39dollars vs. 350

mystic one · #1 10-29-2006, 06:53 PM

If anyone has experience with davids LOR, method, please share your personal story.

As david was saying, you can win just on your "Evidence Repository " Alone, but dont expect the clerk to stamp your summons form or it to be recognized by the district court. However, the district court provide the summons form free of charge?? Are the summons forms provided free of charge, and there just charging for the stamp and signature of the clerk?
One, could still publish judgement, just on the evidence alone, by just establishing this evidence repository..

However, if one chooses to go the expensive route, you can pay the clerk 350 dollars to stamp and sign your summons form you requested from her.

Has anyone have verifiable experience winning on both technicalities, just evidence rep, and also the exp route 350, if so please state it here.

mystic one · #2 10-30-2006, 03:46 PM

comments please.

idknow · #3 10-30-2006, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mystic one

comments please.

One, none yet...

David Merrill · #4 10-30-2006, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by idknow

One, none yet...

Without a summons the cause never reaches judgment. The authorized summons will cost $350. However you can acquire the "exclusive original cognizance" of the US for $39.

I have been explaining this consistently and correctly in my posts.

I doubt any suitors will be speaking up here in this forum or thread. I have recommended that they do not. My reputation in cyberspace is irrelevant. I get information somewhat akin to psychological profiling here and other places like Quatloos.

If you have not the chutzpa to just cure remedy for yourself, it will remain elusive.

Regards,

David Merrill.

mystic one · #5 10-31-2006, 05:20 AM

David,

A fellow "suitor" recommended issuing a 1 page contract to your advesary if they keep sending mail to your commercial person. and also to put the postmaster on notice that you do not accept mail, from anybody other than your true name.. Furthermore, in the contract, it can state for each letter that they submit, you will charge them 500 dollar fine for penalties and legal fees.

This may have been a good suggestion in the forum as this as what i was eventually trying to go with this.. Thus with a properly isssued "contract" with suitor, postmaster on notice, and refusals in evidence, this generally nips stuff in the bud 9 times out of 10 without having to issue a formal complaint.

David Merrill · #6 10-31-2006, 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mystic one

David,

A fellow "suitor" recommended issuing a 1 page contract to your advesary if they keep sending mail to your commercial person. and also to put the postmaster on notice that you do not accept mail, from anybody other than your true name.. Furthermore, in the contract, it can state for each letter that they submit, you will charge them 500 dollar fine for penalties and legal fees.

This may have been a good suggestion in the forum as this as what i was eventually trying to go with this.. Thus with a properly isssued "contract" with suitor, postmaster on notice, and refusals in evidence, this generally nips stuff in the bud 9 times out of 10 without having to issue a formal complaint.

That kind of hearsay is unacceptable in a competent jurisdiction.

But I will disqualify it anyway. Any notice to the postmaster will be according to law and the mail manuals. In other words all one can do is notify the postmaster of the obligation to deliver all mail to a certain address there. It can be to Mickey Mouse and if it is prepaid, it will go into that box.*

If a suitor was trying to adjust the performance of the postmaster from his prescribed job duties, that was out of order.

Regards,

David Merrill.

* And even if it is not prepaid, it will be delivered with a notice of postage due - a true bill. You as screener can return the presentment (R4C) or pay up.

P.S. The origins of the issue are when somebody screens out specific material with an unused and unwanted legal or full name (not specific to upper and lower case letters now). The carrier will sometimes say, "Berry good then! You will get no mail at all to First M. Last from now on!"

That carrier's "notice" should be refused for cause immediately - "You will continue doing your job and I will continue being the sole screener for all mail coming into this box. You will deliver any and all mail material specifying and prepaid to this location regardless of the name of the recipient. [For instance you have no problem calling me Resident or OCCUPANT, now do you?]"

mystic one · #7 10-31-2006, 08:20 AM

A true bill---- sending them a bill for the cost of sending you mail.... ???Say to a suitor, if you continue sending me mail at this address with this name, you agree to pay me $50 dollar per letter.???? and do a proper refusal for cause on each letter that is not addressed to your properly. a properly executed notice to suitor of penalties associated with sending you unwanted mail, usually alievates the need to elevate actions to a formal complaint, as establishing evidence and associated penalties, usually makes advesaries, sweat?

In reference to the postmaster, you just want to leave a paper trail, and let the postmaster aware that you will be the sole screener and that you are not a resident. if the postmaster does not do his job, you will refusal for cause all mail, and give the postmaster a copy, so he is aware you are sole screener?

The issue of prepaid, are you refering to prepaid postage machines that people us vs. traditional stamps? regardless of how one sends mail to you, you can refusal any type of mail, prepaid, or postage paid.. wasnt sure what you really meant by notice of postage due. ??

David Merrill · #8 10-31-2006, 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mystic one

A true bill---- sending them a bill for the cost of sending you mail.... ???Say to a suitor, if you continue sending me mail at this address with this name, you agree to pay me $50 dollar per letter.???? and do a proper refusal for cause on each letter that is not addressed to your properly. a properly executed notice to suitor of penalties associated with sending you unwanted mail, usually alievates the need to elevate actions to a formal complaint, as establishing evidence and associated penalties, usually makes advesaries, sweat?

In reference to the postmaster, you just want to leave a paper trail, and let the postmaster aware that you will be the sole screener and that you are not a resident. if the postmaster does not do his job, you will refusal for cause all mail, and give the postmaster a copy, so he is aware you are sole screener?

The issue of prepaid, are you refering to prepaid postage machines that people us vs. traditional stamps? regardless of how one sends mail to you, you can refusal any type of mail, prepaid, or postage paid.. wasnt sure what you really meant by notice of postage due. ??

When you buy a stamp and stick it on the envelope in the proper amount of legal tender - that is prepaid too.

The true bill mentioned was the postage due. That's all. - A presentment from the postmaster.

If you want to form contracts by notice, fine. If they do not comply with common law, the postmaster's attorney will laugh and throw it away. Expect no change in behavior for your trouble. Therefore the contract(s) is already in place and you should know your side of obligations to perform. If a novation crops up, like a comment from the carrier to stop all mail to a recipient name you have screened, R4C immediately and appropriately. If you think the carrier might continue illegally anyway, then notify his superiors (postmaster) of the contract in place by law.

Regards,

David Merrill.

mystic one · #9 10-31-2006, 08:47 AM

Thank you david for your input, sums up things nice.
Will investigage this further.

mystic one · #10 10-31-2006, 09:02 AM

i think what your getting at is why bother to send a suitor a notice/warning of your penalties, when in the dmm manual there are already penalties in place by postmaster regulations. so what your saying is david, why waste time spinning your wheels on redudancy, when a suitor already has remed in common law. Furthermore, if the carrier doesnt do his job and allow you to screen mail piece by piece, you can do a refusal for cause on the novation that my crop up by the carrier, saying No, i dont not accept this novation, let me select the mail. So, essentially what your doing, is doing a refusal for cause on the suitor, and then a refusal for cause on the novation from the carrier. and all this established in evidence repository so that there is no question that you are not agreeing to be a "resident".... See, the thing is you dont want to just go in there "half ****ed", like hey postman dont send me any mail in this name.... Your wanting to establish evidence not only with the district court, but also with the post office as well that your not accepting certain mail.. that way when a magistrate reviews your misc. file. you have become court of comptent jurisdiction.

PS: If you wanted to be ****y, you could charge fees for each letter and cost of postage/ your refusals, as im sure you would like some extra money back for all your troubles. This extra notice, could just be used for more of less of collecting extra money from your judgement , perhaps?