Who has the Balls?

Ok, Ok. lets say u have a contract with a judge or other public official and in that contract, that judge pledges his property if he executes the contract by violating something in your contract. Who out there has the balls to do a bill of sale on that judges property or otherwise depose of it using article 9 of the ucc? let me answer it for myself first. depends on the situation, right now im about 35 percent willing to do it. just being honest, but its taking the equity, something we have to do. i want honest answers to this.

[weishaupt1776]

[color=black][b]Since I am happily married with NO wife, kids, or pets, I am in a position where I would be comfortable doing it. The only thing holding me back is an airtight case, knowledge, theory, and the application of all of it. In other words, I have more balls than brains in regards to an issue like this. I definitely agree we need to go after their property the same way they go after ours for a remedy.

[EnSabahNur]

Are you kidding me. If I have NOT hurt someone or damaged their property, where do I sign...I don't care what they try to bring against me. I cannot stand these self-righteous black robed whores, and my life would be more complete after taking a few down a notch.



I would take his car, and then put signs on it about how I got it, and who from, and then drive it around town, and down the neigborhood that judge lives in, past his house, while shouting through a loud speaker.

weishupt. its simple. the airtight case is the fact that the government cannot be a damaged party in ANY SUIT. it has to be a flesh and blood man. lets say u get a speeding ticket. the county or city or whoever is bringing the suit. there will be a district attorney, a cop, and a judge against you. u write up a 10 day contract by commercial affidavit and tell them they got 10 days to produce a flesh and blood damaged party and they agree that if they do not and prosecute u under color of law, then they pledge everything they got. send them out a notice of default after 10 days and file it into the case. thats a simple scenario. u will put a true bill in the contract (damages). then, they execute the contract by prosecuting u.

[weishaupt1776]

[color=black][b]I'm beginning to see the light. If I am getting this right, I am setting a new contract by affidavit giving 'em notice of potential default w/time limit at their expense of forfeiting property. They prosecute me & don't rebut my affidavit, therefore agreeing to pledge their property to me and I default them. So this is what you mean by "contracting them". As far as using Article 9, I am leery of because it's their code & I am not too thrilled about filling out one of "their" forms, either. Pretty awesome stuff, though. I would love to attack their equity since their is no remedy & no law anymore. It seems like the only remedy besides that is to keep filing writs until they get sick of you & drop it.



I'm seriously thinking about doing this to the Deputy that pulled me over. The thing is is entering in a common law default into the record and then maybe publishing a public notice in the paper that the dude has forfeited his property.

[KaosTheory]

Harford Van Dyke apparently has the balls......



http://www.fourwinds10.com/news/05-g...-jeopardy.html

the ONLY reason i suggested using article 9 is so that u have THEIR code to fall on. in other words, the ucc is supposed to incorporate common law, forgot the article thays says that, so, if u take their property or use a contract, reference the common law and the ucc. that way they cannot fool a jury into fraud.

[weishaupt1776]

[b]It seems like these people are on the EXTREME fringe and isn't necessarily the same method. I believe that KG is referring to setting them up w/ a contract.His approach seems reasonable, but way on the edge.

AND THIS MAN DEFINITELY HAS THE COURAGE ALSO. I CANT BELIEVE I MISSED THIS BEFORE. SCRIPT TO ARREST A JUDGE

TESTIMONY - TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS HEARING: JUDGE AVERA - SEPTEMBER 30, 1999



I wish to make a statement.

Please, tell me this. Is this a court? Thank you.

Is this a court of record? Thank you.

Are you a judge? Thank you very much.



For the record, since this is a court of record and you are a judge, I wish to report a felony. If I don't, I shall be subject to fines and imprisonment under federal laws. Under Title 18, USC, Sec 4, I wish to report to the court that you, sir, have committed trespass of treason to the Constitution, by you denying us access to said Constitutions, denying us the rights protected by the Constitutions Article 3, Section 3, clause 1.



You are guilty of Depriving a free, white man, State Citizen of Constitutional Rights of ORIGINAL Article 7 of the Oregon Constitution; where "…in all controversies a trial by jury shall be preserved,"

By obstructing justice with bias and prejudice to protect yourself, the STATE OF OREGON and fellow bar members from criminal exposure;





By failing to protect a child while being kept in unlawful STATE incarceration, criminally abusing, aiding and abetting child sexual abuse and conspiring with other STATE OF OREGON agents and authorities to destroy my daughter and my family;





By conducting a court of unknown unconstitutional jurisdiction, using Statutes against a free, innocent State Citizen; By using unconstitutional 419 "juvenile code" statutes to deprive me of my inviolate rights.



You cannot regulate a human being.





By conducting a court, to quote you, "You are in juvenile court. There are no charges. There are no defendants. There are no juries," and to proceed against an actual parent, and sever the natural bond of the family body, having never charged me with a crime or convicted me of a crime, is an unconscionable violation of my due process of Law.





Your authority for this proceeding does not exist.





By allowing the STATE to prevail with complete disregard for undisputed court testimony--sworn confessions and a jury verdict. You are, along with other judges, committing fraud and treason in open court against the Citizens of the State of Oregon, as well as my daughter and myself.





By using hearsay and previously discredited reports and witnesses whose lies were dismissed in open court in November, 1996, when the case was exposed as lies and fraud, and the original petitions were dismissed.



By refusing to uphold subpoenas of critical adverse witnesses to be cross-examined, even quashing the subpoena of Dep. District Attorney William Howell, whose fraudulent, malicious, discredited, dismissed petitions have been holding Melissa for three years unlawfully.





You have refused to uphold your oath to the Constitution and have intentionally and maliciously deprived me of fundamental rights and liberties, guaranteed by the Constitution, to be free from excessive government intervention and criminal STATE abuse.





By refusing to answer all questions as to venue and jurisdiction. I cannot defend myself if I do not know what venue and jurisdiction I am in, and you refuse to make this clear to me. Jurisdiction has been challenged, and what the court does beyond this is void if you continue. You cannot lawfully proceed.



You are beyond the ninety day limit of ORS 1.050 that you must answer questions before the court within ninety days or give a written reason for the delay, which has not happened. You refused to answer and tried to dismiss my motion. There are mandated prison sentences for failure to answer or if you try to fabricate a document to appear that you have filed for an extension. You will answer to the people.



(At least two people stand - state their names - "I concur that he has committed trespass of treason to the Constitution.")



To the Bailiff:

You have more than two people in open court under the Constitution of the US concurring treason. You have no choice. You must remove this man from the bench. You do have handcuffs, don't you? You refuse?





Title 18, Section 4, US Code, is MISPRISION OF FELONY. As the bailiff, you are now as guilty as he is. ARE THERE ANY ATTORNEYS PRESENT IN THE ROOM?





YOU ARE JUST AS GUILTY OP THE SAME CRIMES BECAUSE YOU FAILED TO STOP THIS MAN FROM COMMITTING TRESPASS OF TREASON AND MISPRISION OF FELONY TO THE CONSTITUTIONS. "Who ever having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony, cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, is guilty of the federal crime of misprision of felony." 18 United States Code, Sec. 4.



To the Bailiff:

Will you interfere if I perform a citizens' arrest on this man? I will not subject myself to be arrested performing a citizens' arrest, as is my constitutional right, but on the record, in open court I am placing Mr. Avera under citizens' arrest for the crimes of Trespass of Treason and Misprision of Felony here before God and my fellow State Citizens of the Republic of Oregon.



I WILL NOT PARTICIPATE IN A COURT OF NO DUE PROCESS AND WILL NOT ALLOW MY RIGHTS TO BE FURTHER VIOLATED. THIS IS NOT A COURT OF LAW, NO CONSTITUTION, ONLY A KANGAROO COURT, A TRIBUNAL FOR THE SOSCF. I WILL IMMEDIATELY APPEAL INTO THE UNITED STATES NINTH CIRCUIT COURT ANY THING YOU DO BEYOND THIS POINT, AND WILL PROSECUTE YOU TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW.





AS GOD IS MY WITNESS THIS CORRUPTION STOPS NOW.



DATED THIS 30th day of September, 1999 in Marion County, Salem, Oregon





______________________________________

Wilbur Russell Gaston, sui juris



I swear and testify before God that I witnessed the above citizens' arrest of ____(judge fred avera)______in the Marion County Courthouse and demand prosecution of this corrupt public servant according to STATE and Federal Laws and constitutional mandates for TRESPASS OF TREASON. (concurrers) ___________________________



Witness Name and Address ___________________________



Witness Name and Address ___________________________



Witness Name and Address ___________________________



Witness Name and Address



ADDITIONAL WITNESSES ___________________________



Witness Name and Address ___________________________



Witness Name and Address ___________________________



Witness Name and Address ___________________________



Witness Name and Address ___

[EnSabahNur]

So what happened with this. Damn, this would be fun just to do to see the looks on the faces of the others in the courtroom.