Pathology of Trolls

[palani]

As to trolls in general

Originally conceived as a race of giants, they have suffered the same fate as the Celtic Danann and are now regarded in Denmark and Sweden as dwarfs and imps supposed to live in caves or under the ground.

but let us not forget the female version either

trollop 1615, "slovenly woman," probably from troll (v.) in sense of "roll about, wallow."

"Many rayleing opprobrious Speeches and Invectives against the said Elizabeth, calling her Tripe and Trallop." [1682]

[ezrhythm]

Definite bump action on this thread!

[mrg]

Essence of troll:

Originally Posted by Lawdog

I'm sure you would, but Shoonra doesn't "go that way."
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/135599-post172.html

Originally Posted by Shoonra

"pants down" is, I think, Dave the Jailbird's usual attire.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/135493-post157.html

Originally Posted by Shoonra

DiM obviously has an eye for the boys.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/newrep...reply&p=135203

Originally Posted by Shoonra

You are hallucinating (one symptom of tertiary syphilis).
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/135182-post5.html

Originally Posted by Shoonra

I think Van Pelt is diseased at both ends.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/133347-post41.html

Originally Posted by Shoonra

...SFBFKADVP...
What a jerk.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/135094-post115.html

Originally Posted by Shoonra

SFBFKADVP is making even less sense than usual, and that's practically a superlative.

I suspect that his stint in prison did some damage to both ends of his body.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/135050-post112.html

Originally Posted by Shoonra

On the contrary, I am sure that in some
Colorado jail cell there's a pillow with your teeth marks in it.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/134877-post71.html

Originally Posted by Shoonra

Not everyone is as eager as you for the swinging singles scene inside a gated community.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/134741-post47.html

Originally Posted by Shoonra

Garbage and more garbage

DiM claims that I made some reference about him regarding prison rape.

I never suggested he had been raped.

I have always believed that he was extremely willing and cooperative.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/134706-post25.html

Originally Posted by Shoonra

DiM hasn't been locked in a federal slammer ....yet, but I am sure he can give you advice about forming meaningful relationships behind bars.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/133796-post2.html

Originally Posted by Shoonra

SFBFKADVP must be going senile.

I feel sure that Van Pelt made himself popular in the slammer, and won praise for his purty mouth.

And I sure that he hated to leave his cellmates behind.

And that his cellmate misses Van Pelt's behind, too.
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/133343-post38.html

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

Sort of like...ummm, YOU?

Indeed, I must say, my boy.

You say you are a "lawyer," son?

You "SAY" you are a "lawyer?"

So you "SAY."

‘You are old,’ Father William, ‘and your jaws are too weak
 For anything tougher than suet;
Yet you finished the goose, with the bones and the beak—
 Pray how did you manage to do it?’

‘In my youth,’ said his father, ‘I took to the law,
 And argued each case with my wife;
And the muscular strength, which it gave to my jaw,
 Has lasted the rest of my life.’

License to practice.

One, two, three, four

Giddy up
Giddy up

Well I'm a long tall Texan
I ride a big white horse
(He rides from Texas on a big white horse)

Well I'm a long tall Texan
I ride a big white horse
(He rides from Texas on a big white horse)

Well people look at me and say
Oh Roy, Oh Roy is that your horse?
(He rides from Texas on a big white horse)
Yeah

Well I'm a long tall Texan
I wear a ten gallon hat
(He rides from Texas with a ten gallon hat)

Well I'm a long tall Texan
I wear a ten gallon hat
(He rides from Texas with a ten gallon hat)

Well people look at me and say
Oh Roy, Oh Roy is that your hat?
(He rides from Texas with a ten gallon hat)
Yeah

Well I was walkin' down the street
With my shinin' badge
My spurs jinglin' down at my feet
I seen a man a comin'
Comin' with a gun
And I just can't be beat

Well I'm a long tall Texan
I enforce justice for the law
(He rides from Texas to enforce the law)

Well I'm a long tall Texan
I enforce justice for the law
(He rides from Texas to enforce the law)

Well people look at me and say
Oh Roy, Oh Roy is you the law?
(He rides from Texas to enforce the law)

Lyle Lovett
The Beach Boys

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Shoonra

It is a sobriquet for DiM that I found on another website.

According to DiM, it began on Quatloos although that was not where I found it.

It serves as evidence that other websites have already wearied of his nonsense.

SFBFKADVP

Where did you find it?

What prompts you to claim it is merely "an affectionate or humorous nickname," "an assumed name," ("sobriquet," ROTFLMFAO!) as one source might have it?

Perhaps, though, you mean, "a descriptive name or epithet (abusive or contemptuous word or phrase)," as another source would have it?

How, precisely, and with specific particularity is "it," in fact that "It serves as evidence that other websites have already wearied of his nonsense?"

Does it have, perhaps, any characteristics of an acronym?

If you recognize it as such, do you know what it is an acronym for?

If you do know, would you be so kind as to publicly expand it properly for posterity?

Or do you claim to "not know?"

("Plausible" "denial?")

S___________
F____________
B____________
F______________
K_____________
A____________
D____________
V_______________
P_______________

Could you outline your personal and/or professional experiential familiarity with the hallucinatory manifestations of what you have designated and represented upon another member as "tertiary syphilis?"

High Class "legal" "arguments" from the BAR's finest

Which, would signify precisely what specifically?

[mrg]

Originally Posted by ezrhythm

More projecting from the anti sui juris!

In psychology, psychological projection (or projection bias) is a defense mechanism in which one attributes one’s own unacceptable or unwanted thoughts or/and emotions to others. Projection reduces anxiety by allowing the expression of the unwanted subconscious impulses/desires without letting the ego recognize them.

The above also constitutes pathological manifestation of obsessive compulsion of the tactical passive aggressive condition, as well as fallacious logical ad hominem rhetorical artifice.

Furthermore:

Originally Posted by Lawdog

The second sentence is the REAL nonsense there.

Is this:

Originally Posted by Lawdog

The second sentence is the REAL nonsense there.

indeed FACT, or, perhaps OPINION, or, mere CLAIM?

Does Lawdog have a verifiable record of posting "...FACT not OPINION..." as he CLAIMS or, does LAWDOG pathologically post somewhat rhetorically convoluted OPINION ("belief") as may be illustrated in LAWDOG'S own words?

If FACT:

Can LAWDOG substantiate the FACT with verifiably valid proof positive?

If not, why not?

Will you substantiate the FACT with verifiably valid proof positive?

If not, why not?


If this is merely your CLAIM:

Can LAWDOG PROVE your CLAIM scrupulously adhering to academically prescribed and accepted process of left hemispheric higher order meta-cognitive skills through demonstrating application of comprehensively analytical prior first hand knowledge, proven and verifiably validated,demonstrating conclusive evaluative epagoge based upon the whole of the above successfully complete and impartial exercise?

If not, why not?

Will you PROVE your CLAIM scrupulously adhering to academically prescribed and accepted process of left hemispheric higher order meta-cognitive skills through demonstrating application of comprehensively analytical prior first hand knowledge, proven and verifiably validated, demonstrating conclusive evaluative epagoge based upon the whole of the above successfully complete and impartial exercise?

If not, why not?

Thus far, how, precisely is it not FACT that you have a, by now, substantial record of default, claiming that you WILL NOT respond?


How, precisely, would it not, rather be that you, in FACT cannot uprightly, straightforwardly, forthrightly, honestly, and impartially respond with integrity, nor can you afford to?

[farmer_giles_of_ham]

And the worst part is the only contribution made is "hire any attorney". I mean, if this was a forum to talk about medical problems, and some doctors got on and refused to give any input based on their own (supposedly) professional experience, but just said "get any doctor"...what good is that? We are here to learn about legal issues so I am still waiting for some 'expert' to actually contribute, not tear down: CONTRIBUTE.


Example: "yes it is possible to be 'pro per' or 'pro se', so how can I help in that case". Or how about "get an attorney, here's what to look for, what to demand, how to handle your case".

But it never happens. Just endless derailing bottom-feeder tactics, and finally homosexual innuendo. Which is what has really turned me off at this point.

I can only conclude that the 'fraternity' must be really worried about some of what goes on here, as threatening their monopoly, so therefore- it must be true. We don't get everything right (no thanks to the BAR), but this is the right track: since they don't like it.

If it was only online that would be one thing but it parallels all my real-life experience as well.

[mertensv16]

Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham

I mean, if this was a forum to talk about medical problems, and some doctors got on and refused to give any input based on their own (supposedly) professional experience, but just said "get any doctor"...what good is that?

Do you honestly think any reputable doctor would hand out a diagnosis without ever examining the patient?

We are here to learn about legal issues so I am still waiting for some 'expert' to actually contribute, not tear down: CONTRIBUTE.

Since when did any of the denizens of Sui Juris put any stock in the advice given out by the law profession? What with the B.A.R. nonsense and the inane legal theories involving the UCC (among other things), it's pretty apparent that they think they already know the law, so what's the good of any advice from experts? In any event, when the real law is explained to them by experts it's something they don't want to hear because it runs counter to either their preconceived notions of what the law should be or something they've read on Sui Juris or some crackpot's website(which must be true). Instead, they automatically stick their heads in the sand and ignore the advice while parroting the tired old complaints about "the corrupt system", which is code for "all of the courts have ruled against my argument, so they must be corrupt."

You may call it tearing down, but the first thing you need to understand is that if you truly want to learn about the legal system and get good advice, you have to (a) discard the theories that have no basis in the law and don't work, and (b) lose the paranoid attitude about the legal experts.

I can only conclude that the 'fraternity' must be really worried about some of what goes on here, as threatening their monopoly, so therefore- it must be true.

Remember the old Fram oil filter commercials? "You can pay me now, or pay me later," referring to the difference in cost between a new oil filter and an engine overhaul. Rest assured, it will cost you a lot more to get out of an absolute mess you've gotten into by following some absurd legal theory on Sui Juris than it will to get the proper legal advice in the first place. In addition, any attorney representing a creditor would just love to see someone file a "Refused for Cause" answer to a lawsuit, since he'll just proceed to get a default judgment for his client. Thanks to "what goes on here", you've made his job that much easier.

[Lawdog]

mertensv16:

Very well said.

Careful...between you, me, Shoonra, and KarenM, some sanity is starting to seep through over here. LOL

[ezrhythm]

It is EXTREMELY more exhilerating and fullfilling to defeat an attorney than it is to hire one!!!