Court Discuss the tactics used by the court system, and how to develop your counter-tactics for success in the courtroom, dealing with citations, criminal and civil matters.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Court
The "gun ownership" case before the Supreme Court The "gun ownership" case before the Supreme Court
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-06-2007, 05:48 PM
drewenterprises drewenterprises is offline
Waking Up
  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 15
The "gun ownership" case before the Supreme Court
This is from an email I have received from Harmon L. Taylor. The "gun ownership" case before the Supreme Court.pdf
He has posted it here also:
http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussi...2;title=AP FN

Edit: Tried to make a better quality pdf, it does not appear to have worked.
Last edited by drewenterprises : 12-06-2007 at 09:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2007, 11:13 PM
ezrhythm ezrhythm is offline
Come and Get Some!
  
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,216
Send a message via AIM to ezrhythm Send a message via Yahoo to ezrhythm
Great article. Excellent points made.
__________________

Any fool can hire an attorney. It takes a touch of genius-and a lot of courage-to move in the opposite direction.

Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, following the tradition of men according to the rudiments of the world, and not in accordance with Christ.

To view other forums or create a new thread; While viewing any thread scroll down to the bottom right hand side. Select from Forum Jump.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2007, 11:19 PM
Ownmaster's Avatar
Ownmaster Ownmaster is offline
Banned User
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 363
The first thing I read is that we are not allowed to carry guns in cars with out a license.

Not true in California. One is just not allowed to carried a concealed weapon.

I have been pulled over many times with my pistol on the dash and never once was arrested for it.

Although once I did get charged for carrying a concealed in my glove box.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-06-2007, 11:23 PM
Ownmaster's Avatar
Ownmaster Ownmaster is offline
Banned User
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 363
Quote:
We voluntarily sign the documents that create the trust.

I wish an example was given. But none were. That right there is probably the most important part of the whole paper and it is just glossed over as understood fact.

That whole paper smells of stink.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-06-2007, 11:25 PM
Ownmaster's Avatar
Ownmaster Ownmaster is offline
Banned User
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 363
I love the legal argument

"There is no way 'Funny Money' can exist in any system other than a purely meritime system".

Now this guy is going to expand on this right. Provide some insight to support this claim? Nope.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-06-2007, 11:31 PM
Ownmaster's Avatar
Ownmaster Ownmaster is offline
Banned User
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 363
The ultimate idiot statement...

Quote:
(Emphasis added)

So no, it is not fraud.
...
To argue fraud is to put the responsibility of fixing this on to the scammers

Well according to almost any dictionary...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yourdictionary.com
(Emphasis added)

http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache...lnk&cd=4&gl=us

scam (skam)

noun

Slang a swindle or fraud; esp. a confidence game

So this guy says it is not a fraud and then calls them frauds...

This paper sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-06-2007, 11:34 PM
Ownmaster's Avatar
Ownmaster Ownmaster is offline
Banned User
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 363
Quote:
Now given that the registered car is trust property.

Sure, now just give the unproven, unsupported assumption the level of "given".

Why not?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-06-2007, 11:37 PM
Ownmaster's Avatar
Ownmaster Ownmaster is offline
Banned User
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 363
This guy is going to get it handed to him. The court at best will toy with him by giving a cryptic ruling in hope future wins (If he just does it right ;)... der)
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone please post or link full case "lost at C" phreeman2003 Court 50 06-26-2008 04:44 PM
"SOVEREIGN", "PERSON", "ENTITY" or "INDIVIDUAL"? Bulletproof Monk Citizenship & Jurisdiction 34 03-15-2008 12:07 PM
"free and clear ownership" before land patent? dave b Land Ownership 34 01-22-2008 01:46 PM
American National" Sues All Nine Supreme Court Justice TKL Citizenship & Jurisdiction 0 10-14-2007 02:05 AM
"Petition for Writ of Mandamus" to the Florida Supreme Court iamfreeru2 Court 7 08-02-2005 01:13 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:07 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer