Quashed Subpoenas

[PANICPASS]

I had previously requested discovery but didn't get any results,

If you sent your discovery (interrogatories, request for production of documents or request for admissions) to the opponent, and he did not respond within the 30 days allowed, you should have written a polite letter reminding him the discovery was due on ____ date, and if he doesn't respond by ______ date you are going to compel him with a Motion to Compel and Request for Sanctions.

P.S. Discovery is never filed with the court. Only motions to compel discovery are filed.

Joseph, Thanks for nothing. Your answers are as vague as the judge's when he was asked what authority he had to quash the subpoenas. You must be an attorney and hardened to injustices in the courts. Your profits depend on lawless courts. I am quite aware of my rights to discovery, a subpoena is but a form of discovery. Jeff

[PANICPASS]

I am quite aware of my rights to discovery, a subpoena is but a form of discovery.

Yeah, but there are no common law courts. They are commercial courts, designed for corporations/commercial entities, not human beings. The judge does not recognize human beings.

You are barking up the wrong tree if you persist in doing it your-way. Do it their-way, or the take highway - as the court will gladly show you.

jurisdictionary.com

[joseph sugarman]

Dear Panic Pass and Notorial Dissent,

You both have tried to offer assistance to the poster as did I. To one extent or another we have all wasted our time with someone who does not know what he is doing as is not willing to learn. He was looking for someone to do it for him.

He claims to know discovery, but presents no supporting evidence he knows anything but the word. Based on what he has written, I suspect he used subpoenas duces tecum directed at parties to the issue when he should have properly used interrogatories, production of documents and requests for admission.

He thanks me for nothing as my answers were as vague as those of the judges. He forgets he mentioned the judge provided no answers. He apparently is so devoid of legal knowledge he does not recognize the terms interlocutory appeal, relief, state statutes, rules of the court and local rules. These are not vague, legal terms.

He also does not comprehend the proper way to obtain reasoned responses from those here who do work in court is to provide the following information, which should be helpful, I hope, to others requesting aid.

Please provide the venue of the court; is it federal or state. If it is state, please tell us what state. Is the matter criminal or civil. If criminal, what crimes are complained of; with code or statute numbers. If civil are you the plaintiff or defendant/respondent. What is the nature of the matter. What has been filed in the case by either side. Can you download documents for us to read. (Anyone who has more to add to this list, please jump in.) These are the basics any of us researchers need to help you.

As for this instant poster, I will tell you what I know about Due Process vis-a-vis your instant case. When the court is finished with you it will have Processed all the Due Due out of you.

Joseph Sugarman, Self Styled Pro Se Litigator from Hell.

To all the Naysayers and others who doubt my methods and/or knowlege. I received notice yesterday that there has been a " Assignment of Judge ". In other words my persistence has payed off. Now I will have to discover the why's and where's of this happening If the judge has recused or been replaced for cause allows me to revisit some of the past discretions in my case. I am still open for suhhestions and advice for to proceed further. Jeff