Are You Sui Juris ?

weishaupt1776 · #1 10-04-2005, 09:23 AM

Another Fine article from LB

Very sobering

David Merrill · #2 10-09-2005, 01:52 AM

deleted post.

David Merrill · #3 10-09-2005, 04:42 AM

deleted post.

weishaupt1776 · #4 10-09-2005, 05:57 AM

David, with all due respect, for us earthlings, what was your intent of your posts in light of the Title of This thread and in regards to the article which was posted?

David Merrill · #5 10-09-2005, 07:21 AM

Apologies;

I wish posts could be deleted.

Some crosstalk among Suitors about 1933 War and Emergency Powers was thrown in. Hoping to edify.

Note the section (b)(1) under jurisdiction attached. It is quite compulsory to avoid revealing the nature and cause of the accusation. [Refer to the origin link.] Therefore no arraignment is ever acquired. Any cause against a man or woman relies upon acquiescence; silence upon the Answer. The judge enters a plea if you do not, on the presumption of arraignment - assumed power of attorney*.

Regards,

David Merrill.

Quote:

* From 1828 Webster's ATTORN. To turn. In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassals, or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate

weishaupt1776 · #6 10-09-2005, 01:59 PM

I find what you posted to be a success story seems like.
I need to MAKE time to study your stuff

David Merrill · #7 10-10-2005, 07:19 AM

I attribute my poor communication skills to mastering the Trachtenberg Speed System of Basic Mathematics. It seemed obvious that the failure to recognize sui juris character is directly linked to the implementation of War and Emergency Powers of 1933. So I blurt it out there because for the most part, it was on my mind. Using Crosstalk to suitors was also a bad idea. These folks have published judgments in place res judicata and that lends a certain perspective.

So I should not expect fresh readers to be able to get the context.

Regards,

David Merrill.

weishaupt1776 · #8 10-10-2005, 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Merrill

It seemed obvious that the failure to recognize sui juris character is directly linked to the implementation of War and Emergency Powers of 1933.

Ahhhhhhhhh........ Now I'm with you - - -on that one at least

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Merrill

I attribute my poor communication skills to mastering the Trachtenberg Speed System of Basic Mathematics.

[b]I had to re-teach myself math several years ago
looks like I'll be doing it again now.
I found some free software for the Trach methodology

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Merrill

So I blurt it out there because for the most part, it was on my mind. Using Crosstalk to suitors was also a bad idea. These folks have published judgments in place res judicata and that lends a certain perspective.

So I should not expect fresh readers to be able to get the context.

Congratulations on the successes, David