think not. Kind of makes them secret, huh.

[weishaupt1776]

Buck, why is it that the news media never reports on the Bilderberg meetings when it involves many of the most powerful leaders in the world?

They consistently stay away from it. WHY ?

http://bilderberg.org/

Originally Posted by Freedomless

Agent 09, you are proving more and more that you were/are the same Agent as 08. I am usually right about people and I believe you to be a traitor.

I was just pointing out that the article has ZERO certifiable facts, other than what that guy says is true. If you're OK believing what your read without demanding facts to back it up, just say so.

Originally Posted by weishaupt1776

Buck, why is it that the news media never reports on the Bilderberg meetings when it involves many of the most powerful leaders in the world?

They consistently stay away from it. WHY ?

http://bilderberg.org/

Yeah, no mainstream media outlet will touch those Super-powerful-kill-you-if-you-look-crosseyed-at-them illuminati.

Well, execpt for:

The BBC
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3773019.stm

CNN
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...bilderberg.htm

The New York Times:
http://www.bilderberg.org/2004.htm#NYT

The Guardian of London:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/netnotes/a...231830,00.html

Asia Times:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EE22Ak03.html

Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group


What was that you were saying about them constantly staying away??

The reason you don't see more reporting (in America) is because American news reports on what people want to see, because it sells ads. The bilderbergs are super-boring to nearly everyone execpt those who are paranoid about all the wrong things. Listen to the BBC some time - you'll hear reports on things like the G8, bilderburg, CFR, etc - that's because they actually report on global events (boooring) and not things people get all excited about like missing teenage girls in Aruba.

Originally Posted by iamfreeru2

Could be as secret as the IRS losses that the general public is unaware of. Just because a few know what is going on doesn't mean all do. In that regard many things are secret.

Well, you're straying a bit from the topic (the bilderbergs get plenty of press - see my other post).

Back to this article, I was simply pointing out that this guy who claims to know the truth about a secret document signing, produces NO PROOF that such a thing took place, other than his say-so.

Could you point me to ANY verifiable proof that:

When Presidents Bush and Fox and Martin had their secret meeting in Crawford, TX in March 2005 in secret, they laid out the amalgamation of Canada, US and Mexico that will be followed by the absorption of the CAFTA countries forming a single state of North America.

No? Didn't think so. Look, if you want to believe things without verifiable proof, just be honest enough to say so - I won't think any less of you - anyone honest enough to admit that deserves my respect.

[weishaupt1776]

Then how come, none of the reporters are allowed in to report on the meetings?

You and the newspapers can be as flippant as you want & use the buzz word ,"conspiracy theory", but no one is allowed to hear the real deal in those meetings.

[iamfreeru2]

Originally Posted by buck09

Well, you're straying a bit from the topic (the bilderbergs get plenty of press - see my other post).

Back to this article, I was simply pointing out that this guy who claims to know the truth about a secret document signing, produces NO PROOF that such a thing took place, other than his say-so.

Could you point me to ANY verifiable proof that:



No? Didn't think so. Look, if you want to believe things without verifiable proof, just be honest enough to say so - I won't think any less of you - anyone honest enough to admit that deserves my respect.

I never said it was true or untrue. You are inferring it is untrue so I would suppose perhaps you can provide the proof it is untrue, eh? All I was pointing out is that there are many things that are secret because it is kept from the general public. Don't want too much truth getting out now.