Court Seals My Documents!!!

last week i filed a common law writ of habeas corpus,a bond, a affidavit of denial of incorporation, a power of attorney and a copy of the judges oath of office into a case involving a probation sentence. the head judge sent a order stating that the documents were improperly filed by the court clerk. he ordered the clerk to strike the records from being FILED to received!!then he ordered the docket expunged and the documents put under seal!!! folks, this is blatant fraud. part of the writ of habeas corpus was giving the court 10 days to prove jurisdiction which they know they cannot do. now, what i think im gonna do is set up a ex parte meeting with the judge. and work on a way to expose this fraud. a little pertinent information. i filed a motion to vacate judgment in the form of a common law writ of habeas corpus. i gave the court 10 days thru affidavit to prove they have jurisdiction, prove they have enacting clauses,etc. i put down that they agree that i was kidnapped under color of law, my vehicle stolen under color of law, and that a tort has been committed against me if they fail to rebut the affidavit. the judge sent a order stating that none of my documents were pertinent and they are to be placed under court seal and that i failed to file a proper motion to amend or appeal my sentence. ???? he didnt wanna touch none of the issues that a void judgment can be attacked anytime, thus, the placing my case under seal. amazing. important note, the judge signed the order but the copy i have has a original stamp on it but NO signature from the clerk???

[KaosTheory]

I am amazed that you are amazed. Put yourself in the judge's place. Would you not do something similar? I am pretty sure that he already knows that everything he does is a fraud. He just doesn't want any of the sheeple to know it's all a fraud. I mean, it's pretty obvious from his actions here.

You saw his oath....was he even a judge?

KT

I'd be writing up a commercial Affidavit and let him default in about 5 days, and file a lien on that sumbi**h's real property.

Judges need to know that their gig is up.

JMHO

HB

what has them stuck is this: i challenged subject matter jurisdiction and they HAVE to respond. they have already defaulted, no need for another affidavit other than to just say they defaulted on the first one in the writ.. the last part of his order says " to the extent defendant wishes to modify his sentence in this case ( and , though the title of document no 1 above (the writ) seems to suggest this is his intent, there is nothing in the body of the motion remotely appropriate as a motion to set aside, motion to amend sentence, or as a motion for out of time appeal),this court has no jurisdiction, once the term of court has expired, to modify his sentence.now, i didnt file a modification and they know it, so the judge is running right back into statutory garbage. look at this, title 18, part1 chapter 101 sec. 2071 says in part: whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals,removes, mutilates , obliterates, or destroys or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding etc. filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the united states, shall be fined undr this title or imprisoned not more than three years or both. i wonder if him ordering the clerk to change the documents from being filed to received falls under this category? i think so, and whats ugly, i have filed stamped copies and a clerks signature of every document i presented that im gonna make copies of and conceal with family and friends. again, i wonder what my probation officer has to do with getting a copy of the judges order? i wonder what would happen if i file a criminal complaint with the federal district attorney and show them proof that the judge is concealing a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction? lastly, since this is all contracts, im also considering cancelling his offer of his new order. but, first, i wanna give them a out by setting up the ex parte meeting to see if we can come to a meeting of the minds. i know i may seem a little helter skelter, but im gonna sit back and think this thru to make the best decision. i used the law, court cases,etc. no redemption stuff other than to say im not a fiction, and they still trying to ignore.

Hey all,
I'm new to all this. But I just had a question. When dealing with title 18 issues who do they apply to? You said that the judge would be fined or imprisoned 3 years etc..., what parts apply to us and what parts apply to them? Some of title 18 does not seem to fit anyone but those who are under their jurisdiction in the areas of the States defined. I'm feeling my way around on this, but if this is the case how can they bring charges in the first place, unless said act was comitted in their jurisdiction, as defined in title 18 in definitions, right in the begining?