Reconciling Methods

We are all at our certain stage(s) in these so-called wargames, created by another.

In time, collectively, these things will all come together (sooner than me think's).

What you thread/post herein in presentable, indeed. But there is always that fellow (or female) that say's... Hey I tried that and it didn't work.

Hence: I tried that and it didn't work!

So... I'll keeep coming back to view/see if there are other(s) who have attained the reading/study, as I have, within their realm, in the only One World Court designed by this country of "our(s)" to resolve this dispute.

Weis:

You are doing a great job at reaching collective [p]eopes, keep up the great work/time that you spend, I for one couldn't have did it without you, even when we bumped heads at one time (grin).

And, most importantly, as always... Happy Trails... (Big Grin)!

Thanks, Weis, for your precious time and, precious efforts (+ your precious brain :-) to help your brothers/sisters...to get some comprehensible pictures.
Wargames is right. Keep on.

This is kewl.

This is what SJ is all about. information, and learning.

HB

[weishaupt1776]

I'm starting to see some LB Bork/Stevens overlap, too.

[weishaupt1776]

Here's an update post #8

Also, for the newbies, Prof Jim started this mess last year with one of the early Sui Juris Classics, Jurisdiction

[KaosTheory]

Post #8 seems to put it all together rather nicely. If courts were really courts of law instead of just elaborate con games then this line of questioning would make people's lives a lot less complicated.

[weishaupt1776]

Yeah, but in order to understand post 8, you have to understand what standing is in the first place in the subsequent posts

[KaosTheory]

I agree. You have to understand that and also that the court is really just an elaborate con game. At least, when the court is trying to pretend that the state has standing.