Priviledge of the Sessions

[palani]

Found in Eirenarcha Magistrates Manual

Priviledge of the Sessions



And now, as all these owe their service at the Sessions, either by reason of their Office, or by vertue of the Sommons: So all others also may freely attend there, if not for any thing that specially concerneth themselves, yet for the advancement of publike Justice, and for the service of the Queene. And to this end, they are invited thither (as I may say) by a certaine freedome of accesse, and by protection from common arrest: a thing, that is incident to each court of Record, and without the which, Justice should be greatlie hindered. So that, if a man come voluntarily to these Sessions, with the minde, either to preferre any bill of Enditement, or to give information against an other: or to tender a fine upon an Enditement, touching himselfe: or doe come compelled to make appearance for the

376 CAP 3.
The 4. Booke.
Charge

The saving of his bond: and be arrested by the sherife upon common and originall process, in his coming thither, or during his tarrying there: it seemeth that (upon examination of the matter under his oath) he shall be dismissed thereof by the priviledge of this Court, even as it is used in the higher Courts at Westminster, 1.H.7.12.&c.

Since the courts we deal with today seem to want to describe themselves as "courts of record" possibly a get out of jail free card under these conditions might be of some benefit.

[Notorial dissent]

You have no idea what this is about do you?

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Notorial dissent

You have no idea what this is about do you?

Why do you ask?

[palani]

Originally Posted by Notorial dissent

You have no idea what this is about do you?

As you appear to, enlighten me.

[Notorial dissent]

You found it, explain it, or admit you don't have a clue.

[palani]

Originally Posted by Notorial dissent

You found it, explain it, or admit you don't have a clue.

After carefull and exhaustive consideration of the meaning of this passage, I have concluded that it means the following:

And now, as all these owe their service at the Sessions, either by reason of their Office, or by vertue of the Sommons: So all others also may freely attend there, if not for any thing that specially concerneth themselves, yet for the advancement of publike Justice, and for the service of the Queene. And to this end, they are invited thither (as I may say) by a certaine freedom of access, and by protection from common arrest: a thing, that is incident to each court of Record, and without the which, Justice should be greatlie hindered. So that, if a man come voluntarily to these Sessions, with the minde, either to preferre any bill of Enditement, or to give information against an other: or to tender a fine upon an Enditement, touching himselfe: or doe come compelled to make appearance for the saving of his bond: and be arrested by the sherife upon common and originall process, in his coming thither, or during his tarrying there: it seemeth that (upon examination of the matter under his oath) he shall be dismissed thereof by the priviledge of this Court, even as it is used in the higher Courts at Westminster, 1.H.7.12.&c.

Your turn.

[Notorial dissent]

So, in other words, as usual, you haven’t a clue about what any of the material you cribbed is about or referring to. You are at least consistent.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Notorial dissent

So, in other words, as usual, you haven’t a clue about what any of the material you cribbed is about or referring to.

You are at least consistent.

Apparently, you haven't a clue about what any of the material presented is about or referring to.

You are at least consistent.

[palani]

Originally Posted by Notorial dissent

So, in other words, as usual, you haven’t a clue about what any of the material you cribbed is about or referring to. You are at least consistent.

Obviously you have not taken the time to read and analyze the original post and my last post. If you had done so you might observe that the phrase "freedome of accesse" was amended to "freedom of access". This is the entire reason for this Lawe and none other.

In your haste to revert to ad hominem you have again made a complete and utter ass of yourself along with your Civil Engineer accomplice.

[palani]

Originally Posted by Notorial dissent

So, in other words, as usual, you haven’t a clue about what any of the material you cribbed is about or referring to.

crib Verb meaning "steal" is 17c. from alternate meaning "a basket," and this is probably source of student slang "plagiarize" (1778).

In what sense is citing an uncopyrighted legal source and properly attributing passage to that source "plagiarizing"? Do you "plagiarize" when you cite portions of a legal authority or a case cite? Are you non compos?