When Plaintiff sues in lower Court while you sue that Plaintiff in the Supreme Court

[Sharing Lights]

Here it is - toilet style courtesy of:

Author Message
1) Nikki
Minstrel of the Mystical Moolooh


2) scooterdog223
Cannoneer


View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Nikki
Minstrel of the Mystical Moolooh





Joined: 23 Jul 2005
Posts: 535

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:12 pm Post subject: When the shoe's on the other foot

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SooeyHeads constantly proclaim "It's all about contracts," but when they are on the wrong side of a contract they start whining about their rights.

SharingLights, one of Sooey's most wordy posters (he seems to have a thesaurus plugged into what passes for his brain) is about to be evicted from his apartment in New York.

Although the building owner is acting completely within his rights according to the terms of the contract, IT'S NOT FAIR!

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/court/...eme-court.html

Back to top


CaptainKickback
LAmbasciatore de Latveria


Joined: 23 Feb 2006
Posts: 1607
Location: Directly above the center of the earth
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 5:33 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ah, but you forgot one important fact - it's New York City, which in regards to housing is a world unto itself.
_________________
The 82% Rule: 82% of the people in the world are total idiots, 13% have a vague idea of what is going on and 5% are truly aware.

Back to top


scooterdog223
Cannoneer



Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 77

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 10:20 pm Post subject: Re: When the shoe's on the other foot

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nikki wrote:
SooeyHeads constantly proclaim "It's all about contracts," but when they are on the wrong side of a contract they start whining about their rights.

SharingLights, one of Sooey's most wordy posters (he seems to have a thesaurus plugged into what passes for his brain) is about to be evicted from his apartment in New York.

Although the building owner is acting completely within his rights according to the terms of the contract, IT'S NOT FAIR!

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/court/...eme-court.html


May be if SharingLights got off his/her computer, got a job, and paid his/her bills, he/she wouldn't be in this position.

Back to top


Nikki
Minstrel of the Mystical Moolooh



Joined: 23 Jul 2005
Posts: 535

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 10:56 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not really. His building was sold and the new owner decided to not renew the lease.

SharingADimLight just can't understand that, once his lease term is up, he has no inherent, inalienable right to a new lease.

Instead, he is forcing an eviction.

Back to top

==========================================


When you mix such pearls of wisdom of bored duo of
Minstrel of the Mystical Moolooh
and
scooterdog
Cannoneer


you may get BS or Cow's S on scooter:

[Sharing Lights]

To likes of whom their sympathy goes.
Just view-read the vibes as they are so self-evident...



One of the board members.

Oh, lord, the losers guess and guess and debate and debate if only knew on what?


THE OWNER IS THE SAME, you losers, the Lease remains the same.

Mitchell Lama is not the name of the owner - it is the name of the program!

Jesus, when stupid is getting more stupid and advances theories as prima facie - that's really, really pathetic.

You defenders of burglars and embezzlers of tax-payers monies, have you read my contract once?

Where?

I never posted the contract!

Is it your best evidence of integrity to post crap that some one does not pay bills
when not once that was the issue?
Is that your best argument: to lie and write junk without substance?

Two of you wrapped in sh.... color quoted on top remind me of the reflection of your vibes below:

Author Message
1) Nikki
Minstrel of the Mystical Moolooh


2) scooterdog223
Cannoneer

Or you utilized your toilet, psychic line to see it in that reflection?


Don't you feel stupid by posting your guesses and toilet gasses as evidence?


PS. I am sure that quatloos may have decent members.
I am not vs any of those individuals as all human beings
deserve respect.

Yet, I would expose any barking fly as these two enveloped in their s... of BS as if they truly know what is going on so far away.

Exposing these flies is the best remedy as may the facts speak for themselves.



You, dog on scooter or fly on your s... are really who you are.
You cried to me late at night begging for help before you were banned
to speak on your behalf.

You know well that I am for freedom of expression and defend such rights for all.
Even when low crap is written vs me personally, I would accurately post all of it, without any censorship.
I obey morals and rules.


You begged for help, and now, after found home in your new "dun" - write trash on
others should or not getting a job and paying bills.

How the hell you, low life, know who works, pays, and who doesn't?


If you had any common sense, you would have known the spirit of those who write here and whether they work or beg.

Author Message
1) Nikki
Minstrel of the Mystical Moolooh


2) scooterdog223
Cannoneer

You are a barking fly indeed in my opinion, beggar and loser, "cannoner or sh.toneer"


Nikki, while you change your names, your spite remains the same,
Minstrel of the Mystical Moolooh
or maybe minion of pisstical foolah

[Sharing Lights]

scooterdog223 did amend his bad behavior.

Nikky only defended her wrong more and more.

It takes some character to admit being wrong.

I takes none - to defend that wrong.

I confronted the defamation and libel directly at the source.


I was met mostly by individuals who have not passed their evolution yet and act
as Orks, from the Lord of the RIngs, to say the least.

They do not even defend their wrong by merit - they shower piles of feces in form
of lies and insults and only.


Apparently they do not have the facilities to comprehend that they,
only, degrade themselves - not me.

To each - his won.


The posts may have certain value to those who need to defend vs. defamation and libel on-line.


http://quatloos.com/qforum/viewforum.php?f=11

The original thread disappeared.

[Sharing Lights]

Does any one know under which names
Henry Bowman and B Rookard hide at Quatloos?


Request:

not to call their Website, anymore, derogatory names as then, they claim to be justified to call us silly terms.

Let us act nobly - may they do what please.

I would expose who is who there by their, own conduct.

They still believe that when they gang on me, that makes any difference to me.

So naive.

Few of them did claim being banned from here without a warning.


It is not easy to know where the truth is.

However, Moderators, please give all a fair chance if such is not adequate.

If it is, I can't say much on what do not have adequate data.


Just please be fair to all sides.

Let us be an example and only.

[nydeemarie]

Perhaps something in here might help?

it did address conflicts in security interests.. courts... co-op.. etc..

http://www.lawrevision.state.ny.us/r...rt9_revise.pdf

[Sharing Lights]

Originally Posted by nydeemarie

Perhaps something in here might help?

it did address conflicts in security interests.. courts... co-op.. etc..

http://www.lawrevision.state.ny.us/r...rt9_revise.pdf

It is a great link.
Thank you friend!

[nydeemarie]

You are welcome.. I am glad it may help.. Here are some others I came across...

http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/RPL/rpltoc.html

http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/RPAPL/rpapltoc.html

http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/MDL/mdltoc.html

http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/HMC/hmctoc.html

http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/Pubofc/puboftoc.html

http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/Opengov/opengov.html

http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/SAPA/sapatoc.html

[Sharing Lights]

Originally Posted by nydeemarie

You are welcome.. I am glad it may help.. Here are some others I came across...

http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/RPL/rpltoc.html

http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/RPAPL/rpapltoc.html

http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/MDL/mdltoc.html

http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/HMC/hmctoc.html

http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/Pubofc/puboftoc.html

http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/Opengov/opengov.html

http://www.tenant.net/Other_Laws/SAPA/sapatoc.html

1. I did come across that link a while back, but, you did truly a quality job as posted the precise and detailed links.

2. I did overlook few earlier.

3. By following your links, I saw something that's of value now.

Conclusion:


It is always to ones' advantage to have an opened mind.

By following the links, 1. was achieved.

- Joined efforts combined in one direction are always superior to disharmony and spoiled brat like spite I encounter at
http://quatloos.com/qforum/viewforum.php?f=11

- Whose ways are better, is a naive question,


Thank you again.

Met with kindness, I return back even more when can.
Met with lies and deceit, I oppose firmly till the adversary realizes, "can't say - it's not enough..."
(:

[JACEL26]

Please note following (which is my situation) and respond if you have any comment. Liz Halbert

It seems Arthur Weinstein is the ONLY person on earth with any answers, or who cares but how does one go about hiring him?!



Re. "Co op board-antix redux" Nov 2006 Doug Hedding. “True Gotham”

I will bet anyone London to a brick, I know the board about whom you are referring. I would like to know who it is. How can I find out?

Re."Winner" Jan 26, 2008

I would also DESPERATELY like to know the name of your attorney??? I been looking for the exact right person for many months to commence litigation against board who have done so many unconscionable things to me and others in the building (along with the complete assistant of the management company. Some illegal most just disgustingly unethical and its clear the entire building is completely intimidated by them as its like living under marshal law in there). We also have the luxury of paying a fortune for that privilege Its out of control and that board (or at least most of them - including and especially the president and vice president). Because not just I but all the shareholders deserve to have happiness and feel secure in their own homes and if necessary I am willing to do something about it despite warnings about how difficult it will be. It will be worth a try if nothing else so they will they will at least be forced to modify their actions.

Because they have gone unchallenged for so long they are increasingly arrogant and ****y, resulting in increasingly more sloppy explanations (if any) they give for their antics. This nearly drove me to an early grave but now I just record it and save it as more fodder for a suit as soon as I can find the right lawyer. BUT IT MUST BE THE EXACT RIGHT PERSON. PLEASE "WINNER" can you helP me? Please anyone can you help? Every real estate law firm Ive researched either spe******es in litigating AGAINST shareholders, or DEFENDING shareholders, I have found some who litigate against LANDLORDS but not one who has any literature about any shareholder litigation cases. Is this because its so rare? . Ive been searching in vain to find one lawyer who has the brass to even give an ear to my case (which because of this boards unceasing acts is only being strengthened by the minute). Its painfully obvious there is no money in defending anyone against a board or that lawyers don’t have the confidence to even want to know about it. I know when I find the right person there will be fireworks for this board!!!



Written By :"victims of board abuse" On September 11, 2008 1:31 PM

Re. "Anonymous by Choice" Feb 20, 2008

Are shareholders entitled to be privy to any pending or PAST litigation attempts/successes against boards or managing companies?

[Notorial dissent]

You don’t say what state and city you live in, but that is where you need to start. Coop’s are a very special type of corporation or association, depending upon your state law, but there will be a chapter specifically devoted to them and what they can and cannot do. Familiarize yourself with that, then check and see if your city has any embellishments of their own. They will, however, be required to maintain a set of books, available for the members to view at convenient times, they are required by law to provide financial information to the shareholders at least once a year, and as requested by the shareholders, and there are a good number of rules about what they can and cannot do. Get a copy of the Articles of Incorporation, and the current bylaws, they should have to provide them to any member who asks. Then you are going to have to find yourself a real estate attorney who specializes in that type of law and present your case, and you will need examples and detailed information so that he can proceed. You most likely have a valid point, but you will have to find someone who knows what they are doing to get them to toe the line. Above all, play nice, let your attorney get nasty if necessary.