Randy Lee Rebuts IRS

[Slavic38]

I 'm not sure if there are separate instructions, but here's the non statutory abaitment:

http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/abatement.html

also see:
Putting It Into Practice and


When They Bring You Unto The Magistrates

sections here:
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/assembly.html

[David Merrill]

Thanks!

I glanced and did not see that the abatement was in that document.

No matter how many pieces of paper you abate, always refer to them as abandoned paper in the singular. Abandoned paper refers to resigning the paperwork to you, due to their lack of ability to produce Lawful process in your venue. Abandonment makes it null and void. Attach all abandoned paper to the back of abatement before service, and always mark across each piece, 'Refused for cause without dishonor and with out recourse to Me.' (in upper and lower case).

and expressly put:

Your abandoned paper is invalid for Cause, and is herewith returned and the purported record is to be expurgated because it is irregular and unauthorized, based upon the following, to wit:

The R4C process has been slimmed down to include the daily mail as expeditious process of the US district courts. Randy Lee and gang went through the trouble of yanking down the mailbox and removing numbers from their homes etc. [Causing for instance, anybody coming to the Utilities counter in Colorado Springs without a bill must supply a SSN in order to even pay cash in arrears. - That sort of thing...]

Now imagine going through the Randy Lee process every time somebody issued you legal process through the mail? Ergo, one suitor has even streamlined the clerk instruction to a fraction of the cost (attached).


Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S.

P.S. Presuming OwnMaster not a visiting Quatloser;

[rottweiler]

The ultimate reason for putting the federal union on some people's ignore list is to re-establish government for the Glory of the Most High. Then the private foreign UN federal union aid workers lose the pretense that they are needed because there is no government.

There is also a way to have a address for the private security guards that like to presume everyone is under their jurisdiction. If you have a general post office set up in front of your home you have a address in the judicial district of tens and the federal union/postal service can not serve it. The general post office is the beginnings of de-jure government and the plan is to link up with others to create a route.

In the meantime it is a simple thing to get a postal department or use general delivery. When you want to settle with the utility companies make sure to use your own envelopes. The counters or offices are the private side and you want to avoid that.

The Randy Lee that the federal union was trying to serve no longer existed and he just went to their private court to help them fix their record.

Originally Posted by David Merrill

Randy Lee and gang went through the trouble of yanking down the mailbox and removing numbers from their homes etc. [Causing for instance, anybody coming to the Utilities counter in Colorado Springs without a bill must supply a SSN in order to even pay cash in arrears. - That sort of thing...]

Now imagine going through the Randy Lee process every time somebody issued you legal process through the mail? Ergo, one suitor has even streamlined the clerk instruction to a fraction of the cost (attached).


Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S.

[David Merrill]

I like that. If I get it correctly, Rottweiler is loosely associating the UPU's UN combinatorial mathematics in macrocosm to my putting Nikki on my Ignore List. That takes some deep insight into abstractive comparative models.

On my mind is how interactive so many different threads are. I know there is quite a bit of archived material on Universal Postal Union, including some treaties I came across in the Repository the other day to upload... With KarenM on my ignore list, the tendency to allow her to lead me and us off point, as she intentionally does, is abated.

Recently Fulltitle or Mrg or somebody posted to a couple of my old threads simply because the search engine was not dredging it up - to pull it "back to the top" - I presume meaning in the last few weeks' surfing History.

That too is my primary method of looking around for something interesting to read and discuss here at Suijuris. I am starting a thread where folks might share tips at finding tangential material, and using the search engine - using cross-referenced materials, mention problems they are having finding something, or uploading or downloading a particular subject or specific article...



Regards,

David Merrill.


Oh... Now I think I get it - something about the Front Page missing lately. No wonder people are relying so heavily on our History column.

Maybe after that is repaired we can open an tutoring forum on how to easily navigate on subject matter and tangential material?

[Slavic38]

Originally Posted by rottweiler

If you have a general post office set up in front of your home you have a address in the judicial district of tens and the federal union/postal service can not serve it. The general post office is the beginnings of de-jure government and the plan is to link up with others to create a route.

Please do elaborate on having a general post office set up in front of a home to have an address in the judicial district of tens, or please or link to instructions and further reading.

BTW, Post office was created before the seat of the government and the seat of the government of the United States was established as a general post office, under the direction of a postmaster general so the post office is unaffected by US Gov bankruptcy. :

http://www.commonlawvenue.net/main/M...20in%20the.doc

The Post_Office and Judicial Courts were established before the seat of the Government. On Thursday, Sept. 17, 1789 we find written, “Mr. Goodhue, for the committee appointed for the purpose, presented a bill to amend part of the Tonnage act, which was read the first time. The bill sent from the Senate, for the temporary establishment of the Post_Office, was read the second and third time, and passed. The bill for establishing the Judicial Courts . . . , for establishing the seat of government . . . ” 1[11] Other references to the Post Office support my theory of the founding forefather’s views:
POST OFFICE. A place where letters are received to be sent to the persons to whom they, are addressed.
2. The post office establishment of the United States, is of the greatest importance to the people and to the government. The constitution of the United States has invested congress with power to establish post offices and post roads. Art. 1, s. 8, n. 7.
3. By virtue of this constitutional authority, congress passed several laws anterior to the third day of March 1825, when an act, entitled "An act to reduce into one the several acts establishing and regulating the post office department," was passed. 3 Story, U. S. 1825. It is thereby enacted, 1. That there be established, the seat of the government of the United States, a general post office, under the direction of a postmaster general. 2[12]


We need to take notice where the commas are placed on that last sentence. “That there be established, the seat of the government of the United States, a general post office, under the direction of a postmaster general.” When I set off a clause with commas, I make sure that the sentence makes sense without that clause. Taking out the set-off clause, we read, . . . “the seat of the government of the United States under the direction of a postmaster general.”
The creation of the Post office occurs before the creation of the seat of the government, and is placed in authority over the seat of government. What is the effect of these legal techniques? The stated position of an object and the sequence of events play an important role in the Universal-Legal-Technology. The effect is that the Government’s later bankruptcies in 1859 and 1929 have no legal effect upon the solvent Post-Office. We can make a case that the formation of the Post-Office before the formation of the government’s operations is a stroke of dumb luck. Perhaps it is ingenious, since communication has a higher value than government itself. If any government fails, the people still have a need to communicate with one another to form a new government. And to this day, the Post-Office is still solvent and operational, ready to fulfill its duty to help the people in their communications; to set a new government should a complete break down of the existing governmental structures occur in the United States. Sounds like a very good back up plan.

[rottweiler]

Check your PM.

Originally Posted by Slavic38

Please do elaborate on having a general post office set up in front of a home to have an address in the judicial district of tens, or please or link to instructions and further reading.

BTW, Post office was created before the seat of the government and the seat of the government of the United States was established as a general post office, under the direction of a postmaster general so the post office is unaffected by US Gov bankruptcy. :

http://www.commonlawvenue.net/main/M...20in%20the.doc

The Post_Office and Judicial Courts were established before the seat of the Government. On Thursday, Sept. 17, 1789 we find written, “Mr. Goodhue, for the committee appointed for the purpose, presented a bill to amend part of the Tonnage act, which was read the first time. The bill sent from the Senate, for the temporary establishment of the Post_Office, was read the second and third time, and passed. The bill for establishing the Judicial Courts . . . , for establishing the seat of government . . . ” 1[11] Other references to the Post Office support my theory of the founding forefather’s views:
POST OFFICE. A place where letters are received to be sent to the persons to whom they, are addressed.
2. The post office establishment of the United States, is of the greatest importance to the people and to the government. The constitution of the United States has invested congress with power to establish post offices and post roads. Art. 1, s. 8, n. 7.
3. By virtue of this constitutional authority, congress passed several laws anterior to the third day of March 1825, when an act, entitled "An act to reduce into one the several acts establishing and regulating the post office department," was passed. 3 Story, U. S. 1825. It is thereby enacted, 1. That there be established, the seat of the government of the United States, a general post office, under the direction of a postmaster general. 2[12]


We need to take notice where the commas are placed on that last sentence. “That there be established, the seat of the government of the United States, a general post office, under the direction of a postmaster general.” When I set off a clause with commas, I make sure that the sentence makes sense without that clause. Taking out the set-off clause, we read, . . . “the seat of the government of the United States under the direction of a postmaster general.”
The creation of the Post office occurs before the creation of the seat of the government, and is placed in authority over the seat of government. What is the effect of these legal techniques? The stated position of an object and the sequence of events play an important role in the Universal-Legal-Technology. The effect is that the Government’s later bankruptcies in 1859 and 1929 have no legal effect upon the solvent Post-Office. We can make a case that the formation of the Post-Office before the formation of the government’s operations is a stroke of dumb luck. Perhaps it is ingenious, since communication has a higher value than government itself. If any government fails, the people still have a need to communicate with one another to form a new government. And to this day, the Post-Office is still solvent and operational, ready to fulfill its duty to help the people in their communications; to set a new government should a complete break down of the existing governmental structures occur in the United States. Sounds like a very good back up plan.

[David Merrill]

Great Post!

I have been saying that in context of the Seven Noachide Laws when Congress dismissed the Post Office from the proceedings in order to acknowledge the Seven Noachide Laws were the bedrock of civilized society.*

http://friends-n-family-research.inf...L_102-14_1.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...L_102-14_2.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...L_102-14_3.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...L_102-14_4.jpg


I have to remember that post is to be found in Randy Lee Rebuts IRS? My engineering skills are starting to annoy me about some kind of catagory system. The Search Engine seems to bring year-old treasures like that post above in a year to the forefront sometimes, and sometimes not.

Me, I am running down to get that snippet and put it in my disk under Post Office and maybe even duplicate it in Seven Noachide Laws. The Posting System is essential for executions of law. The whole concept of liening initially upon contract or after dispute and judgment depends upon recordation...

Stream of consciousness is great in chats but getting back to the valuable tidbits is a bit more difficult. The intellectual property compiled over time - like a Coffee Table Book of sorts. Basically grab all items of value related to a certain topic and compile them in a chapter for instance...


Just thinking out loud here...


Regards,

David Merrill.


* I think there may have been some debate here regarding Randy Lee's objections to custodianship of the Seven Noachide Laws by the Khazarian Elite calling themselves Jews which is of course where another thread wandered...

http://www.suijuris.net/forum/ucc/89...llings-19.html

[rottweiler]

In addition to the group I belong to that I sent to Slavic38 in a PM, here is one I just found that you both will find interesting.
http://groups.google.com/group/count...-office-in-law

[Akira-]

I downloaded some of the county notary's audio files about a year ago.

One of his first comments was that personam jurisdiction challenges were rarely successful, and not to waste your time trying.

My experiences in court suggest just the opposite.

I suggest caution.

[rottweiler]

Originally Posted by Akira-

I downloaded some of the county notary's audio files about a year ago.

One of his first comments was that personam jurisdiction challenges were rarely successful, and not to waste your time trying.

My experiences in court suggest just the opposite.

I suggest caution.

Thanks,

I don't believe in going to court unless carried there but if I was I would do the same as you. I would tell them the federal reserve account has been cancelled.

I was just googling today to prove that public notaries are private and county notaries were publick. That is how I found the group.