Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ownmaster
Is the notion you espouse that a man is his own court of competent jurisdiction based on the Magna Charta's recognition that no man shall be deprived of his court?
Have you read Bob Thorton's research?
|
For one thing I think you mean William Thornton?
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...m_Thornton.wmv
He had some interesting things to say alright but it all falls by the wayside trying to import it to a
de facto State of XXXXX from a
de jure state. With that in mind we continued for a few hours more since we leased out the entire weekend for his lecture. However he spent quite a time on his Bicycle Helmet Case and then I pointed out that the case was over ten years old and all he had to go on was that the original judge moved away. His prize cause for examining court of record had been going for over ten years and gotten nowhere to this day.
I suppose you will continue assembling another faulty construction you are trying to put in my mouth. Something to the effect that having a court of competent jurisdiction stands upon the 1215 Magna Charta?
That of course would mean that prior to 1215 there were no courts of competent jurisdiction; faulty Codee:
Quote:
Dan 6:5 Then said these men, We shall not find any occasion against this Daniel, except we find it against him concerning the law of his God.
Dan 6:6 Then these presidents and princes assembled together to the king, and said thus unto him, King Darius, live forever.
Dan 6:7 All the presidents of the kingdom, the governors, and the princes, the counselors, and the captains, have consulted together to establish a royal statute, and to make a firm decree, that whosoever shall ask a petition of any God or man for thirty days, save of thee, O king, he shall be cast into the den of lions.
|
And who to know how to hold court better than the chieftain of the sorcerers and astrologers of ancient Babylon?
Quote:
Dan 6:21 Then said Daniel unto the king, O king, live forever.
Dan 6:22 My God hath sent his angel, and hath shut the lions' mouths, that they have not hurt me: forasmuch as before him innocency was found in me; and also before thee, O king, have I done no hurt.
|
And with your Ebsworth and Ebsworth admiralty inheritance you might as well keep to statute where no corpus dilecti is ever required. Where the pretended offense to the corporate seal's peace and dignity allegedly being offended is enough to jail you. But I think you trying to confuse people around here should be enough to get you banished again.
Regards,
David Merrill.
P.S. Daniel holding court:
(image attached)
