Need advice with recording standards

[kran sanis]

On July 24, I filed my expatriation paperwork with the State Recorders Office. I am however curious as to the recording standards and what to expect in reference to proper and improper recording.

I received my paperwork back from the State today, although I was told to expect the paperwork to be returned within 5 weeks, I am curious for the 3 week delay and am also curious with the return address on the upper left corner, which reads;

STATE OF ALASKA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESORCES
SSD/STATE RECORDERS OFFICE

Is there a reason for the DNR to be on the return address? Am I a Natural Resource now and not a Citizen?

I know that no governmental entity can deny my compact with the contract/covenant know as the Constitution for the (u)nited States of America nor are they allowed to hinder my constitutional right to amend my jurisdictional status. I am however leery to those under the color of law and wish not to receive a surprise later down the road that may lead to default for improper recording.

All may be right as rain, but still would appreciate any advice in this matter.

Thanks in advance.
Kran

[David Merrill]

It smells like your bond is accepted:

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/articl...ry-2006-a.html

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/attach...g?d=1154817615

[charlesa6]

Yeah, that’s the way the record of deed set it up; they have to include their address as well as yours at the center.
Remember, once you received the package that means is accepted and recorded and that is the copy of your confirmation doc enclosed.
I don’t see any problems at all.

You the real man, shouldn't have any contacts left or BENEFITS, if you want to be truely out of the system, unless maybe , just an hypothetical, you assign it.
Am I not right on that?
Also, how many forms do you have to fill in doing it thru the state and can you do it thru any state you happen to be in?

My take is that one can go thru a common law crt
venue to get it done, then you have a court decision that cannot be overturned unless you change something with it.

I am trying to figure out which process has less forms to fill out I guess. Or maybe you could do your process first then do the other as well or the common law one.

Originally Posted by kran sanis

On July 24, I filed my expatriation paperwork with the State Recorders Office. I am however curious as to the recording standards and what to expect in reference to proper and improper recording.

I received my paperwork back from the State today, although I was told to expect the paperwork to be returned within 5 weeks, I am curious for the 3 week delay and am also curious with the return address on the upper left corner, which reads;

STATE OF ALASKA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESORCES
SSD/STATE RECORDERS OFFICE

Is there a reason for the DNR to be on the return address? Am I a Natural Resource now and not a Citizen?

I know that no governmental entity can deny my compact with the contract/covenant know as the Constitution for the (u)nited States of America nor are they allowed to hinder my constitutional right to amend my jurisdictional status. I am however leery to those under the color of law and wish not to receive a surprise later down the road that may lead to default for improper recording.

All may be right as rain, but still would appreciate any advice in this matter.

Thanks in advance.
Kran

Contracts rather then the word contacts, ok

Originally Posted by easynbwc2

You the real man, shouldn't have any contacts left or BENEFITS, if you want to be truely out of the system, unless maybe , just an hypothetical, you assign it.
Am I not right on that?
Also, how many forms do you have to fill in doing it thru the state and can you do it thru any state you happen to be in?

My take is that one can go thru a common law crt
venue to get it done, then you have a court decision that cannot be overturned unless you change something with it.

I am trying to figure out which process has less forms to fill out I guess. Or maybe you could do your process first then do the other as well or the common law one.

[David Merrill]

You the real man, shouldn't have any cont[r]acts left or BENEFITS, if you want to be truely out of the system, unless maybe , just an hypothetical, you assign it.

Am I not right on that?

I will discriminate between right and realistic. The purpose of remedy is to be able to get in and out of commerce at will. Acquire the benefits of honest business without getting creamed by presumptions of mandatory and irrecusable obligations to perform.

I have no DOB or birth certificate.

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...tification.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ification2.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ification3.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ification4.jpg

I utilize that fact all the time. For instance novation:

http://Friends-n-Family-Research.inf...ovation_ER.jpg

So Grasshopper; you must contemplate the sound of one hand clapping before you will finally understand...



Regards,

David Merrill.

[kran sanis]

David,

I am always in awe of things you say. In and out of commerace at will. Love the concept.

easynbwc2,

Greetings and salutations.
Sadly to say, I do have past “contracts” still out there, this filing was the first step and proclamed my domicile and Jurisdictional status to the state of Alaska, whom must now assume to protect me from all acts and warrents of a foriegn jurisdiction not organic to the laws of the land.
There are past judgments out there, but I am confident in my knowledge of Constitutional law and regard them ALL to be VOID and not just voidable. I will discharge them at will and in the manner of our fore-fathers, with truth and temperment of the common law (Article III).

There is the matter[s] of Birth Cert. Social Security , Federal Income taxes- All seperate and with different levels of retract and estopple with thier own affidavidts of intent. Am beginning correspondence with the Secretary of State to obtain documents to instruct the Secretary of the Treasury to no longer assume that my private person is liable for a federal income tax. To instruct employeer to stop withholdings, must be prepared to petition the Secretary of the State for correspondance to the District Court to halt all acts of admirality/Maritime jurisdiction if a foriegn jurisdiction is asserted against my private person.

In theory, the forms are endless, it depends how far you are willing to contract yourself. A sovereign should always do all his/her dealings in a contract of one form or another. An affidavidt is the usual form in common law.

As to going through a ”commonlaw court” in my asservation and oath purgatory, I swore on Oath to assume the characteristics of a ”supreme court de jure borough sitting in common law jurisdiction”. I spoke of my domicle of being within the Greater Anchorage Area Borough, and not within the Municipality of Anchorage, I included that theryby being a member of the American Christian Citizenry I am in explicit compact with the covenant/contract known as the Constitution for the (u)nited States of America circa 1787. I acknowledged that venue shall be the American Republican form upon which the soil required by my character and standing in law, as a private Christian.
I included that I do in fact trade in lawful money of account of the (u)nited States of America, Silver, with like parties of capacity.
I spoke of Jurisdiction being only under the (u)nited States Flag of Peace.

With the duly action of the recording forever more establishes my character and conclusive presumptions to any and all dispute and/or assumptive presumption(s) by any and all agents of a foriegn jurisdiction, be they of any nature or kind, in particular, dba corpiagents under operation and authority of U.S.C. Titles and Statutes.

Sooo, I guess there is no easy way to say this, but... there is a lot of paperwork if you wanna be proper person and persona, BUT in my book its worth it. No matter what.

Good luck and God speed!
Kran