Service of LoR?

[phreeman2003]

First off, the issues came about mainly due lack of redeemed funds to file in district court or publish orders through county.

Since there has been trespass on the case(man on the land traveling by right), by several judges of the same department (misdemeanor), a couple police departments and impound yards of the same circuit, might I be able to caption the respondents in a way not having to serve every individual entity; as Notice to principal is notice to agent, the possible parties all being agents of said circuit? Each has previously receieved timely refused for cause notice, which were published, at a later date, when funds became available, usually within 30 days of incident. But, all had been r4c within the 72 hour custom.

Because I attempt to make my political status known via employment paperwork only to be later coerced/forced into filling it out their way, so as to receive payment owed, my paychecks are usually delayed. Yes, I have previously begun the redeeming per 12 U.S.C. sec. 411,but I feel being forced into filling out their forms could create(d)unfavorable presumptions to my detriment, as they usually ignore state national and list me as resident.

[netwrkranger]

You check out Clyde Hyde's work?

He may have some tips and ideas for you.

By the way, what are the legal/historical roots of 'Libel of Review'?

[KarenM]

If you are instituting legal action against a person in their individual capacity, you must serve him (her) personally.

You can not conduct legally effective service by "Notice to principal is notice to agent"

If proper service is not effected, the defendants have a good case to have themselves removed from the legal action due to defective service.

Simply stated, how is someone to know that an action has been instituted against them if they are not personally served?

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Held in Default

Hmmmm... The king of misquotes and fabricated evidence.

Why would that help anyone?

Hmmmm....The king of "prove your claim" and his own fabricated "court victories."

[ezrhythm]

Actual notices may use, "Notice to principal..." as it is a notice but if you are serving the counterclaim each agency in the claim must be served. But I haven't ever heard of more than one agency needing to be served.

To save on $, one may take another who is 18+ to do the service. 'May even be present as they serve the papers. Just have the one who actually hands the papers over to sign an Affidavit of Service.

[phreeman2003]

I was figuring with the hidden agenda of the courts not openly declaring the admiralty nature of proceedings, or for that matter, their defacto status operating as unregistered private corporations someone, like David Merrill, or another, very studied in these deceptions may have uncovered an alternate means of effecting service to all these metro agents I've had run ins with, to this point, in one fell swoop. I know in the past I've see captions like John Does 1-15, often in government conspiracy type civil right actions, I think. But, I've not come across any threads to that specific open caption topic, yet. Though, it just occurred to me, such a filing might possibly string along any default timeline.

Mostly because I'm thinking with filing the LoR counterclaim I could possibly clean up the record (consolidate cases) of the previous two unlawful travelling by right arrest instances where the r4c process didn't have its full effect. In that county, the matters went before three judges twice for no show hearings, two bond hearing judges, and I showed up by restricted appearance to two more judges. It seems there's a different judge in the misdemeanor court room on every date, so a blanket service, per se, seems warranted (at least, to the court judges).

Additionally, I also served the nonstatutory abatement (nonpublished)on the chief judge of that court house and the chief judge of the county. Now, adding in the police departments, each policy officer, and including impound yard owners there's easily a dozen who might have personal liability for exceeding their authority, trespass, conversion and kidnap.

As some may recall, my first attempt the fed clerk rejected my papers and, at the time, I had less grasp of the workings of the process, nor the funds or time to do the full blown LoR. Also, I was trying to get another personal means of travel running, then for a short period there I was working six 12 hour days a week, however, the bonds on the second arrest ate up all that. This first one is still pending, as I must have given some impression I'm accepting the courts offer to contract.

I've seen first hand the r4c with foreign judgment/miscellaneous file has teeth because this, the third, time around it halted some eight or so counts in another county, which might just be a bit less corrupt.

It took a while to locate a mode of travel for only $200 bucks and I'll admit I had a bit of a fear to travel, by right, so I was working off borrowed bail money through free remodeling labor.

Throughout this ordeal I lost out on two major jobs not having reliable means to travel, or tools to provide my labor services besides trying to avoid creating presumption via employment paperwork.

Not to mention it ruined my plans on snowbirding to the Florida Republic, to support my Mom, who had just lost my Dad, the month before my first travel arrest. Being there through his passing and seeing the hospital's seizing jurisdiction of his person was the final straw proving I needed to free myself of the feds clutches.

Another long winded episode not needing response of attorners poo pooing the r4c, clerks instructions or LoR. I've seen first hand how David Merrill's process works.

One final comment, my county clerks usually suggest my filing fees are a waste of money in the same manner as some posters here.