|
Re: Commercial Liens
There are several things wrong with the State's laws "prohibiting" the filing of commercial liens.
1. The state statute claims that the lien must be accompanied by a court order in order to be valid. THIS IS A LIE. If that be the case, then perhaps the "State" could explain the ruling of the U. S. Supreme Court (by whose decisions your "State" courts are bound whether they like it or not) in Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 349 (1968)"The ability to place a lien upon a man’s property, such as to temporarily deprive him of its beneficial use, without any judicial determination of probable cause dates back not only to medieval England but also to Roman times." [emphasis mine]
2. The "State" has assumed that you are a 'person' as that term is defined in the law. If you look up the definition in your State's Code, you will see that a "person" is defined as either a legal or commercial entity. You are neither, so the statute cannot apply to you.
3. You should immediately establish with the "State" that you are a "sovereign", and not a "person" as that term is defined under their laws, and challenge the "State" to prove otherwise. Get the "State" to admit that you are a "sovereign", then show them: United States v. Fox, 94 US 315, "Since in common usage, the term 'person' does not include the sovereign, statutes employing the phrase are ordinarily construed to exclude it......"
Your State's law DOES NOT apply to you because the "State" is, itself, an artificial entity. The "State" cannot do anything, because it is a fictitious entity which exists only on paper. It must have a human representative to act for it. If the "State" or its representative cannot show where you have signed a contract agreeing to do business with the "State", then the "State" cannot state a claim against you upon which relief can be granted.
|
