04-21-2008, 07:08 PM
|
 |
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,013
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mertensv16
Since when did any of the denizens of Sui Juris put any stock in the advice given out by the law profession?
|
And YOU are other than a "denizen of Sui Juris?"
If not what are you?
This perhaps:
Here for some of the old "yo ho ho" and a bit of the old "Jolly" "Roger?"
Who in "the law profession" are you referring to?
I see here nothing but
1. one self-proclaimed "attorney"/"lawyer"/"legal" poseur merely talking the talk, (and contradicting himself at every turn of the road), who wants to hold one to one set of demands for proof of claim, yet refuses to prove his own credibility as to the facts of his being of any "licensed" "legal" "profession;"
2. a failed "attorney"/"lawyer," relegated to fetching stare decisis card castle "legislation from the bench," for star chamber wagering agents, and
3. an International Monetary fund debt collector who draws a salary authorized by the Department of Agriculture.
Are YOU an "attorney?"
A "lawyer?"
A BAR card holder?
A bona fide member of the "legal" "profession?"
PROVE IT.
STRAIGHT UP PROVE IT.
You do know how to do that don't you?
Do you know, or know of anyone here who is?
PROVE THEY ARE.
Otherwise I hear but hollow claims of third-rate pavement artists hawking their own spurious "legal" "theories."
Verstehst du?
(Learn the difference between acronym and "all caps," will you--you "legal" "experts" DO print certain items in "legal" documents in "all caps," right?)
Most of your inane post consists of deceptively portraying the site in such a manner to avail yourself of a strawman argument--a deplorably cheap tactical rhetorical artifice.
By the way, many are here PRECISELY BECAUSE they did, unfortunately "put...stock in the advice given out by the law profession."
|
04-21-2008, 09:01 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,013
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
The problem is that mrg has already said that he doesn't regard court decisions as any sort of proof, so, for all the psychobabble about "meta-cognitive" and the like, mrg has pretty much ruled out all the accepted methods of supporting legal arguments.
Of course, mrg has yet to support his own assertions in any proper way, so it's wash.
|
"Decisions?" "Rulings," perhaps? By what means? Opinion?
Yes?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
Here is a Supreme Court opinion.
|
"...proper way...?"
"...accepted methods...?"
"...proper way," according to whose OPINION; for, you see, the phrases "proper way," and "accepted methods," are, of a matter of course, open to speculative interpretation, are they not, and thus, would logically be, perhaps, subject to opinion (BELIEF)?
Further, and more importantly:
Will you kindly provide a quote where I have actually "said" (so YOU say), specifically, and with precise particularity, that I do not "regard court decisions as any sort of proof?"
For how, precisely, is it other than that while your "whine cellar" sewing circle's ad hominem gang-rape, though cowardly; serpentinely presuming to put precise words into my mouth is a low and pitiable sham ruse, at best?
Thank you though for testifying that I do indeed "support" my "own assertions" (just not in keeping with what is in your own beliefs as to what constitutes "accepted" methods" (e.g. ad hominem attacks alleging homosexuality and "tertiary syhphilis?")
Ma nisrat lech bamoch?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lawdog
Well, Shoonra, mrg (aka mindlessly repeating gibberish) appears to be a loudmouthed drunk with a thesaurus fetish.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KarenM
and a severe case of "parens" envy - parentheses for the linguistically-challenged
|
|
Translation: "I can't prove up. I won't prove up. You can't make me prove up!!" "Waah, Waaah!!!"
 
Left to right: KAPUST stirring the pot, SUSSMAN holding the howling lawdog. KarenM and a young SUSSMAN?
Here, I will remove the offending stipulatives that neither the three of you appear able to fathom nor (obviously), accomplish:
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
Quote:
Originally Posted by gldskr
28 USC Sec. 1746(1) contemplates geography not jurisdiction, because if it did, it would be a non sensical impossibility.
The USC is a corporate code and only concerns corporate matters.
|
The second sentence is the REAL nonsense there.
|
Is this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
The second sentence is the REAL nonsense there.
|
indeed FACT, or, perhaps OPINION, or, mere CLAIM?
Quote:
Originally Posted by gldskr
The USC is a corporate code and only concerns corporate matters.
|
[For, you see, I earnestly seek a validly verified "legal" expert's evaluative analysis of integrally comprehensive knowledge applied to gldskr's own applicable evaluative analysis of integrally comprehensive knowledge ("The USC is a corporate code and only concerns corporate matters.), in order to form my own applicable evaluative analysis of integrally comprehensive knowledge, and, so, you see, according to LAWDOG himself, he IS such PERSON. I am sorry to have to give expression in those terms, that you have such difficulty with, for, you see, I must. I greatly apologize if you cannot yet comprehend.]
Does Lawdog have a verifiable record of posting "...FACT not OPINION..." as he CLAIMS or, does LAWDOG post somewhat rhetorically convoluted OPINION ("belief") as may be illustrated in LAWDOG'S own words?
If FACT:
Can you substantiate the FACT with verifiably valid proof positive?
[There are but two (2) RESPONSIVE answers.]
If not, why not?
Will you substantiate the FACT with verifiably valid proof positive?
[There are but two (2) RESPONSIVE answers.]
If not, why not?
If this is merely your CLAIM:
Can you PROVE your CLAIM
[There are but two (2) RESPONSIVE answers.]
If not, why not?
Will you PROVE your CLAIM?
[There are but two (2) RESPONSIVE answers.]
If not, why not?
Thus far, how, precisely is it not FACT that you have a, by now, substantial record of default, claiming that you WILL NOT respond?
How, precisely, would it not, rather be that you, in FACT cannot uprightly, straightforwardly, forthrightly, honestly, and impartially respond with integrity, nor can you afford to?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
Quote:
Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham
There is a lot of space being wasted by a few trolls with a very particular agenda
|
...we want to keep this site a "circle jerk"
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lawdog
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
The problem is that mrg has already said that he doesn't regard court decisions as any sort of proof, so, for all the psychobabble about "meta-cognitive" and the like, mrg has pretty much ruled out all the accepted methods of supporting legal arguments.
Of course, mrg has yet to support his own assertions in any proper way, so it's wash.
|
Well, Shoonra, mrg (aka mindlessly repeating gibberish) appears to be a loudmouthed drunk with a thesaurus fetish.
You can't really expect too much from someone like that.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KarenM
and a severe case of "parens" envy - parentheses for the linguistically-challenged
|
Last edited by mrg : 04-21-2008 at 10:34 PM.
|
04-21-2008, 09:02 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,013
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KarenM
As usual, another valuable, content-filled contribution to the forums.
Although, your family pictures are quite good.
It's not everyone who goes to the trouble of having etchings done.
|
Is this what you mean?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KarenM
The acronym is essentially equivalent to POSKNAMRG.
Have a nice day.
|
In fact, what does that mean?
You want to spell it out like a man, or are you a coward?
Click here: KAPUST, ANDY
Now THIS really IS "another valuable, content-filled contribution to the forums."
Hey Andy doesn't it just warm the cockles of your red blooded true blue All-American™ HEART© to know that the people whose "protection" racket you are a strong arm enforcer for are the proud sponsors of:
  
Hey Andy, there's some real pictures of my family. We call the one on the right "Lucky."
"Etch" that into the hole in your soul.
Why don't you quit hanging with those creatures you are here "trolling" for and join the family, maybe you could work to keep this from happening instead of making sure it does happen; its not too late yet, or is it?
YOUR TAX FRN's AT WORK (And...its all perfectly "legal," they are dead right about that!)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KarenM
Have a nice day.
|
"AND ALL THE SHIPS AT SEA"
Last edited by mrg : 04-21-2008 at 09:09 PM.
|
05-03-2008, 08:34 AM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,013
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lawdog
ezrhythm:
You're right, I can't produce a contract under seal.
Not from any kind of court, admiralty or otherwise.
Because contracts are not required to be sealed.
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
your signature is your seal.
Signing is sealing.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
You're right, I can't produce a contract under seal.
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
I've closed deals where there was a contract to lend more than half a million dollars.
The person borrowing the money only had to sign it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
You're right, I can't produce a contract under seal.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
your signature is your seal.
|
Quote:
No golden sticker needed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
your signature is your seal.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
You're right, I can't produce a contract under seal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The person borrowing the money only had to sign |
05-07-2008, 07:17 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,013
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
My research begins here:
...a serious inept, retarded ass...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, duh, duh
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
I hate to burst the bubble here.
Judicial has one more "I" in it.
|
I hate to burst the bubble here, but "Judicial" has no uppercase letters within it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrg
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Your such a fool.
|
And you're not living in a glass house?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Please refrain Bump-On-The-Head from these type of posts.
|
Please refrain AKA-on-the AKA-on-the AKA-on-the AKA-on-the-AKA from these types of posts.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
...horrible piece of dung...
PIECE OF CRAP
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
bogus, Bull****, evidence of crap like thinking skills.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Voting is not a duty.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
GOVERNMENT CODE
274. An elector has no rights or duties beyond those of a citizen not an elector, except the right and duty of holding office and voting.
|
|
Quote:
|
321. "Elector" means any person who is a United States citizen 18 years of age or older and a resident of an election precinct at least 15 days prior to an election.
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Right there it says in plain English that a 8 year old could understand
Duh, Duh, Duh.
What a retarded argument.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
...the author of this piece of trash...
You are a freakin' retard.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrg
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
How is it that you are so stupid?
...if my fist happens to punch your ass some 1,000 times in the face...
|
Seems you do not know your ass from your face.
LAW GENERAL looking for his fist.
As far as, "How is it that you are so stupid?" goes, "your" "fingers" have gotten "your" "natural" "person's" "ass" banned from here how many times?
Yet you keep re-appearing, with precisely the same rhetoric?
What is it that you call it when a person invariably does the same thing over and over again and expects a different result?
Is their some innuendo in "your" choice of analogy?
So, we have one alleged "attorney" running around with a concealed weapon fantasizing about a "jerk" to pull it on so he can observe the "look on his face," another alleged "attorney" obsessed with fantasies of homosexual oral and anal sex in prison, an IMF strong arm debt collector posing as a woman, and a "wannabe" "lawyer," posting a fantasy about his fist punching someone "some 1,000 times?"
And these people believe they are the "sane" ones?
Again the stereotypical posting pattern of the common troll:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
How is it that you are so stupid?
[generally vague irrelevant non-substantial filler]
Your entire process of reasoning is so ill that you shame adult american's just by posting your ridiculous crap.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TROLL186
1. Introduction; predicate, thesis statement:
Personal attack, low and foul tactical ad hominem rhetorical artifice.
2. Body; supporting evidence:
Sadistic, anti-social, foulmouthed rhetoric.
3. Summary:
Personal attack--more often than not demonstrating a level of functional illiteracy.
|
What does your apparently superior "process of reasoning" tell you about "adult american's?"
...adult american's?
Some thing (not enumerated or identified) belongs to an adult (singular??) "american?"
|
|
Perhaps you might consider learning basic elementary school English grammar, spelling, and punctuation someday?
(Or what, perhaps, used to be basic elementary school English grammar, spelling, and punctuation.)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
I don't see nothing in there that says military are not citizens.
Do you?
|
Perhaps you should consider Spanish?
Spanish embraces the double negative, English does not.
Elementary school anyone?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Bump in the Head (Jerry Pitts)
1) You are clinically brain damaged and lost your job do to failed mental faculties.
2) You are homosexual and appear to be interested in men on this site.
Therefore I will not respond to a brain-damaged homo anymore. Ignore listed.
|
You're still here?
What are your own "failed mental faculties" DUE to?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
So you agree that voting is not a duty, it is a franchise.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Voting is not a duty.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
GOVERNMENT CODE
274. An elector has no rights or duties beyond those of a citizen not an elector, except the right and duty of holding office and voting.
|
|
Quote:
|
321. "Elector" means any person who is a United States citizen 18 years of age or older and a resident of an election precinct at least 15 days prior to an election.
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Just to tell you that the "duty" thing is one reason out of many many many that this essay is complete garbage.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
GOVERNMENT CODE
274. An elector has no rights or duties beyond those of a citizen not an elector, except the right and duty of holding office and voting.
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
My research begins here:
...a serious inept, retarded ass...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, duh, duh
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by freebeme
First off I have counseled three people in law at the bar.
|
I have never seen proof of any of your "courtroom victory" CLAIMS.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, duh, duh
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeme
See MRG, I have letters from three judges recommending me to any law school.
|
No, I don't SEE any of that, in fact.
Do the "judges" speak English?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
I don't see nothing in there that says military are not citizens.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeme
I just have no need to go.
|
Or is it, perhaps, the lack of ability to pass a competency examination in elementary school level English grammar skills, much less that of any university level?
Why are you talking to "yourself?"
Again?
|
Last edited by mrg : 06-25-2008 at 11:28 AM.
|
05-18-2008, 04:30 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,013
|
|
|
Essence of Codeeee
A sampling of the True Wisdom of the current incarnation of ubiquitous omniscience:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
The first draft I sent out had some 1,000 spelling errors.
I am not really interested in formatting.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
I can think with a healthy brian.
|
|
|
"I can thimk with a healthy BRIAN."
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
First off moron,
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
My research begins here:
...a serious inept, retarded ass...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, duh, duh
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
*****-liar-whore
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
YOU ARE STUPID!!!
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, duh, duh
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
...can you geriatric mind see...?
WTF...
You are truly stupid.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Wies...
Yoohoo!
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Sometimes I forget how stupid you are.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Any stupid @ss comment?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, duh, duh
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
*****-liar-whore
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
F the jury and sue their @SS.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Go be a moron somewhere else.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
f@cked my mother in court
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
*****-liar-whore
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
RIGHT HERE RETARD
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Also, thank you for having insane citation to this so that we do not suffer the same old, "I won, but there is no record" horse ****.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Marijuana.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Drivel Drivel, Drool Drool.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, duh, duh
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
You pampers boy?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Here it is idiot man.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Before your diaper wearing ass was even on this forum
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
...all of your garbage and crappy posts...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
You are a retard.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
You are a loser.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Hey moron.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, duh, duh
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
...in my mind you are borderline retarded.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
...try shutting up...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Wow! Now if you just find someone who gives a sh!t,
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Completely insane!!!
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
I said I thought I knew him.
He asked how.
I told him I thought my Brother use to F his wife.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
...one more post from idiots.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
I am about the third top poster on this forum.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, duh, duh
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
...ten posts or so in a row form your dumb-ass...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
You are a loser.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
You ideas amount to inilectual sh!t.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, duh, duh
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
You are brainwashed by suijuris idiots.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
...horrible piece of dung...
PIECE OF CRAP
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
...your incredible stupid posts filled with your moronic opinions.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, duh, duh
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
A true David Merrill level imbecile.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
You are homosexual and appear to be interested in men on this site.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
I will not respond to a brain-damaged homo anymore.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
You are lame in brain...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
bogus, Bull****, evidence of crap like thinking skills.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Drivel Drivel, Drool Drool.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, duh, duh
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Seems like horse **** to me.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
You are clinically brain damaged and lost your job do to failed mental faculties.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
AdamWies...Anything???
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Maybe you posted in the wring thread Lumpy Head?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
...your own, worthless, unofficial, opinion that everyone else in the nation disagrees with.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
I love haw idiots...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, duh, duh
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
You have to be a serious inept, retarded ass...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
You are a freakin' retard.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
What a retarded argument.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, Duh, Duh.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
I have letters from three judges recommending me to any law school.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Duh, Duh, Duh.
|
KEEP IT COMING BRO:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Drivel Drivel, Drool Drool.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
butt-f#ckin'-retard-BillyThorton.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
You are also just a walking retard.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
@ass eater.
moronic Billy Thorton's @ss eater.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
I thing you are a complete inbred, degenerate, loser, idiot retard
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
sever mental retard.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
me and my family will ruin you.
It is that easy.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
my best stick just got shot in your mama's face.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Drivel Drivel, Drool Drool.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
brain-damage retards.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
You are a *****-liar-whore.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Which one of you is a complete brain damage retard and which is an idiot without the ability to learn?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Drivel Drivel, Drool Drool.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
*****-liar-whore
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
Awfully retarded fellas.
|
In his own words...
Last edited by mrg : 05-23-2008 at 11:26 PM.
|
05-23-2008, 11:23 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,013
|
|
|
Psssst: Codeeee, ese, bro...
Hey codeeeee:
CLICK HERE: In YOUR own words...
Straight from the horse's.......ummm....mouth?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Little Brother 192
And this is you MRG
 |
|
Last edited by mrg : 05-24-2008 at 12:07 AM.
|
05-30-2008, 06:15 PM
|
|
Come and Get Some!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois Republic
Posts: 3,013
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lawdog
loser tactic
Ah...the typical tactic of the fool who is losing an argument badly.
Instead of responding rationally to the points being made by the other side, the loser blurts,
"Oh, yeah?
Well, you're a Nazi!"
(Or racist, sexist, etc.)
Pathetic, boys. Really pathetic.
|
Would you care to see a truly "pathetic" compilation of your own prolific use of a despicable rhetorical artifice that is, indeed, " the typical tactic of the fool who is losing an argument badly?"
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawdog
Instead of responding rationally to the points being made by the other side, the loser blurts,
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lawdog
| | | |
