A Proposed Legal Strategy, Version One

heyday · #1 12-03-2007, 10:48 PM

Dane Metcalfe
....Aggrieved Accused

v._____Case No: BS-08-balogna

STATE OF OKLAHOMA
.....fictitious plaintiff

From personal dealings with the Pontotoc County Court Clerk I'm sure that I won't be able to file this heading without a fight. Most likely there are rules against me in the Oklahoma Rules of Criminal Procedure or Civil Procedure, whichever covers it. (Probably ih the Oklahoma Pleading Code, Title 12, Civil Procedure.)

I'll check on that.

Hopefully I can, under the code, at least file the above caption as same with positions reversed.

The situation will be a misdemeaner public intox. case in front of the Honorable Special Judge John David Miller , acting in and for the 22nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT in the DISTRICT COURT OF PONTOTOC COUNTY,STATE OF OKLAHOMA.

I'm not scared.

__________Background________

As a local attorney once (correctly) explained:

"Judge Miller never met a search warrant he didn't like."

It's a situation where the ends justify the means was a conclusion we were forced to agree upon. Anyone who read my NOTICE OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL I posted might recall how I used the traditional legal approach to show how Miller abused court discretion by binding over Mr. Allen at preliminary examination for 2 very serious drug charges and a bogus after former conviction gun charge. I think anyone must agree that this legal conclusion was proved beyond any reasonable argument.

What I never brought up for Mr, Allen, either by affidavit or notice were the following facts.

During the PH Miller used a large part of his time operating his personal computer, paying little attention to the procedings. By my own eyes I witnessed his startling "in your face" conduct when Mr. Allen was placed on the stand in front of his blind (literally) attorney. Miller immediately pulled out his cell phone and made a call so that he was preoccupied with conversation throughout Allen's testimony!!!

Business as usual.

Funny, seems like he would have known I wasn't witnissing the hearing just for simple amusement. But, then again, he wasn't aware that the defense attorney would depart this earth shortly thereafter, either.

Furthermore, anyone who read my affidavit posted under the url given for "Why they hate me down at the jail"might recall how Miller did not have my criminal complaint (misdemeanor information) when I went to initial arraignment by "camera court) for the utterly bogus charge of public intox. My gentle notice was due to the fact that he actually arraigned me upon charges that had not even been filed yet!

Business as usual.

Understand that it matters not whether a "spy" notifies the court of any planeed legal strategy or not, the cards will be equally stacked against me, once charges are filed. Untill then, I have the advantage because I have considerable leeway unknown to most local inhabitants.

Probably no one else has been released after refusing an OR Bond after having it explained to me that I "don't have a constitutional right to stay in jail. ;)

___________Strategy__________

First of all, I have the Ticketslayer Package.

I have downloaded the Clyde Hyde Default Course as presented here.

I plan to study and incorporate these into my overall defense as logic dictates, utilyzing any input I receive from here, if any.

I want to begin my strategy from the moment of arrest, if possible.

Example:

OFFICER: What is your name?

Me: (Without ID) I was told it is Dane Metcalfe, but that's just hearsay. ( Mary Croft) ;)

_______The Overall Case_______

Up to and including an appeal to the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals after Jury Trial. That would be after an allucation refusing to accept a sentence, of course.

I see no reason I can not juxtapose this as an overall strategy to use in felony drug cases.

The normal procedure here on a misdemeanor case is as follows:

Initial Arraignment, a (to be contested) plea of not guilty is/ probably will be entered by the court, and a future court date is set.

At the second date one either pleads guilty or a date for jury trial is established. I view this as comparable to going up for Formal Arraignment after a bind over at Preliminary Hearing upon a felony information.

If after whatever legal wranglings I endure I reach this point, if I have already ineffectively had proceding of a Plea In Abatement I will file a Motion To Quash which will gain me a court hearing guaranteed. We'll call it as the PH in a felony case.

Just musing, might this set the stage for a future Motion to Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim For Which Relief Can Be Granted?

Next Post: Some Rules of Criminal Procedure

And Then: I have a suprise.

To be continued....

heyday · #2 12-03-2007, 11:15 PM

Quick Note:

My strategy will not include perjury, so, at jury trial I must testify that I wasn't intoxicated. Any pleadings filed may or may not assert innocence.

For the record, that's clear.

Another quick point-

The court docket will be freely available at the site Oklahoma District Court Records.
Select Pontotoc County from the drop down menu, type in Metcalfe, Dane (or Metcalf, Dane) making sure to include the space after the comma will bring up the record.

heyday · #3 12-04-2007, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Dane Metcalfe
....Aggrieved Accused

v._____Case No: BS-08-balogna

STATE OF OKLAHOMA
.....fictitious plaintiff

From personal dealings with the Pontotoc County Court Clerk I'm sure that I won't be able to file this heading without a fight. Most likely there are rules against me in the Oklahoma Rules of Criminal Procedure or Civil Procedure, whichever covers it. (Probably ih the Oklahoma Pleading Code, Title 12, Civil Procedure.)

I'll check on that.

I didn't get much help from the Oklahoma Statutes:

Quote:

12 O.S.2007

A. PLEADINGS. There shall be a petition and an answer; a reply to a counterclaim denominated as such; an answer to a cross-claim, if the answer contains a cross-claim denominated as such; a third-party petition, if a person who was not an original party is summoned under the provisions of Section 14 of this act; and a third-party answer, if a third-party petition is served. No other pleading shall be allowed, except that the court may order a reply to an answer or a third-party answer.
B. MOTIONS AND OTHER PAPERS.
1. An application to the court for an order shall be by motion which, unless made during a hearing or trial, shall be made in writing, shall state with particularity the grounds therefor, and shall set forth the relief or order sought. The requirement of writing is fulfilled if the motion is stated in a written notice of the hearing of the motion.
2. The rules applicable to captions, signing, and other matters of form of pleadings apply to all motions and other papers provided for by this act.
3. All motions shall be signed in accordance with Section 11 of this act.
C. DEMURRERS TO THE PLEADINGS, PLEAS, ETC., ABOLISHED. Demurrers to the pleadings, pleas, and exceptions for insufficiency of a pleading shall not be used.

12 O.S. 2010

A. CAPTION; NAMES OF PARTIES. Every pleading shall contain a caption setting forth the name of the court, the title of the action, the file number, and a designation as in subsection A of Section 7 of this act. In the petition the title of the action shall include the names of all the parties, but in other pleadings it is sufficient to state the name of the first party on each side with an appropriate indication of other parties. In a third-party petition the title of the action shall include the names of the parties to the third-party action; a counterclaim and a cross-claim shall include the names of the claimants and the parties against whom the claim is asserted; and a motion and petition in intervention shall include the names of the intervenors and the adverse parties. When a party is suing or being sued in a representative capacity, this should be stated in the title of the action.
B. PARAGRAPHS; SEPARATE STATEMENTS. All averments of claim or defense shall be made in numbered paragraphs, the contents of each of which shall be limited as far as practicable to a statement of a single set of circumstances; and a paragraph may be referred to by number in all succeeding pleadings. Each claim founded upon a separate transaction or occurrence and each defense other than denials shall be stated in a separate count or defense whenever a separation facilitates the clear presentation of the matters set forth.
C. ADOPTION BY REFERENCE; EXHIBITS. Statements in a pleading may be adopted by reference in a different part of the same pleading or in another pleading or in any motion. A copy of any written instrument which is an exhibit to a pleading is a part thereof for all purposes.

Soooo, what does section 7 have to say? Who knows?

Quote:

Oklahoma Statutes Citationized
Title 12. Civil Procedure
Chapter 1 - Preliminary Provisions
Section 7 - Repealed by Laws 1984, SB 417, c. 164, § 32, eff. November 1, 1984

One other thing, off the top of my head, upon the procedural difference between the public intox and felony drug charge:

A demurr can only be used in a felony case.( One of the pleas allowed at Formal Arraignment)

TBC

heyday · #4 12-04-2007, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Dane Metcalfe
....Aggrieved Accused

v._____Case No: BS-08-balogna

STATE OF OKLAHOMA
.....fictitious plaintiff

So, the question remains, may I change the caption to read as quoted?

Anyone care to offer an opinion?

The Oklahoma Rules of Criminal Procedure relies upon the above Civil Rules for these matters.

heyday · #5 12-04-2007, 10:30 PM

08-04-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51750880 Aug 5 2004 9:59:58:390AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF FAULT - OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-04-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51750881 Aug 5 2004 10:00:08:280AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-04-2004 REQ - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51750948 Aug 5 2004 10:04:12:357AM - $ 0.00
REQUEST FOR THE BONA FIDES OF MARK BARCUS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-04-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51750955 Aug 5 2004 10:04:47:620AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-04-2004 AFD - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51750962 Aug 5 2004 10:05:23:997AM - $ 0.00
AFFIDAVIT OF FRANK ANTHONY TAUCHER REGARDING PHONE CONVERSATION WITH TROP B AND VISIT TO STOREY WRECKER SERVICE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-04-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51750985 Aug 5 2004 10:06:07:137AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF FAULT - OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-04-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51750990 Aug 5 2004 10:06:29:043AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF IMMEDIATE DUTY TO CORRECT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-05-2004 AFD - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51883475 Aug 6 2004 1:39:52:453PM - $ 0.00
AFFIDAVIT OF FRANK ANTHONY TAUCHER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-06-2004 AFD - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51893352 Aug 9 2004 11:04:35:160AM - $ 0.00
AFFIDAVIT OF FRANK ANTHONY TAUCHER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-12-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51950454 Aug 13 2004 9:51:06:177AM - $ 0.00
CHANGE OF SPECIAL APPEARANCE, NOTICE AND DEMURRE FOR LACK OF VENUE AND JURISDICTION TO SPECIAL APPEARANCE, NOTICE, OBJECTION AND PROTEST FOR LACK OF VENUE AND JURISDICTION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-12-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51950481 Aug 13 2004 9:51:35:817AM - $ 0.00
DEMAND FOR COURT OF RECORD AND DEMAND FOR BONA FIDES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-12-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51950505 Aug 13 2004 9:52:16:380AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF DECLARATION OF MIXED WAR, NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS, NOTICE OF DUTY TO CORRECT AND SHOW CAUSE ORDER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-16-2004 CTARRPA - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51969615 Aug 16 2004 3:53:17:873PM - $ 0.00
JUDGE SARAH SMITH: DEFENDANT PRESENT. ARRAIGNMENT PASSED TO 8-30-2004 9;30 AM. DEFENDANT RECOGNIZED BACK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-16-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51974835 Aug 17 2004 11:21:40:460AM - $ 0.00
AUGUST 16, 2004 REFUSAL FOR CAUSE, BY AFFADAVIT, OF JULY 26, 2004M MINUTE ORDER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-16-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51974860 Aug 17 2004 11:22:55:240AM - $ 0.00
AUGUST 16, 2004 REFUSAL FOR CAUSE, BY AFFADAVIT, OF JULY 4, 2004 PROBABLE CAUSE HEARING AND FINDING
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-17-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51971513 Aug 17 2004 8:51:58:747AM - $ 0.00
CASE FILE EXPANDED VOLUME II
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-17-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 51972075 Aug 17 2004 9:14:07:743AM - $ 0.00
CASE FILE EXPANDED VOLUME 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-26-2004 LT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52220555 Aug 27 2004 9:24:31:997AM - $ 0.00
LETTER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-26-2004 AFD - 52226178 Aug 27 2004 2:23:22:610PM - $ 0.00
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-30-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52243184 Aug 31 2004 11:15:17:407AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-30-2004 WOM - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52243260 Aug 31 2004 11:16:57:780AM - $ 0.00
EX PARTE WRIT OF MANDAMUS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-30-2004 CTPASS - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52247744 Aug 31 2004 3:05:54:780PM - $ 0.00
BARCUS, MARK: DEFENDANT PRESENT, NOT IN CUSTODY AND NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. STATE REPRESENTED. MOTION HEARINGS SET ON 9/23/04 AT 2:30 PM IN ROOM 173. BOND TO REMAIN; DEFENDANT RECOGNIZED BACK.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-31-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52256768 Sep 1 2004 1:54:50:293PM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF FAULT - OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-31-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52256806 Sep 1 2004 1:55:38:213PM - $ 0.00
FAX COPY OF - NOTICE OF FAULT - OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

08-31-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52256808 Sep 1 2004 1:55:53:947PM - $ 0.00
FAX COPY OF - NOTICE OF DEFAULT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-17-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52397087 Sep 20 2004 11:53:27:317AM - $ 0.00
AUGUST 31, 2004 REFUSAL FOR CAUSE, BY AFFIDAVIT, OF AUGUST 30, 2004 MINUTE ORDER.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-20-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52409257 Sep 21 2004 12:00:46:423PM - $ 0.00
EX PARTE WRIT OF ERROR, EX PARTE WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND NOTICE OF MINISTERIAL DUTY; OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEMAND FOR VENUE AND JURISDICTIONAL DECLARATORY JUDGMENT.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-21-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52417846 Sep 22 2004 9:59:52:033AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT TO CONSTRUE BRIEFS LIBERALLY, OBJECTION AND PROTEST
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-21-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52417861 Sep 22 2004 10:00:33:597AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF FAULT - OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-22-2004 AFD - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52428504 Sep 23 2004 9:36:39:800AM - $ 0.00
AFFIDAVIT OF CORRESPONDENCE WITH SALLY HOWE SMITH, TULSA COURT CLERK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-22-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52428534 Sep 23 2004 9:39:16:110AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND AFFIDAVIT OF DEFAULT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-23-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52438695 Sep 24 2004 9:26:51:157AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE, OBJECTION AND PROTEST REGARDING FICTION AND STATE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-23-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52438797 Sep 24 2004 9:30:19:327AM - $ 0.00
ORAL STATEMENT ON SEPTEMBER 23, 2004 IN ROOM 173, TULSA COUNTY COURTHOUSE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-23-2004 CTFREE - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52467646 Sep 28 2004 1:53:46:453PM - $ 0.00
CRUTCHFIELD DARLENE: CASE PASSED FOR DECISION 10/1/2004 @ 11 AM ROOM 124.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-29-2004 LT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52484364 Sep 30 2004 9:21:16:820AM - $ 0.00
LETTER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

heyday · #6 12-04-2007, 10:33 PM

09-29-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52484377 Sep 30 2004 9:21:46:680AM - $ 0.00
EX PARTE WRIT OF ERROR AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-29-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52484441 Sep 30 2004 9:23:21:273AM - $ 0.00
OBJECTION REGARDING THE FAILURE OF FRANK ANTHONY TAUCHER TO REFER TO "BARCUS" AS "JUDGE BARCUS" AT THE SEPTEMBER 23, 2004 HEARING
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-29-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52484456 Sep 30 2004 9:23:39:053AM - $ 0.00
OBJECTION REGARDING ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-29-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52484485 Sep 30 2004 9:24:20:960AM - $ 0.00
OBJECTION AND PROTEST REGARDING ANY DECISION ADVERSE TO THE PRIVATE AFFAIRS OF FRANK ANTHONY TAUCHER FROM OTHER THAN TRIAL BY JURY OF PEERS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-29-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52484515 Sep 30 2004 9:24:40:490AM - $ 0.00
OBJECTION AND PROTEST REGARDING TAPE RECORDINGS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-29-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52484521 Sep 30 2004 9:25:01:320AM - $ 0.00
OBJECTION, PROTEST, MEMORANDUM OF LAW AND AFFIDAVIT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-29-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52484565 Sep 30 2004 9:26:25:863AM - $ 0.00
OBJECTION, PROTEST AND NOTICE REGARDING ATTEMPT BY DARLENE CRUTCHFIELD, DON BAKER AND STATE OF OKLAHOMA AT SEPTEMBER 23, 2004 HEARING TO CONVERT THE STATUS OF FRANK ANTHONY TAUCHER TO PRO SE VIA EXERCISE OF UNAUTHORIZED DOMINION AND CONTROL; AND DUTY TO CORRECT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-30-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52495421 Oct 1 2004 9:51:52:457AM - $ 0.00
SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 REFUSAL FOR CAUSE, BY AFFIDAVIT, OF SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 MINUTE ORDER.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-30-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52495469 Oct 1 2004 9:53:35:500AM - $ 0.00
SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 REFUSAL FOR CAUSE, BY AFFIDAVIT, OF SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 MINUTE ORDER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-30-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52495482 Oct 1 2004 9:53:58:860AM - $ 0.00
SEPTEMBER 24, 2004 AFFIDAVIT OF FRANK ANTHONY TAUCHER REGARDING ATTENDENCE OF LES HENDREN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-30-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52495485 Oct 1 2004 9:54:12:937AM - $ 0.00
NEGATIVE AVERMENT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-30-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52495492 Oct 1 2004 9:54:33:030AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OF LIMITED CONTEST
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-30-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52495496 Oct 1 2004 9:54:45:360AM - $ 0.00
OBJECTION REGARDING CONFLICT OF INTEREST
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-30-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52495509 Oct 1 2004 9:55:07:657AM - $ 0.00
ORAL STATEMENT FOR OCTOBER 1, 2004 IN ROOM 124, TULSA COUNTY COURTHOUSE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-30-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52495511 Oct 1 2004 9:55:20:703AM - $ 0.00
OBJECTION REGARDING RIGHT TO BE HEARD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

09-30-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52495631 Oct 1 2004 10:01:19:383AM - $ 0.00
OBJECTION AND NOTICE REGARDING DE FACTO OFFICER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

10-01-2004 CTFREE - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52510360 Oct 4 2004 11:39:37:003AM - $ 0.00
CRUTCHFIELD DARLENE: DFT PRESENT AND PRO SE. DON BAKER FOR THE STATE. DECISION PASSED TO 12/1/2004 @ 9 AM. DFT RECOGNIZED BACK. BOND REMAINS.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-12-2004 AFD - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52827630 Nov 15 2004 9:31:20:033AM - $ 0.00
AFFIDAVIT OF FRANK ANTHONY TAUCHER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-12-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52827659 Nov 15 2004 9:32:07:097AM - $ 0.00
REFUSAL FOR CAUSE, BY AFFIDAVIT OF OCTOBER 4, 2004 MINUTE ORDER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-12-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52827690 Nov 15 2004 9:33:02:737AM - $ 0.00
OBJECTION, NOTICE OF LAWFUL PROTEST AND NOTICE REGARDING PROPER ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS AND RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY OF PEERS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-12-2004 AFD - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52827692 Nov 15 2004 9:33:23:470AM - $ 0.00
AFFIDAVIT AND NOTICE OF CONTIUANCE OF RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-12-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52827711 Nov 15 2004 9:33:47:110AM - $ 0.00
SECOND AFFIDAVIT OF NEGATIVE AVERMENT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-12-2004 TEXT - 52827741 Nov 15 2004 9:34:24:390AM - $ 0.00
EX PARTE WRIT OF ERROR, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, NOTICE OF DUTY TO CORRECT AND PREVENT INJURY, AND NOTICE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-12-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52827829 Nov 15 2004 9:35:55:843AM - $ 0.00
OBJECTION AND PROTEST BY AFFIDAVIT OF OCTOBER 1, 2004 PRETEND REVIEW BY JUDGE IMPERSONATOR DARLENE CRUTCHFIELD OF FRANK ANTHONY TAUCHER'S CHALLENGES TO VENUE AND PERSONAM AND SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND NOTICE OF DUTY TO CORRECT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-15-2004 PWHC - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52840670 Nov 16 2004 9:17:06:900AM - $ 0.00
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-17-2004 PWHC - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52861964 Nov 18 2004 8:26:56:960AM - $ 0.00
COPY OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-19-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52887138 Nov 22 2004 9:26:12:483AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF DISHONOR AND FAULT - OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-24-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52924018 Nov 29 2004 10:32:48:167AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF WRITS TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-24-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52924069 Nov 29 2004 10:33:35:997AM - $ 0.00
NEGATIVE AVERMENT REGARDING ABSENCE OF PEOPLE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-24-2004 NO - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52924082 Nov 29 2004 10:33:53:150AM - $ 0.00
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-24-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52924087 Nov 29 2004 10:34:24:073AM - $ 0.00
NEGATIVE AVERMENT REGARDING ALLEGED CHARGES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-24-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52924104 Nov 29 2004 10:35:08:667AM - $ 0.00
NEGATIVE AVERMENT AND NOTICE REGARDING CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11-24-2004 TEXT - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52924120 Nov 29 2004 10:35:44:790AM - $ 0.00
NEGATIVE AVERMENT AND NOTICE REGARDING IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

12-01-2004 DISMISSED 1 TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 52980782 Dec 3 2004 4:53:02:430PM - $ 0.00
JUDGE DARLENE CRUTCHFIELD: DEFENDANT PRESENT PROSE. STATE REPRESENTED BY LATISHA HARPER FOR MARNEY KAWANO. CASE CALLED, CASE DISMISSED COST TO STATE. BOND EXONERATED.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

01-26-2005 ABST 1 TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 53365835 Jan 26 2005 2:03:44:493PM - $ 0.00
ABSTRACT SENT TO D.P.S.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

01-26-2005 ABST 3 TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 53365859 Jan 26 2005 2:03:44:493PM - $ 0.00
ABSTRACT SENT TO D.P.S.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

01-26-2005 ABST 2 TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 53366702 Jan 26 2005 2:03:44:493PM - $ 0.00
ABSTRACT SENT TO D.P.S.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

01-26-2005 ABST 4 TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 53367343 Jan 26 2005 2:03:44:493PM - $ 0.00
ABSTRACT SENT TO D.P.S.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

12-05-2005 CTFREE - TAUCHER, FRANK ANTHONY 56939702 Dec 5 2005 4:39:32:927PM - $ 0.00
DAVID YOULL: COURT OVERRULED , EXPERTE WRIT OF ERROR REGARDING 20041205 MINUTES ORDER AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO COMPLE CLERK TO PERFORM MISISTERIAL DUTY.

SEE: http://www.oscn.net/applications/oci...20587&db=Tulsa

heyday · #7 12-04-2007, 10:34 PM

I have all these pleadings

heyday · #8 12-04-2007, 10:39 PM

Look what they did after they dismissed it-

they refiled it and issued an arrest warrant in 2005, but, they won't arrest him.

Business as usual in Oklahoma...

http://www.oscn.net/applications/oci...87357&db=Tulsa

heyday · #9 12-05-2007, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Objection Regarding the Failure of Frank Anthony Taucher to Refer to “BARCUS” as “JUDGE BARCUS” at the September 23, 2004 Hearing

During the September 23, 2004 Hearing, DARLENE CRUTCHFIELD commanded that I call BARCUS “JUDGE BARCUS” when I referred to BARCUS as BARCUS. I conditionally agree to refer to BARCUS as "JUDGE BARCUS" upon proof of claim entered into the instant court file by 05:00 p.m. Thursday, September 30, 2004:

that the bona fides of MARK BARCUS, including said person’s Oath of Office, Bond, Attorney’s Oath, License to Practice Law, and Appointment Certificate authorizing BARCUS to be called Judge BARCUS were duly filed with the Tulsa County Clerk prior to My Good Faith request for production and same from the Tulsa County Clerk;

that in the absence of said original documents being filed, I would not be engaging in false witness by publicly stating that BARCUS is a judge while having knowledge that BARCUS has not met the qualifications for office as a judge;

that the venue and personam and subject matter jurisdictional challenges I have mounted to the contrary in the instant proceeding have been controverted by written affidavit based on first hand knowledge and sworn under penalty of perjury by a qualified officer;
that such requirement in favor of BARCUS does not result in a Title of Nobility prohibited by the Constitution for the United States of America, anno Domini 1787; and
that such requirement does not infringe My Unalienable Right to Free Speech, Right of Open Access to the Courts and Right to Petition Government for Redress of Grievances.

I bet "judge" Barcus was smokin'

heyday · #10 12-07-2007, 04:05 AM

A Fatal Flaw

Upon due consideration and review, my scheme is fatally flawed from it's inception.

Damages.

Technically the store owner could be said to suffer an injury to his business due to interference with his customers.

While not a practical claim it still removes any moral edge that I planned on standing upon.

I might start a different legal project and attempt to develop a full blown drug defense but I doubt I'll volunteer to try it out by manipulating an arrest, lmao.