|
The way I do that is by presenting (NOT "appearing' - PRESENTING!!), my real live flesh and blood human body in the set of the fictional court room. The actor who plays the judge really does also exist as a real live flesh and blood human being just as I do. When he comes out dressed in his costume (black robe), he is doing the same thing a movie actor would be doing when the movie actor, dressed in the appropriate costume, takes his position on the stage of a movie set; but the actor remains in his real live flesh and blood human being status until the action starts.
Then, when the "action" starts, the real live man on the bench assumes his fictional role as a judge and
the room (set), becomes a court in the political fiction and everyone who participates MUST also don
the role of a fictional character in order to "appear" in the fictional court.
My "job" is to know when and how to yell "CUT"!!
When the director of a Hollywood fictional depiction yells "CUT" all of the actors drop out of their fictional roles and resume their flesh and blood entities and turn their attention to the real live director who then gives them real live instructions telling them to do this or that in order to have the fictional presentation to be done as he wants. Then, after the director has given his instructions to the real live flesh and blood actors he then yells, "ACTION!!" and all of the actors immediately put aside their real live flesh and blood persons and don the personalities of the fictional characters; the actors then "appear" as the fictional characters they are depicting in the fictional story they are acting out. Everyone who participates in the fiction can only do so by "appearing" in the role of a fictional character!!
So, in the fictional court, when the judge says, "Next case" that is like the director saying, "Action", and
everyone then dons their fictional roles and they all then "appear" on the set and begin acting in their
fictional characters. That is when I need to yell, "CUT", in order to get all the actors to drop out of
their fictional roles and revert to their real live human entities so I can talk to them in their flesh and blood human being form and not as an actor in a fictional court; except I do not yell, "CUT", what I do
is say, "Just a minute, we have here an issue of political jurisdiction to resolve!!" And, thereupon,
the actor playing the judge drops out of his position of authority over me and reverts to his real live
flesh and blood human entity and becomes a man with no more authority than any other man.
At that moment the actor playing the role as "judge" is no longer a fictional judge, he is a real live flesh and blood person, by name of Mr. Smith (or whatever his name is), and as Mr. Smith, a flesh and blood human, he has no political jurisdiction over me because no one then present at that point is in an assumed fictional role, because I refused to don the fictional character as a "defendant" when the "judge" said, "Next case" and I said, "Just a minute, we have here an issue of political jurisdiction to resolve."
At this point I will address the judge as Mr. Smith, not as judge Smith or as Your Honor. This is because at this point he is NOT in his role as a fictional court officer, he is in his real live physical human being entity, and I need to make it clear that I am not "appearing" in their political fiction. Until it is established that the political fiction has political jurisdiction over my real live flesh and blood human form, Mr. Smith is not a judge, as far as I am concerned!!
When I refused to "appear" on stage (by raising the issue of political jurisdiction), I effectively told Mr. Smith (not as "judge Smith" but as Mr. Smith), "I have not joined the Screen Actors Guild (I have not volunteered into US citizenship BUT I AM MOST CERTAINLY NEVER EVER GOING TO SAY THAT!!!*), so I cannot assume this fictional role and the "play" cannot go on with me involved until my status as an actor in this fiction is resolved."
* It is not up to me to tell the perps what my political status is or to tell them that I have not volunteered!!! It is up to them to prove that they have political jurisdiction over me and I do not have to give them any clues!!
It is thereupon the responsibility of the actors, in their real live flesh and blood entities, to produce
proof that I have, indeed, in the past, voluntarily agreed to participate in their political fiction; which it is totally impossible for them to do without my acquiescence.
In previous instances the perp judge has done one of two things:
(1) Stated that he does have jurisdiction, or state that he does have political jurisdiction. In either event I would say, "FOR THE RECORD, I am not "appearing" in this political fiction, I am present here in my real live flesh and blood human being entity and, FOR THE RECORD I want to know on what basis you are claiming that this fictitious political entity has political jurisdiction over my real live flesh and blood human being entity!! When he does not respond within 30 nano seconds I will then say, "There is no possible way that this fictional political entity can establish political jurisdiction over me so this matter is concluded, is expunged from your fictional records and I am departing", and I would walk out.
Or I might say, "As you have of your own volition stated that you do have political jurisdiction, would you please explain what political jurisdiction is and how it is that you have it over my real live flesh and blood human form."
Every time any variation of the forgoing has occurred the perp judges have said absolutely nothing to the Sovereign who then walked out.
(2) Asked questions. Most often the perp judge will ask some question to try to establish jurisdiction, such as, "What is political jurisdiction?" My response would be, "If you don't know it is quite obvious that you do not have it. Therefore, this matter is concluded, is expunged from your fictional records and I am departing.
Or the perp will say, "There is no such thing as political jurisdiction." I would respond, "As it is self evident that governments do not exist in nature, then it reasonably follows that governments can only exist as political fictions and everything done under the jurisdiction thereof would be done under political jurisdiction, so then what you are saying Mr. Smith, is that the government under which this fictional court purports to be a sub entity does not exist. That being your position it reasonably follows that this court has no authority whatsoever, even as a political fiction, so therefore, you could not possibly have any political jurisdiction over me, good day."
Or I might respond, "As you have stated that political jurisdiction does not exist you must know what political jurisdiction is, so would you please explain, for the record, why it is that you claim that political jurisdiction does not exist.
I could say at any time after the perp judge addresses the issue of political jurisdiction over my real live flesh and blood human form, that as it is my understanding that under the separation of powers doctrine, the judicial branch is deemed to be neutral and not a party to litigation brought before it, so, if that is the case, then how is it that the judicial branch is attempting to establish political jurisdiction over my real live flesh and blood human form, the judicial branch is clearly doing what is clearly the responsibility of the executive branch?? As the purported neutral party has clearly exhibited a strong bias in favor of the complaining party, this matter is deemed terminated, expunged from your fictitious records and I am departing.
Cheers,
I'm Eric WhoRU
|
