|
Re:Proof that plaintiff attorney lied.
Montana,
Jersee is correct, victory is yours, just apply your ever growing knowledge.
"It is my understanding that attorneys can not testify as they do not qualify as a competent witness.& Testimony from a competent witness is one of the things required to have a court.& Also, they are presumed under oath because of the oath that they take to uphold the constitution.& However,& there must be some way around this for them because otherwise I don't think that they would so readily purger themselves."
You are correct, if they appear as an attorney representing the "firm" that purchased the debt, they cannot testify or submit their own affidavits, etc. THEY CANNOT PLACE ANYTHING INTO EVIDENCE, PERIOD. If the attorney(s)&attempt to do so, object, object, object. If the "firm" submits affidavits, no problem. You have the RIGHT to direct examination to rebut the affidavit. If they are not present, to bad! The only way around this&dilema would be if someone purchased the debt in their personal capacity and then named themselves as the plaintiff. They cound then stand in court as the plaintiff, not&an attorney. That would allow them to testify, but they still have the issue of the Law referred to above!
Regards
Sui Juris
__________________
When a statute, code, or court holding changes tomorrow, does reality change? Does truth change? Does right and wrong change?
If so, there are no absolutes, and the only logical conclusion is that reality, truth, and right and wrong are determined arbitrarily on a daily basis by those with the most power, guns, and money, and the rest of us can choose to run, fight, or be their slaves.
|
