Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Right to the Castle
First your whole premise is whack.
Who care if Lawdog says "opinions."
Everyone knows that "decisions" are what is important.
|
First, "
YOUR whole premise" here is predicated solely on
ad hominem tactical rhetorical artifice.
That is predicate, thesis statement, and (the only) "substance."
What follows consists of vague and curious generalities devoid of substance.
Quote:
"My" "premise?"
"Whole?"
"Everyone?"
"Knows?"
"Opinions?"
"Decisions?"
"Important?"
|
What, precisely, and with specific particularity do you mean?
"Who care if...?"
Is English your second language?
Your stock-in-trade, historically, consists, ultimately (and, laughably, quite ironically), of denigrating--most foully--the character, intellect, etc. of others, yet you appear here, quite, quite often, as but
semi-literate, and apparently prone to exercise a peculiar grudge against what is, applicable to yourself, possibly a bit of what is commonly, albeit undeservedly, known as "Learning Disability," by an ill-conceived pre-emptive
projection of, perhaps, YOUR perception of your own inherent
lack of social and communication skills, and corresponding academic technical ability
upon others.
That is classic pathology of passive-aggression.
What actually--in practice, operation, and application--is, in fact, "important" (crucial) to the so-called "decision," among other atrocities are:
heavily armed corporate municipal mercenary troops;
an extremely well-oiled propaganda machine;
oligarchic monopolistic construction, promotion, and maintenance of a non-constitutional quasi-legalized wagering industry trafficking in men, women, and children, and dominated exclusively by Tory Loyalist private for-profit trade guild BAR bastard attorneys in fraternal collusion (an exercise in extreme conflict of interest, to say the least);
and, the drug-dealing, gun-running,
slave-marketing, Columbine
foreign occupation junta as blathering front-men to stellionatizing
war financiers/investors/profiteers--
--that are "important" (crucial) to the whole anti-social, misanthropic, Malthusian, Machiavellian syndicated criminal racketeering operation.
What is your own gain through interest on the principal for volunteering into propping-up such a pathetically inebriated
status quo?
How, precisely, are "Case" and "court," "opinion" and (so-called) "decision," especially in your's (wannabe) and your private, for-profit, oligarchic monopoly trade guild BAR ASSOCIATION idols' narrow-minded, ill-conceived, viewpoint, and, by now, hopelessly, and,
in-cest-u-ously bastardized forms and practices, standard and/or benchmark for the integral whole and impartial "judicial Power"
inherent in We the People's organic constitutional forms of republican government?
Quote:
A republican form of government means a republic.
In a republic the administration of affairs is open to all CITIZENS©.
A court is a republican institution where affairs are administered.
You must administer your affairs of court yourself or waive this right.
MOST PEOPLE, myself included, thought that John signed the Great Charter of English Liberties and became good King John afterwards.
This is wrong.
As soon as John got the rebel barons to disband their armies he waged holy war against them for the rest of his life.
OUR CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, thus, must be defended and we must defend it to the best of our ability.
When you invoke a court you must assert your jurisdiction to hold it and cannot let the judge usurp your judicial power.
This means you do not pay an attorney fee to him to conduct your court, you do not submit documents to him for his approval, you do not motion him to move your court, you deny everything he has tried to file and you strike anything that he has attempted to enter of record.
He will not like you.
You are not trying to make friends with him.
Without the judge you can eject attorneys and enter your own orders including a declaratory judgment if no other party appears for court in person.
If a few of us do this we can be hunted down and exterminated.
If thousands of us do this it may succeed.
I'm telling you how to fight but not promising victory.
|
HERE is, perhaps, the essence of the common law.
How precisely, is it otherwise?
Do I, myself, no longer have right to this, and the whole of common law likewise formed?
If not, how is this so, and, precisely, how has this become so?
Do I have right to a trial BY an IMPARTIAL jury?
Where, precisely is JUDGE specified, or allowed in the terms IMPARTIAL jury?
Do I have liberty to freely and fully address that same jury as to "trial BY a jury?"
Do I have Freedom, borne from Liberty, to have the written
record of the common law as exemplified above, and in "The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America," and "this Constitution for the United States of America," addressed to, and then presented to that IMPARTIAL jury, and made tangibly available during their deliberation upon a decision?
If not, very precisely, and with specific particularity, why not?
If not, where is Liberty, and its Freedom paid for in blood?
Quote:
A republican form of government means a republic.
In a republic the administration of affairs is open to all CITIZENS©.
A court is a republican institution where affairs are administered.
You must administer your affairs of court yourself or waive this right.
|
If it is otherwise, can you/will you, please show precisely how and why it is otherwise, and have the moral decency to at least call it what it is?
Linear Mode
