My trouble making for today =D, Part I

[netwrkranger]

Legal System vs. Law System - In The City of London, There Are Four Inns of Court by Jim Townsend

Legal System vs. Law System
Authored by Jim Townsend

In the City of London, there are four Inns of Court. These Inns are private country clubs of the rich and have been around for 1000 years, so they certainly have perfected their techniques.

Their trade is deceit. There is a difference between 'lawful' and 'legal'. Lawful contemplates the spirit of the law and is embodied in the moral and ethical consideration of rendering unto each man his due. Legal is the 'form of the law' and merely means that it is written down someplace. It is quite possible for something to be "legal" and still be totally unlawful.

These Inns of Court are a private enterprise. The main players are made up of the Knights of the Garter and the Queen and Queen Mother themselves are members of both the Inner and Middle Temple.

You can read about their history at http://www.innertemplelibrary.org.uk and you will find the 'legal rules and regulations' for your country posted here. The United States’ legal system is owned by the same court that owns Ireland. These Inns of Court make a living by usurping the 'laws of the land' and replacing them with the "legal system / administration / pirate 'laws' of the high seas." These pirates should be flying the skull and crossbones, not the flag of the US. In other words, these people pretend that they are applying laws, when they are really using their unlawful legal system to usurp the laws of the land. Americans generally think they won the war against the British. In actual fact, they lost it in their courts.

Look back into the middle ages at pictures of Justice. She is a buxom blonde with the most beautiful bright blue eyes. So now you know who tied the rag around her head and left her sitting blind folded on the steps of the court house. Of course, these people are ever so much more intelligent than us that they flaunt their symbols in our face and laugh at our stupidity. Would you give someone a sword and then blindfold them? Of course not, but the people behind all this have no problem blindfolding or 'hoodwinking' our young men and sending them off to battle where their efforts will do nothing more than entrench us ever deeper into their system of deceit.

The Bar Associations of both Canada and the US and many other countries are nothing more than these 'Legal System' franchises. Look carefully and you will see that every time your country has been sold down the river, it has been by the members of this franchise. These franchised lawyers quite literally have 'legal licenses to steal,' and steal they do. Now you know why your own Constitution has no bearing when you are in a 'legal court.' Were you in a lawful court where the 'law of the land' was being upheld, you would have a fighting chance, but as it is, when we go into court we are in a game called shooting fish in a barrel.

Their is only one way you get a KBE and that is through SERVICES RENDERED to the British 'Crown.' The 'Crown' is not the Queen by the way, but refers to the 'Crown in Chancery,' a legislative authority of Bankers and Lawyers from Chancery Lane which backs off Fleet Street. Now ask yourself what service did Giuliani render to get his knighthood? Even a better one; what service did George Bush render to become a Knight of the British Crown? A Knight swears allegiance to her Majesty when he is knighted. Doesn't it bother you guys (US citizens) that you have people in positions of power that have sworn allegiance to a foreign power?

Interestingly, in 1387, there was a 'peasants rebellion' in England and all the Lawyers, Judiciary and members of these Inns had their throats slit, which was quite an apt punishment for these treasonous little traitors. You can read about this uprising in the excellent book entitled "Born in Blood." Fact of the matter is that every member of the Bar Association is guilty of treason, for they have subverted the 'laws of the land.'

The legal systems of both our countries are fronted out of England. The banking systems of both our countries are fronted out of Belgium. And both of them are financially controlled lock stock and barrel by Switzerland, you know; the home of the UN, IMF, WTO, and Bank of International Settlements which controls the 'Bank of Canada' and the 'Federal Reserve' in the US. Ever wonder why Switzerland was neutral and Heir Hitler even respected their 'neutrality' while he bombed literally every other country around him?

[netwrkranger]

Inner Temple History

The Freehold

The society occupied the Inn as tenants of the Knights Hospitaller until 1540, when the possessions of that order were vested in the Crown (32 Hen. VIII, c. 24). No pre-1540 leases have survived, and it may be that the Inn was held under some kind of informal tenancy at will; even after the society attorned to the Crown in 1540, no written lease appears to have been drawn up. In 1608 King James I conveyed the Temple in fee simple to the benchers of the two societies, 'to serve for all time to come for the accommodation and education of the students and practitioners of laws of the realm'. The property was granted in free and common socage, to be held by fealty alone as of the manor of East Greenwich, for a rent of £10 a year from each inn. The freehold has since then been held by successive groups of benchers as trustees for the two inns. The rent was purchased from the Crown in 1675, subject to a life interest belonging to Queen Catherine of Braganza, and was finally extinguished by the queen's death in 1705.

No boundary between the two societies was specified in the letters patent. The boundary in 1608 rested on usage, and has since been adjusted by deed of partition (1732), by arbitration (in the 1870s), and by mutual agreements.

The Temple, though in London (unlike Gray's Inn and Lincoln's Inn, which were in Middlesex), has always been outside the jurisdiction of the city. On two unseemly occasions, in 1555 and 1669, when the lord mayor improperly entered the Inner Temple with his swordbearer (a right exercised only in the city), younger members of the society attempted forcibly to pull down the sword. The Inner Temple remains to this day a separate local authority.

[netwrkranger]

The Temple Church

The Church serves both the Inner and Middle Temple, who own the freehold and are jointly responsible for its upkeep, though it has the status of a royal peculiar rather than a private chapel. The incumbent, known since the fourteenth century as the Master of the Temple, is appointed by the Crown, this right of appointment having been reserved when the Church was granted to the two Inns in 1608. As a peculiar, the Church is outside any episcopal or archiepiscopal jurisdiction; and the Master therefore takes his place by patent, without induction or institution. The Master is entitled to a house, provided at the cost of the two societies. There is also a Reader, appointed by one of the two inns by turns.

The Church has a strong musical tradition, brought to wide public notice under the long directorships of Sir Walford Davies (organist 1898-1923) and Sir George Thalben Ball (organist 1923-82). The old organ, destroyed in the Blitz, was made after a fierce building competition which was adjudicated upon by Lord Chancellor Jeffreys, a former bencher of the Inner Temple.

Members of the Inner Temple traditionally sit on the south side of the Church, the southern half being assigned to the Inn under the 1732 deed of partition. The custom was relied on by the Inn in former times as indicating its precedence over the Middle Temple: a disputed claim which has long ceased to possess any significance. It also explains the inscriptions on the outside and inside of the Round, which record the restoration of the south side by the Inner Temple in 1827, when John Gurney was Treasurer.

Temple Church, London

[netwrkranger]

Temple Church History

Temple Church History

The Temple Church is one of the most historic and beautiful churches in London. Use the left-margin tool-bar to read its story, period by period. Here are eight hundred years of history: from the Crusaders in the 12th century, through the turmoil of the Reformation and the founding father of Anglican theology, to some of the most famous church music in London, week by week - music which we invite you to come and hear when you are next within striking distance of the Temple.

The Church was built by the Knights Templar, the order of crusading monks founded to protect pilgrims on their way to and from Jerusalem in the 12th century. The Church is in two parts: the Round and the Chancel. The Round Church was consecrated in 1185 by the patriarch of Jerusalem. It was designed to recall the holiest place in the Crusaders' world: the circular Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. It is a numinous space - and has a wonderful acoustic for singing.

[Shoonra]

Several significant errors. The Inns are considerably less than a thousand years old; the records of Lincoln's Inn, which goes back the farthest, go no earlier than 1422. They are hardly country clubs; they are very tough law schools for British barristers (solicitors go to different schools). "Privately owned" is a relative term; after all, Harvard Law School is also privately owned. When the Sergeant's Inn closed, about 150 years ago, its assets were distributed among the four surviving Inns.

Besides training barristers, they also police the profession, serviing much the same purpose as bar associations do in the US.

The Inner Temple and Middle Temple (there is no Outer Temple) occupy the land (and a few surviving buildings) that had been confiscated when the Knights Templars were outlawed in the 14th century. Approximately 50 years separated the removal of the Knights and the assignment of the buildings to the legal profession, which originally needed literally lodging houses since its practitioners were required to travel to attend the courts.

[Shoonra]

(redundancy deleted).

[netwrkranger]

Actually, some of your information is off too, Shoonra. The Inner Temple dates back to the 12th century.

[Shoonra]

The buildings, as I said, date back to the Knights but the same wikipedia article says that the first use of the buildings to house the legal profession date to about 1380, and its use for a law school some decades later.