Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Court
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2008, 06:28 PM
Jerry Pitts Jerry Pitts is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,134
Special treatment for the Elitist agents

Below, you will find a link to an article published by a bar certified. IT clearly shows that in some instances, the elitist members of society and of the government, do have special privileges and that those privileges will be enforced without a proper showing on the part of the commoner that these privileges should be abated in the issue at hand.

A short excerpt from the article, followed by the url:

"As evidenced with the recent Congressional testimony by the leaders of the tobacco industry,apex1 officials are becoming more willing to stand up and defend their companies in times of trouble. At the same time, no discovery device has become more troublesome for companies than a notice for the deposition of their top executives.2 In light of these developments, courts across the country have been attempting to create standards to balance the rights of litigants to obtain relevant and discoverable information from apex officials against the official’s right to avoid undue burden and abuse.3

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court in a unanimous opinion ruled that a sitting President does not have legal immunity from allegations involving his personal conduct, thereby refusing to postpone President Clinton’s deposition in the Paula Jones case.4 The President contended that he occupies a unique office with responsibilities so vast and important that public interest demands that he devote his undivided time and attention to his public duties.5 Although the Court refused to postpone his deposition, the Court did hold that the “prestige of the position” should be considered when determining “the conduct of the entire proceeding, including the timing and scope of discovery.”6 These same policy concerns exist when any apex official is noticed for deposition and thus courts must always consider the “timing and scope” of apex discovery. Although Florida appellate courts have yet to establish guidelines for apex discovery, decisions from other districts have generated workable and persuasive criteria that should be applied in Florida.7 "

Enjoy the read.


http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/JN/...f?OpenDocument
__________________
Summa Ratio est quae pro Religione facit.
If ever the laws of God and man are at variance, the former are to be obeyed in derogation of the latter.

'Many are the plans in a man's heart,
but it's the Lord's purpose that prevails."
Proverbs 19:21.

"The most important office in a democracy is the office of citizen."
Louis Brandeis, U.S. Supreme Court Justice (1916-1939) referring to the responsibility of voters.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crime lab nixes CSI treatment at Spector trial Archibald 'Harry' Tuttle Office of Information Retrieval 1 04-08-2007 06:18 AM
Teen battles state over cancer treatment Archibald 'Harry' Tuttle Office of Information Retrieval 3 08-13-2006 10:06 PM
Judge Orders Teen to Cancer Treatment - Sick! Mark Health 0 07-23-2006 11:25 AM
johanna budwig cancer treatment dave b Health 5 02-23-2006 10:39 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:37 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2007 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer