Court Discuss the tactics used by the court system, and how to develop your counter-tactics for success in the courtroom, dealing with citations, criminal and civil matters.


Go Back   Suijuris Forums > Educational & Learning > Court
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 02-06-2005, 03:52 AM
kgod999
 
Posts: n/a
commercial law

yep, i know those things, but, there is remedy for filing the affidavit of denial AFTER a trail or conviction also, its called "mistake", its right there with the law for the negative averment you speak about. the court sealed my affidavit in one of my cases, ive got a remedy for that im working on as we speak. its powerful. (the affidavit of denial of incorporation). they cannot get around standing with this issue.
9. Rule 9. Pleading Special Matters

(a) Capacity.
It is not necessary to aver the capacity of a party to sue or be sued or the authority of a party to sue or be sued in a representative capacity or the legal existence of an organized association of persons that is made a party, except to the extent required to show the jurisdiction of the court. When a party desires to raise an issue as to the legal existence of any party or the capacity of any party to sue or be sued or the authority of a party to sue or be sued in a representative capacity, the party desiring to raise the issue shall do so by specific negative averment, which shall include such supporting particulars as are peculiarly within the pleader's knowledge.

(b) Fraud, Mistake, Condition of the Mind.
In all averments of fraud or mistake, the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake shall be stated with particularity. Malice, intent, knowledge

Last edited by kgod999 : 02-06-2005 at 03:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-06-2005, 10:57 AM
sadie sadie is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 373
Rule of evidence 201 Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts.
__________________
sadie

not legal advice - just my 2 cents (not lawful money)
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-07-2005, 01:24 AM
adnnxu
 
Posts: n/a
Re:Commercial law...

Commerce and the commercial law it's been around since the dawn of
mankind.
Commercial offer and acceptance was the engine which brought progress
to human society.
As the commerce was evolving,the need for commercial law became a
stringent necessity.
Since the society became so complex,so was the commerce.

This was the turning point when some of the merchants thought that a new
device had to be created.
And that device was a corporation.

The idea was to have a fiction created,to take the place of the marchant,
man/woman,and to represent him/her in commerce.
The purpose of the new cration was to take the fall,in case of misdeeds,and
the marchant( man/woman ) to escape physical punishment.

As the situation is today in our society,the roll of management it is assumed
by the corporations.
The rules and regulations,or as they are known "commercial laws",that
corporations enact to police THEIR own people,are mandatory upon all THEIR
members.

In order for some members of our society to be able to exercise their free
will,it had to be a way out from under this corporate veil.

And this way out is the REMEDY( the affidavit of corporate denial ).

One more thing to keep in mind,any form of offer and acceptance has to
be at least volunteer.

Any form of cod violation is in reality a violation of commercial law.

Men and women can only accept or offer a contract,knowingly,volutarily
and intentionally.

I do not see any difficulty in understanding this simple principle.

__________________________________________________ ___

As Josef Stalin said in his last testament,to the soviets:" work like a slave,
eat like the dying and if don't like it,just follow me".
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-18-2006, 08:46 PM
Ice's Avatar
Ice Ice is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,866
Simple questions:

1. Is anyone stating that Americans have been tricked into "slavery" or that they are a "conquered people"??

2. If the answer to # 1 above is "Yes": Please explain how any "Slave" or "conquered People" have the RIGHT TO CONTRACT.

Get back to me when you figure that out.

Ice
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UCC 1-207, Code & Cites suijuris UCC 48 10-16-2008 01:57 PM
Law is not contract rushpat Citizenship & Jurisdiction 20 12-19-2007 08:15 PM
Thrown down the gauntlet at quatloos! Heidi Guedel Banks, Collectors, and CRAs 179 05-14-2007 04:56 PM
The UCC and Juristiction - know the code. Bulletproof Monk Taxation 3 12-27-2005 09:59 PM
The right to travel SUSANMORGAN Travel 3 09-11-2005 10:13 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:39 AM.
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
2003-2008 Copyright by Law Research Group, LLC Terms of Use | Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Notice/Disclaimer