
04-08-2008, 02:52 AM
|
|
Waking Up
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 49
|
|
|
If The Other Side Submit False Documents To The Court
Tell me something, what would you do if you have submitted a winning complaint or motion to the court with concrete evidence (exhibits) to back you up and when you received the other side's answer/response, they naturally oppose what you say but they've actually submitted false documentation as their support also, how would you go about handling that?
Let me give more of a background, the particular evidence/exhibit you submitted actually shows that the lower courts had gotten your case mixed up with another when it made its ruling against you but the other submits a totally bogus document to counter. Let me add also that this case is against the city. Now, what would you do?
|

04-09-2008, 06:32 AM
|
|
Waking Up
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 49
|
|
|
Oh, so what's this, for some strange reason I'm persona non grata now?
Okay
|

04-09-2008, 11:48 AM
|
|
Waking Up
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 36
|
|
|
In my case I wrote a powerful complaint. This complaint was THREATENED after walking thru mud and as a last attempt at the FRAUDSTERS.
I to can prove they committed fraud upon me and the bankruptcy court. Although I can't find an attorney to assist us. If their good they aren't taking on cases.
What kind of case is yours? How are you basing your complaint? If it's against a mortgage lender mine wasn't based on state law it was based on The U.S.C. and Fdcpa
Needless to say I'm still waiting to see how they strike after the STRIKE I've given them. To me NO NEWS IS GOOD NEWS. RAN WITH THEIR TAIL IN BETWEEN THEIR LEGS. YOU CAN'T DENY THE TRUTH! NO JUDGE WILL EITHER.
Let us know,
Kathy
|

04-09-2008, 12:03 PM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 594
|
|
|
vague
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Charlie Blue
Oh, so what's this, for some strange reason I'm persona non grata now?
Okay
|
Your post is a little too vague if what you want is advice on what to do next.
Also, how do you know you filed a "winning" complaint if you haven't won the case yet?
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
|

04-09-2008, 09:18 PM
|
 |
Waking Up
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 26
|
|
|
Charlie Blue:
If records are submitted, they must be properly authenticated. Kleet Lbr. Co., Inc. v. Lucchese
|

04-10-2008, 03:12 PM
|
|
Waking Up
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 49
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by courttroubles
In my case I wrote a powerful complaint. This complaint was THREATENED after walking thru mud and as a last attempt at the FRAUDSTERS.
I to can prove they committed fraud upon me and the bankruptcy court. Although I can't find an attorney to assist us. If their good they aren't taking on cases.
What kind of case is yours? How are you basing your complaint? If it's against a mortgage lender mine wasn't based on state law it was based on The U.S.C. and Fdcpa
Needless to say I'm still waiting to see how they strike after the STRIKE I've given them. To me NO NEWS IS GOOD NEWS. RAN WITH THEIR TAIL IN BETWEEN THEIR LEGS. YOU CAN'T DENY THE TRUTH! NO JUDGE WILL EITHER.
Let us know,
Kathy
|
Mine is a landlord/tenant case. Anyway, someone informed me that in a situation like that I should "strike" and how to go about it. Thanks Kathy.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lawdog
Your post is a little too vague if what you want is advice on what to do next.
Also, how do you know you filed a "winning" complaint if you haven't won the case yet?
|
LOL Good point, a little ego-tripping I guess.
Anyway, as far as "vagueness", I don't know what you mean. Someone submits something to the court (either a complaint or motion), the other side submits their response with evidence/exhibits but there's one documents they submitted that the Petitioner knows is false. What do they [the Petitioner] do?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheIntelCritic
Charlie Blue:
If records are submitted, they must be properly authenticated. Kleet Lbr. Co., Inc. v. Lucchese
|
Thanks, good looking-out.
|

05-02-2008, 12:02 PM
|
|
Waking Up
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 49
|
|
|
Well, the decision came down today. The Appellate Court denied the stay even after proving the other side submitted false documentation.
|

05-02-2008, 12:13 PM
|
|
Mental Jujitsu
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 594
|
|
|
lost?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Charlie Blue
Well, the decision came down today. The Appellate Court denied the stay even after proving the other side submitted false documentation.
|
In other words, you lost. If so, maybe next time things will go your way. The universe has a way of evening things out.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:38 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
|
|