Attorney "liscence" and bond of indemnification

I have been afraid to start exhausting my administative procedure because of the fact that I do not want to go to court against an attorney.


I have been told that if I send a conditional acceptance to another person that it is supposed to remain between that person and I and attoney can not get involved.& So I recently asked a friend about this and they said that if the person that I am sending the conditional acceptance to uses their attorney to respond, I should ask them for a copy of their state liscence and their bond of indemnification.& My friend said that this will send the attorney running in the oposite direction as they do not have a liscence and they don't want anybody to touch their bond.


If somebody could expand on that it would be great.& I will continue to look into it as well.


Also, I went to my state web site link to look up liscensed persons and I found out that there isn't even an option to get an attorney's liscence.& I was told that if you ask an attorney to see their state issues liscence they will say, "I am a member of the bar", then I can say, "good for you, I am a member of Costco."& I thought that was a good way of putting their bar membership into perspective.


If I am off base here with the liscence issue please let me know.


Montana

[Jerseee]

get a notary to swear all parties in.& Including the judge.& now everyone has something to lose.

So, if I brought a notary I could swear in the opposing attorney as well as the judge?& Could they refuse to be sworn in?&


&

[Jerseee]

you could try to swear them in and of course they are going to refuse.& even make a big fuss and probably try to scare& you.& but the main purpose of the notary (IMHO) is to witness you signing the CPN in front of the judge and everyone.& Also have the baliff give it to the judge so that they can give it to the opposing party.& doing this effectively and openly is serving them and there is no argument from you.& If they refuse payment--then they are in dishonor.& Now you can stand the stand of the queen and really enforce your remedy.& This is a scenario not the actual anticipated events.& this is just a way to introduce your remedy without dispute.& Of course this is&not legal advice.

Jersee, i guess its a coincidence that im studying presenting the boe, bond or cpn to the judge in court. my only question about it is, in the beginning of your process of discharging with a instrument to the creditor, wouldnt presenting another note in court be discharging the same debt twice? you wouldnt want to wait until they have you in court to get discharge?

[Jerseee]

Kgod,

I would say yes. Personally, I would not even bring up the old CPN unless necessary. Just ask for the settlement offer and discharge then. Then if they refuse it (dishonor) then I would bring up the previous one. Remember what you told me?

"They can't have it both ways"